free will Flashcards
What is Free Will?
The ability to consciously choose without being constrained between different possible courses of action
Free Will: Hard Determinism
- FW is not possible in hard determinism
- all effects have a cause
- “there is at any instance exactly one physically possible future”
- FW is an illusion
- effect -> effect
Free Will: Libertarianism
- FW is possible because the universe is not (always) deterministic
- effect without a cause: impossible, a miracle (Dennett, 2007)
- agent -> effect
- “one wants to be what tradition has it that Eve was when she bit the apple. Perfectly free to do otherwise. So perfectly free, in fact, that even God couldn’t tell which way she’d jump” (Fodor, 2003)
Free Will: Compatibilism
- what kind of FW is compatible with determinism? not the libertarian kind
- determinism
- choices
- inevitable & evitable
- the will is “nothing but the internal impression we feel and are conscious of, when we knowingly give rise to any new motion of our body, or new perception of our mind” (Hume, 1739)
The Timing of Agency:
What did Blackmore say about Libet?
Libet et al (1984):
* “Many philosophers and scientists have argued that free will is an illusion. Unlike all of them, Benjamin Libet found a way to test it.” – Susan Blackmore
The Timing of Agency:
Libet et al.’s (1984)
0 repose
1 (-500 ms) EEG measures Readiness potential (RP)
2 (-250 ms) Person notes the position of the dotwhen decides
3 (0 ms) Act
The Timing of Agency:
Libet et al.’s (1984) Conclusions:
- will does not play a causal role in action
However: - unconscious brain events start process
- conscious (brain?) events vetoes or releases action
Veto Power Process
1.) brain signal
1.) 0.3 sec delay
2.) desire - e.g. to eat chocolate
3.) veto power for 0.2 secs
4.) movement occurs
Soon et al (2008)
- prediction of decision from micropatterns of brain activity
- “felt” time of decision for left or right decision
- found that the outcome of a decision can be encoded in brain activity of prefrontal and parietal cortex up to 10 sec before it enters awareness
Soon et al (2008): Criticism
But Libet assumes there’s one finishing line when consciousness occurs (Dennett, 1990)
-cartesian material (idea that at some place (or places) in the brain, there is some set of information that directly corresponds to our conscious experience)
Percentage of Behaviour under Conscious Control
5%
Wilson & Nisbett (1977):
3 reasons why they claim why people do not have access to these higher order cognitive processes?
1.) unaware of the existence of a stimulus that importantly influenced a response,
2.) unaware of the existence of the response
3.) unaware that the stimulus
has affected the response
What is the major claim of the Nisbett and Wilson (1977) article?
There is evidence that people do not have much introspective access, i.e. the ability to perceive, higher order cognitive processes
Wilson & Nisbett (1977):
Percentage of Behaviour which is not Freely Chosen (Unconscious)
A 12%
B 17%
C 31%
D 40%
What is the Adaptive Unconscious?
Wilson (2002):
* set of unconscious mental processes influencing judgement & decision making
* different from conscious processing: faster, effortless, more focused on the present, but less flexible
examples:
* habits
* perceptions
* learned associations
* reflexes