DURESS Flashcards
DEFINITION
Duress occurs where the D is forced to commit the criminal act by someone else
DURESS BY THREATS
D is forced to commit a crime because of threats of death/ serious injury made to him
- Not available for murder (Howe)
Or
Attempted murder (Gotts)
THERE MUST BE A THREAT TO CAUSE SERIOUS INJURY/ DEATH
(Valderrama-Vega)
Must be effective but not always immediate (Hudson & Taylor)
Threat must take effect as soon as crime is committed
Not applicable to property (Lynch), expose adultery (Singh), psych harm (Baker & Wilkins), severe pain (Quayle)
THE THREAT MUST BE DIRECTED AGAINST THE D, IMMEDIATE FAMILY (MARTIN) OR SOMEONE CLOSE TO D (Conway)
Anyone D is responsible for (Hasan)
DID THE D ACT REASONABLY
A) D honestly and reasonably believe life was in immediate danger (Martin) AND
B) would a sober and reasonable person have responded in the same way? (Hegarty)
THE THREATS HAVE TO RELATE DIRECTLY TO CRIME COMMITTED BY D
D can only use the defence if the threats are made in order to commit a specific crime (Cole)
DURESS IS ONLY AVAILABLE IF THE D IS PUT IN A SITUATION WHERE THERE IS NO AVENUE OF ESCAPE (Gill)
Must be no time to escape/ raise alarm (Gill)
If raising alarm would not be effective, then duress allowed (Hudson & Taylor)
D CANNOT RELY ON DURESS IF THEY HAVE VOLUNTARILY LAID THEMSELVES OPEN TO THREATS (SHARP)
Where the D brought duress on himself defence will fail (Sharp)
Joining a gang= fail (Sharp)
D foresees risk = fail (Hasan)
DURESS BY CIRCUMSTANCES
D is forced to commit a crime because of the situation he finds himself in (Luller/ Conway)
The Graham test:
(A) D honestly and reasonably believe life was in immediate danger (Martin) AND
(B) Would a sober and reasonable person have responded in the same way? (Hegarty)
1) Not available for murder (Pommell)
2) D must have genuine belief if no actual threat (Cairns)
3) Must be imminent if not immediate (Abdul- Hussain)
DURESS BY NECCESSITY
D finds himself in circumstances which force him to act in order to prevent a worse evil from occurring (Dudley & Stevens)
(Re A) defence of necessity considered, even to a potential charge of murder.
(Shaylar) criteria:
A) prevent greater evil
B) evil must be directed towards D/ person they are responsible for
C) act must be reasonable and proportionate to the evil avoided