Locke Flashcards
What was L’s political context
there was growing conflict between the monarch and parliament: english civil war from 1642-51, eventual triumph of parliamentary and protestant power in 1688 glorious revolution, with L involved on the pro-parliament side through his family
what are the three purposes of the second treatise
refutation of absolute monarchy, defense of popular sovereignty and limited government, justification of (unequal) private property ownership
according to L, paternal power differs from
political power
what are the three purposes of political power for Locke
preserving property, defending the commonwealth, working for the public good
what is the scope of political power
making and executing laws, for the benefit of the community
what is L’s quote about human’s natural state
“a state of perfect freedom to order their actions, and dispose of their possessions and persons as they think fit, within the bounds of the law of nature, without asking leave, or depending upon the will of any other man”
- emphasis on being limited by the law of nature
L perceives the state of nature as a
state of equality
what does this status of equality obligate us to in L’s state of nature
self preservation, and preservation of others
what are 4 things that belong to you in L’s state of nature
life, liberty, property, health
According to L, how is the law of nature discovered
through reason
in L’s state of nature, what must there be
an enforcement mechanism of the law of nature
what are the two principles that can punish violations of the law of nature according to L
reparation and restraint
what is reparation according to L
duty to preserve ourselves
what is restraint according to L
stop people from committing future violations, duty to preserve mankind
T/F the punishments of a violation do not need to be proportional to the violation according to L
False, they must be proportional (cruel and unusual punishment)
for L why do we need to create a civil authority (in relation to the enforcement mechanism)
we are not good judges of our own cases (determining a violation or punishment)
therefore for L, the state of nature is a state
of inconvenience
what is the state of war for L
is a state of enmity and destruction where forceful attacks should be understood as violations of the law of nature, we are justified in responding as much as needed to protect ourselves and property
how is L different to H for punishment
L says we can only punish actual aggressors, not potential ones
according to L, the state of war is (duration)
limited, and most times the state of nature is peaceful
according to L, in the state of nature
it may be difficult to resolve the state of war
therefore according to L, why do we create a civil society
establish a common authority to judge disputes, limit the occurrence of a state of war
how can a state of war be started according to L
started by any sort of infringement, particularly by property
what is L’s conundrum with property
if God gave humans the Earth in common, how do you distribute it legitimately
what is L’s labor theory of value
if we own our bodies, we own our labor, mixing our labor with something joins it to us, makes it our property
what are L’s natural limits on property
must leave enough and as good, cannot take more than you can use