M3L5 Cannons of Construction Flashcards
Name 5 Cannons of Construction
Associated words rule, limited class rule, exclusion rule, general /specific provisions rule, and respectively rule.
What’s the latin word for the associated words rule?
Noscitur a sociis
Whats the latin word for the exclusion rule?
Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
Whats the limited class rule in latin?
ejusdem generis
Whats the general/specific provisions rule in latin?
generalia specialibus non derogant
Whats the respectivity rule in latin?
reddendo singula singulis
What is the associated words rule?
- “it is known by the company it keeps.”
- words must be read in the context of the other words in the section in which it appears.
- words can be coloured by the meanings of surrounding words
- “words of a feather flock together”
What is the limited class rule?
- means of the same kind or nature
- applies after a list of words followed by a “catch-all” like “whatsoever” or “any other thing”.
- the list of specific things form an identifiable class of things (in commonality)
- with a class, the rule applies to limit the catch-all language, only to include things in the class
What’s the Paragraph structure for the SI exam?
- Thesis Statement
- The facts
- The law
- Your analysis
- Counter Argument (needing more information?)
- Conclusion
What is the exclusion rule?
- The mention of one is the exclusion of the other.
- Where some things are mentioned individually but others are not, those not mentioned/omitted are deliberately excluded.
- Some lists with no catchall language
What’s the difference between the exclusion rule and the associated words rule?
Exclusion rule meant if something is explicitly mentioned in a law, it suggests anything that’s not mentioned is not included. Whereas, Associated words rule means that the meaning of a word or phrase in a law is understood by the words around it.
Exclusion rule focuses on what’s said but the associated words rule looks at the context.
What’s the general/specific provisions rule?
- the general does not derogate from the specific
- a specific provision prevails over a general enactment, even where the language of that later enactment is wide enough to the earlier enactments subject matter
- only applies in the earlier of two enactments, both in the same act
- if in the later provision, doctrine of implied repeal.
If asked to look at clash what cannons of construction what should be considered?
- Look for more specific piece
- the general specific provisions rule
- doctrine of implied repeal
What’s the respectivity rule?
- two sets of language that are ambiguous
- first set with first word associated with second sets first word.
- EG. red and green traffic lights mean stop and go. AND breaking and entering
Whats the Reddendo singula singulis rule?
Respectivity rule