Logic Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Define Logic, according to Aristotle

A

An instrument for knowing and explaining truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define Logic, according to St. Thomas Aquainas

A
Common sense (natural Logic)
Every person has it
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define thoughts

A

Concepts conveyed through words which complete the concept by expressing it outwardly and making it known.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define concepts

A

The sum of which makes up knowledge, the truth we know through words used in a phrase, sentence, statement, declaration, premise, proposition, speech or languag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define language

A

Medium by which thoughts are conveyed from one person to another

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Define legal language

A

Medium by which legal thoughts or truths are conveyed from one person to another in legal communication, transactions or proceedings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define truth

A

The conformity of the mind with the order of things outside of the mind

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T/F

Truth is not the same as correctness

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define correct inference

A

Said to be logical, implying conformity with rules

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Define logical inference

A

Process of drawing a conclusion from related premises or propositions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Define deductive reasoning

A
  • Deduces a general conclusion from a series of related particular truths
  • States the propositions from particular to general
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Define deductive inference

A

Draws a particular conclusion from universal truth stated as premise.

  • A particular conclusion applies to an indeterminate portion of totality
  • states propositions from general to particular
  • expressed in the form of syllogism
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Define syllogism

A

A group of propositions which one is claimed to follow from the others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define premises

A

These are assumptions supporting the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Define premises

A

These are assumptions supporting the conclusion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define major premise

A

A precedent explaining the truth

-rule of law, the standard to be met

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define major premise

A

A precedent explaining the truth

-rule of law, the standard to be met

17
Q

Define minor premise

A
  • States the truth respecting a matter of fact

- the facts that happen

18
Q

Define conclusion

A
  • states the truth
  • directly draws truths from the minor and major premises.
  • logical conclusion that follows applying the law on the facts
19
Q

Define evidence

A

Means a matter of ascertaining the truth respecting a matter of fact

20
Q

Define proof

A
  • The effect of evidence

- the truth respecting a matter of fact

21
Q

Define fact

A
  • A thing done, an action performed or an incident transpiring
  • a event or circumstance, an actual occurrence, an actual happening in time or space, or an event mental or physical some of which need not be proved.
22
Q

Define factual recital

A

Constitutes the ground of the judgement

23
Q

Define ground in Legal Logic

A

A statement specifying particular facts about a situation that is invoked to establish the truth, the correctness or soundness of the claim

-specific facts relied on to support a given claim

24
Q

Define warrant in legal logic

A

What authorizes the drawing of certain conclusion from a given set of facts.

-step-authorizing statement

25
Q

Define warrant of conclusioks

A

The law or relevant rule that authorizes that a conclusion be drawn from the facts adduced in evidence

26
Q

Define stare decisis

A

Obligates the court to follow historical cases when making a ruling

27
Q

Define stare decisis

A

Obligates the court to follow historical cases when making a ruling

28
Q

Define Backing in Legal Logic

A

Used by one who invokes a body of experience that is relied on to establish the trust worthiness o f one’s wat of arguing.

29
Q

What is obiter dictum?

A

Means observations made by the judge not essential for decision reached

30
Q

What is ratio decidendi?

A

Principle of law formulated by judge for purpose of deciding problem

31
Q

T/F

The conclusion is true because the reasoning is erroneous but because the legal or major premise is not properly quantified

A

False.

The conclusion is false because the reasoning is erroneous but because the legal or major premise is not properly quantified

32
Q

What does stare decisis get quieta non movere?

A

Stand by what has been decided & don’t disturb the established

33
Q

T/F

It is necessary that all facts of the case at bar correspond to the facts in the judicial precedent.

A

False

It is not necessary that all facts of the case at bar correspond to the facts in the judicial precedent.

34
Q

T/F

It is of the essence though that the key facts be similar and the constellation of facts be also similar

A

True

35
Q

Define key facts

A

Facts that produce a result which, if otherwise would yield a different result

36
Q

What’s constellation of facts

A

The arrangement of facts and their relation to each other

37
Q

These are considerations depended on whether differences are significant or similar

A
  1. Equity

2. Fairness

38
Q

It is the heart of common law, according to Senior Circuit judge Aldisert of the US Court of Appeals

A

Inductive reasoning

39
Q

What is false in unu, falsus in omnibus?

A

False in one thing, false in everything

40
Q

What is cumulative evidence?

A

Concurrence of indicators isore reliable accompanied by a constant willingness to re-think one’s position that in turn, presupposes a healthy intellectual humility and reticence