Loss Of Control Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q
  1. D must suffer a loss of self control
A

R v Coker: merely giving in (succumbing) to requests doesn’t amount to a LSC
R v Duffy - d not master of his mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

S54 coroners and justice act 2009

A

D shall not be guilty of murder if:

  • D’s conduct resulted from a loss of self control
  • the LSC caused by a qualifying trigger
  • persons of Ds age, sex, and in his circumstances with a normal tolerance and self restraint might have done a similar or the same thing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Richens ‼️

A
  • not being able to control his actions, not his mind
  • d couldn’t restrain himself from what he was doing
  • not that D did know what he was doing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. Anger trigger
    S55(4)- d’s LSC must come from:
    1- things said or done
    2- which must be of an extremely grave character
    3- give d a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged (Mohammed, r v Evans)
A

Exclusion!!!
Fact that things said or done constitutes sexual infidelity must be disregarded - r v Clinton
Lord judge: if only sexual infidelity is relied on for QT- must be disregarded however it’s unrealistic to exclude where it’s integral in the case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Fear trigger

S55(3)- Ds LSC must come from Ds fear of serious violence from V, against D or another identified person

A

Pearson- (fear from dad to brother)
Clegg- no fear from V
Ahluwahlia- acted out of threat of serious violence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Incitement exclusion

A

S55(6)(a) & (b)- inciting the fear or anger trigger in order to provide an excuse for violence invalidates the defence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

S54(2) doesn’t matter whether the LSC is sudden or not - r v Ahluwahlia
- a slow burn reaction may negate a loss of self control

A

R v baillie- Ds LSC can be substantial over a longer period of time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

S54(4) D can’t use the defence if he acted out of a desire for considered revenge

A

R v Ibrahams and Gregory

Harassing and attack later

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Person of Ds
    Age - r v Caplin (less expected of young)
    Sex - generally men are more short tempered
    Circumstances - tolerance and self restraint
A

General rule: all of Ds circumstances exception = a circumstance that only affects Ds tolerance and restraint can’t be considered - s54(3)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Taunting something affecting tolerance cases

A

Gregson
Asmalash
Taunting this can add to anger trigger and then be considered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly