Logical Reasoning - Question Stems/Answers Flashcards

1
Q

LSAT question stems cover:

A
  • Identify details of the stimulus
  • Describe the structure of the argument
  • strengthen or weaken the argument
  • identify inferences, main points, and assumptions
  • recognize errors of reasoning
  • reconcile conflicts
  • find arguments that are identical in structure
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the 13 logical reasoning question types?

A
  1. Must be true/most supported
  2. Main point
  3. Point at issue/Point of agreement
  4. Assumption
  5. Justify the conclusion
  6. Strengthen/support
  7. Resolve the paradox
  8. Weaken
  9. Method of reasoning
  10. Flaw in the reasoning
  11. Parallel reasoning/parallel flaw
  12. Evaluate the argument
  13. Cannot be true
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define “Must Be True/Most Supported”

A

Asks you to identify the answer choice that is best proven by the information in the stimulus

“If the statements above are true, which one of the following must also be true?”

“Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define “Main Point”

A

Asks you to find the primary conclusion made by the author

“The main point of the argument is that”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define “Assumption”

A

Asks to identify an assumption of the author’s argument.

“Which one of the following is an assumption required by the argument above?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define “Point of Issue/Point of Agreement”

A
  • Asks you to identify a point of contention between two speakers (these questions are exclusively two speaker stimulus)

“Jones and Smith disagree about whether”

  • Asks you to identify a point of agreement between two speakers
    (these questions are exclusively two speaker stimulus)

“Achelle’s and Hakim’s statements provide the most support for the claim that they agree about which one of the following?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define “Justify the Conclusion”

A

Asks you to supply a piece of information that, when added to the premises, proves the conclusion.

“Which one of the following, if assumed, allows the conclusion above to be properly drawn?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define “Strengthen/Support”

A

Asks you to support the author’s argument or strengthens it in some way.

“Which one of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?”

“Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the statement above?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define “Resolve the Paradox”

A

The stimulus contains a discrepancy or seeming contradiction. Asks you to identify choice that best resolves the situation.

“Which in the following, if true, would most effectively resolve the apparent paradox above?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define “Weaken”

A

Asks to attack or undermine the author’s argument.

“Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define “Method of Reasoning”

A

Asks to describe, in abstract, terms, the way in which the author made his or her argument.

“Which one of the following describes the technique of reasoning used above?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define “Flaw in the Reasoning”

A

Asks to describe, in abstract terms, the error of reasoning committed by the author.

“The reasoning in the mayor’s argument is flawed because this argument”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define “Parallel Reasoning/Parallel Flaw”

A

Asks to identify the choice that contains reasoning most similar in structure to the reasoning presented in the stimulus.

“Which one of the following arguments is most similar in its pattern of reasoning to the argument above?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define “Evaluate the Argument”

A

Asks you to determine the logical validity of the argument.

“The answer to which one of the following questions would contribute most to an evaluation of the argument?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define “Cannot Be True”

A

Asks to identify cannot be true or is most weakened based on the information in stimulus.

“If the statements above are true, which one of the following cannot be true?”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which question stems are proven the stimulus?

A

Must be true/most strongly supported

Main point

Point at issue/point of agreement

Method of reasoning

Flaw in the reasoning

Parallel reasoning/parallel flaw

17
Q

Which question stems help the stimulus?

A

Assumptions

Justify the conclusion

Strengthen/support

Resolve the paradox

18
Q

Which question stems hurt the stimulus?

A

Weaken

19
Q

Which question stems disprove the stimulus?

A

Cannot be true

20
Q

Family #1 - Prove: what are the rules?

A

The information in the stimulus is used to prove one of the answer choices correct.

  1. You must accept the stimulus information to prove that one of the answer choices must be true.
  2. Any information in an answer choice that does not appear either directly in the stimulus, as a combination of items in the stimulus, or under the umbrella of a concept in the stimulus will be incorrect.
21
Q

Family #2 - Help: what are the rules?

A

There are errors of reasoning present, or leaps in logic, and you are asked to find an answer choice that closes the hole.

  1. The information on the stimulus is suspect. They are often reasoning errors present, and depending on the question, you will help shore up that argument in some way.
  2. The answer choices are accepted as given, even if they include “new” information. Your task is to determine which answer choice best meets the question posed in the stem.
22
Q

Family #3 - Hurt: what are the rules?

A

You attack or hurt the argument

  1. The information in the stimulus is suspect. There are often reasoning errors present, and you will further weaken the argument in some way.
  2. The answer choices are accepted as given, even if they include “new” information. Your task is to determine which answer choice best attacks the argument in the stimulus.
23
Q

Family #4 - Disprove: what are the rules?

A

Must use the information in the stimulus to prove that one of the answer choices cannot occur.

  1. You must accept the stimulus information - even if it contains an error of reasoning - and use it to prove that one of the answer choices cannot occur.
  2. If an answer choice contains information that does not appear directly in the stimulus or as the result of a combination of items in the stimulus, then that answer choice could be true and it is incorrect. The correct answer choice will directly disagree with the stimulus or a consequence of the stimulus.
24
Q

When a stimulus without a conclusion is presented on the LSAT, only three types of questions can be posed to you:

A

Must be true (most common)
Cannot be true
Resolve the paradox

25
Q

Question types often based on flawed or weak arguments that contain holes that must be closed or open further are:

A

Strengthen or weaken

26
Q
  1. Stem explicitly note that the stimulus contains an error of reasoning is?
  2. Stem notes that the stimulus contains valid or invalid reasoning is?
A
  1. Flaw in reasoning

2. Method of Reasoning

27
Q

Stem require the identification of the type of reasoning used and then parallel it is?

A

Parallel Reasoning

28
Q

What is a weaken except question stem?

A

The four incorrect answers weaken the argument and the one correct answer does not weaken the argument.

29
Q

What is a least question stem?

A

The four answer will meet the stated criteria (weaken, strengthen, resolve, etc) and the one correct answer won’t