LOSS OF CONTROL Flashcards
ACT
Sections 54-55 Coroners and Justice Act 2009
DEFINITION
D’s act or omission in killing V resulted from a loss of control which had a qualifying trigger and a person of D’s age and sex, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint, might have acted in the same or a similar way
THERE MUST BE A LOSS OF CONTROL
S54(2)
- The loss of control does not need to be sudden - jury can take delay into account
- (R v Clinton, Parker and Evans) there must be sufficient evidence to leave the issue to the jury
- (R v Jewell) D is not in control if he has lost the ability to act with considered judgement or normal powers of reasoning
- (R v Ahluwalia) 2-hour delay was sufficient as D had not calmed down in that time
-(Baille) will not count if D acting out of revenge
THERE MUST BE A QUALIFYING TRIGGER
1) FEAR TRIGGER S55(3)
2) ANGER TRIGGER S55(4)
3)COMBINATION S55(5)
FEAR TRIGGER
S55(3)- D fears serious violence from V
the test is subjective - as long as the D’s fear of serious violence is genuine, it does not need to be a reasonable fear
fear of violence from burglars now considered as a qualifying trigger (Martin)
ANGER TRIGGER
S55(4)- things said or done (or both)
a) constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character and
b) caused D to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged
the objective test is used: jury decide if reasonable man would have felt seriously wronged
the threshold is very high, so that the defence will rarely succeed (Doughtry)
COMBINATION
S55(5)- can be a combination of fear and anger triggers (sands)
s55(6)(a-b)
fear and anger triggers cannot be used if D incites the situation and uses it as an excuse for violence (Johnson), D started an argument with V who retaliated. D raised loss of control as a defence to his killing of V . this was not expected
s55(6)(c)
sexual infidelity alone not enough for anger trigger but in (Clinton) infidelity could be taken into account if combined with other fear or anger trigger issues
THE OBJECTIVITY TEST
S54(1)(C) The jury will decide whether a person of the D’s sex and age, with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint and in D’s circumstances, might have have reacted in the same or in a similar way (Camplin) age and sex an important consideration
CIRCUMSTANCES CAN INCLUDE
(Gregson) unemployment, epilepsy, depression
(Clinton) discovering infidelity
(Hill) sexual abuse suffered as a child
FACTORS CANNOT BE CONSIDERED
Intoxication (Asmelash)
Bad temper/ anger issues (Mohammed)