Local Process Flashcards
Is Local Process mandatory or optional?
Optional- pass an ordinance.
What is the 6 steps of Local Process?
1) lg Rec application.
2) w/i 10 days, lg Notices.
3) Preliminary decision made.
4) q-j w/ Spec Master, recomm to lg
5) lg Renders final decision w/ findings of fact, concl of law.
6) Appeal by writ.
Who is the descriptor of a party who can use Local Process?
An aggrieved or adversely affected party.
What can aggrieved or adversely affected party complain of?
LG decision on development order that MATERIALLY ALTERS DUI of prop based on CP.
What kind of notice is required in Local Process?
W/i 10 days of receiving an application for a dev order that materially alters DUI, LG must:
Publish
OR
Mail notice to Os in area
AND
Post on-site.
What are the dimensions of the printed Local Process notice?
Newspaper, 18 point, no less than 2 columns wide x 10 inches.
What are the contents of the Local Process Notice?
Explain procedure.
If LG wants to adopt a resolution/ordinance setting up Local Process, how must it notice its public?
1) LG provides Q-J before special master.
2) Q-J w/ witnesses, depositions, testimony, cross examine, public testimony, no ex parte.
3) LG bound by findings of fact - unless no comp subst eveidn.
4) LG bound by SM’s interp of law - unless incorrect law.
What is the nature of the hearing before the Special Master?
Q-J.
Is Special Master hearing public? Private?
Public. Public testimony MUST be allowed.
Is due process for SM’s Local Process hearing different than Board Q-Js?
Yes!
he Visits for a Drop of Tea with his SCONE.
———–
1) site Visit can be required.
2) Depositions
3) public Testimony MUST be allowed.
———–
4) Submit evidence.
5) Cross Examine,
6) Opp to be heard. ~but NO pub testimony~
7) Notice of Hearing.
8) No ex parte.
When is public testimony not wanted? Why?
———–
When is public testimony MANDATORY?
Q-J b/c need subst. competent.
———–
Local Process MANDATES Public Testimony.
What unique power does Spec Master have?
Can require everyone visit the site.
The Board acts akin to what in its review of Special Master’s decision?
Like circuit’s review of Q-J based on Code, Board looks:
1) For existence of substantial competent evidence.
2) To see that SM applied correct law.
Is Board bound by Spec Master’s conclusions of law?
Yes - UNLESS Spec Master applied incorrect law.
4) LG bound by SM’s interp of law - unless incorrect law.