M2 Flashcards
r vs k
r = growth rate: how quickly a pop increases early on
k = carrying capacity: how many indiv a pop can hold
Nₜ = N₀ert
predicting population size under exponential growth
methods of predicting population growth
- mark & recapture
- N = MC/R
- proportion of indiv marked in 2nd sampling should = proportion of full pop
- N = total pop size
- M = # of 1st sampling
- C = # of 2nd sampling
- R = # marked indiv recaptured in 2nd sampling
- photographic mark & recapture ➞ uses unique animal markings
- ex: giraffs
- avoids methodological problems like:
- placing tags
- tagging negatively affecting animals
- # of indiv/migration routes
- life tables
- formula
- what does the mark & recapture method assume about the population and our marked individuals?
- Reasons you might not catch any marked indiv in the second sampling
- steady pop size
- stationary pop/no migration
- no births/deaths
2.
- potential migration patterns
- timing
- wrong tags/tags fall off
- large/infinite pop ➞ not large enough sample to give accurate estimate
proportion of indiv marked in 2nd sampling should = proportion of full pop
N = total pop size
M = # of 1st sampling
C = # of 2nd sampling
R = # marked indiv recaptured in 2nd sampling
controls on pop size
density independent: factors do not depend on pop density
- factors affect in same way at same magnitude
- usually abiotic:
- strong enough to survive…
- windstorm
- hurricane
- floods
- fire
density dependent: factors do depend on pop density
- stronger impact on pop with more indiv
- usually biotic:
- predation
- disease
- resources
- waste
- fuel for fire
pop density
org living in that pop (same area)
logistic growth pattern
when a pop is large (close to k): growth slows
- K ≈ 0
- r ≈ 0 ➞ growth is slow
when a pop is small: slow growth that follows mostly exponential pattern
- K ≈ 1
- growth is exponential
predicting pop size under logistic growth
life tables
sets of data give an idea of how the pop is changing through time based on patterns of survival & reproduction
age demographics and r
r correlates to the proportion of indiv in their reproductive ages
- ↑ proportion of indiv in reproductive age = higher growth rate
- ↓ proportion of indiv in reproductive age (majority of pop post-reproductive age) = slower growth rate
human demographic transition
predictable pattern that human societies & pop tend to follow
humans are unusual compared to other species
- live long past reproductive ages
- produces complicated social dynamics in human systems
- financial/societal impacts of a top-heavy pop (↑ proportion of elderly)
- fewer paying into SS than taking out
birth rate is below death rate
Aristotle
species are static & deviations of ‘ideal’ are mistakes
- rigid ladder
- scala naturae did not incorporate any mechanism for change in species through time
Zhuang Zhou
species change over time, even into other species
- mutability in species
- cycle
development of understanding evolution
contrast in thought between static & changing species
Al-Jahiz
species can change based on envir
- acclimation
- microevolution
Al-Biruni
limited resources limit # of indiv in a given envir
Ibn Khaldun
descent w/ modification
- still hierarchical
- man came from monkey
- man’s relationship to the world & their place in it
Linneas
life is static
- laid foundation for scientific racism
- gave credence to distinct classes w/ scientific classification
Alexander Von Humbolt
- father of biogeography: study of where org live & why
- connected ranges of org to envir
- abiotic envir shapes who can live there
- outspoke against treatment of indigenous
catastrophism
earth/life shaped by major sudden events
- why we see physical form of earth the way we do
- org in diff layers = unrelated ➞ came from diff major events
- ex: volanoes & layers in earth
- George Cuvier
- Freidrich Tiedermann
gradualism
earth/life structured by long, slow processes
- erosion & sedimentation
- ex: grand canyon
- influenced Darwin
- Charles Lyell
- Mary Anning
George Cuvier
- catastrophist
- disappearance of some lineages driven by sudden major events
- appearance of new lineages from migration of new species
- shown in the layers of earth
- craniometry: measurements of human skull to support IQ variation in species
Freidrich Tiedermann
- catastrophist
- Cuvier’s student
- called him racist & his work shotty science
Charles Lyell
- gradualist about ecology
- species = static & immutable
Mary Anning
- gradualist
- avid fossile collector
- not accepted into british fossil society
- responsible for many discoveries from fossils
evidence for catastrophism
volcanoes & layers
evidence for gradualism
gradual differences in traits over time in fossils
both homozygotes are overrepresented
- inbreeding
- natural selection- diversifying
one homozygote is overrepresented
long-term drift
heterozygotes are overrepresented
- outbreeding
2 natural selection - stabilizing
evolutionary thought by 1800s
accepted
unanswered Qs
accepted:
- gradual change is important
- earth is old
- extinction occurs
unanswered Qs:
- origins of new species
- species resemblance & underlying features
- reasons for poorly adapted vs well adapted
- mechanism for evolution
Jean-Baptiste Lemarck
- first use of “evolution”
- org passed down traits acquired from use/disuse w/in a lifetime
- actually describing acclimation, traits not passed on - hierarchical view of nature
- hierarchy = complexing force
- could move w/in levels but levels are not related
John Edminstone
- Darwin’s mentor
- learned nat hx & taxidermy on plantation
- freed in England & opened taxidermy shop ➞ taught darwin
- Darwin inspired by his nat hx stories
- very good at taxidermy ➞ still have specimens to this day
Darwin
observations
- org had similarities & differences across the Galapagos
- pigeon breeding selected desired traits ➞ maybe nature followed similar selection
focus:
- variety across groups
- how change occurs
- what mechanisms drive change throughout time
on the origin of species
- species change over time ➞ diverged gradually
- species share common ancestor ➞ descent w/ modification
- change due to increased survival/reproduction based on beneficial traits (fitness) ➞ natural selection
Alfred Russel Wallace
- similar observations to Darwin
- had to sell objects to fund trips
- corresponded with Darwin ➞ potentially swapped info
- diff evidence surfacing in support of nat selection
descent w/ modification
species descent from common ancestor ➞ see in common traits
ex: limb bones: same in all tetrapods, but adapted for diff fx
- walking (horses)
- flying (bats)
- hopping (frogs)
- swimming (porpoise)
homologous traits vs analogous traits
homologous: descended from common ancestor
- ex: spiked leaves/stems
- limb bones of humans & cats
analogous: convergent evolution ➞ similar in diff org b/c similar selective pressures
- analogous if ancestors did not have trait
- ex: streamlined body shape of dolphins (mammal) & sharks (fish)
- ex: wings of birds & insects
Natural Selection inferences
- there is a struggle for existence ➞ why is there not exponential growth?
- indiv vary in traits ➞ some = better competitors in the struggle for existence
- traits that enhance survival/reproduction (fitness) ↑ freq in pop in comparison over time ➞ adaptation
evolution
genetic change over time
- random change of freq in pop is independent of traits
- all pop evolve at all times
adaptation
type of evolution occurring through natural selection
- traits that keep org alive = ones that are inherited
microevolution
w/in species
- changes in freq of genetic variations across generations
- small-scale changes
- short time-frame (human time scale)
- population level
macroevolution
speciation
- accumulation of microevolutionary changes
- new genetic groups arise
- long time-frame (geologic scale)
- large-scale changes
conditions for natural selection
- reproduction
- variation in traits
- inheritance
- differential success aka fitness: indiv w/ diff traits differ in survival/reproductive success
- trait value does not cause diff success in reproductive if expressed at diff points in lifetime
patterns of selection
- stabilizing
- directional
- disruptive/diversifying
- balancing
- frequency-dependent
- spatial variation
- temporal variation - sexual selection
stabilizing selection
phenotypes nearest the mean have highest fitness
- mean stays same
- ↓ variation
- ↑ in medium & ↓ in extreme
- distribution narrows
- newborn birthweight
directional selection
phenotypes at 1 extreme have highest fitness
- mean trends towards extreme
- ex: bent grass & copper mine tolerance
disruptive/diversifying selection
phenotypes at both extremes have higher fitness than mean
- ↑ variation
- maintains diversity
- bimodal pattern
- ex: coho salmon
balancing selection
selection maintains variation in a pop
frequency-dependent selection
type of balancing selection where the rarer phenotype has the highest fitness
- phenotype frequency oscillates over time
- dominant ≠ beneficial
- ex: cichlid fish
spatial & temporal variation
forms of balancing selection
- spatial variation: diff traits for same species in adjacent bushes
- ex: stick bugs in adjacent bushes
- variation in time:
- ex: seasonally fluctuating selection
- daily fluctuating selection for org with short life-spans
sexual selection
driven by:
- competition for mates
- ex: elephant seals - ex: elks w/ their antlers - ex: nudibranch hermaphrodites
- mate choice: runaway selection ➞ ornaments to attract males drive mate choice (the bigger the better)
- ex: peacock's feathers - ex: baboons blue testicles - ex: bird's plumes
altruism
behavior that ↓ indiv fitness but ↑ other’s fitness
hamilton’s rule
defines how benefits to close relatives (↑ reprod output) can outweigh costs to the altruist (own lost reprod output from altruistic event)
- when is kin selection supported by natural selection
r B > C
r = coefficient of relatedness: fraction of genes shared
B = benefit to relative: ↑ in offspring for relative
C = cost to altruist: loss of offspring for altruist
- ↑ benefits or relatedness incurs a higher cost
inclusive fitness
sum of an indiv own fitness & its contribution to success/survival of relatives
kin selection
favors behaviors that ↑ reproductive success of relatives, even at cost to indiv
- ex: belding ground squirrel
- ex: prairie dogs
- ex: worker bees
exceptions to hamilton’s rule:
- reciprocal altruism: altruist has reasonable expectation that sacrifices will be reciprocated in the future
- repeated interactions
- non-related indiv
- ex: vampire bats
- sexual selection: displays of altruism ↑ mating options
constraints on natural selection
- physical
- evolutionary hx
- tradeoffs
- lack of variation