Local Anesthetics Flashcards
LA MOA
Reversibly block generation, propagation of electrical impulses in nerves via blockade of VG Na channels
o Impedes membrane depolarization, nerve conduction/excitation
o Also block voltage-dependent K, Ca channels with lower affinity than VG Na
o +/- intracellular sites involved in signal transduction of GPCRs
NaV Channel Structure
o Large alpha (~2000 amino acids) with four domains that creates pore
o Each domain = 6 helical segments S1-S6, voltage sensor at S4 of each domain
o beta2/4 subunit, beta1/3
Influence activation, inactivation of states of channel
o Binding site at DIV-S6, intracellular access only
3 States of NaV
o Resting state = closed at RMP
o Open state = during depolarization, M gates open
o Inactivated state = closed, allows repolarization with H gates closed
Steps in NaV Activation
At RMP -70mV, m gate closed
S4 segment detects when MP reaches -55mV –> m/activation gate opens quickly
Opening of activation gate allows Na to flow into cell, raising MP to +30mV
At -55mV, inactivation gate (H gate) starts closing but closes MUCH slower
* 0.5-2msec
Once H gate closed, not capable of reopening for another 2-5msec –> allows membrane to repolarize, return to resting state
NaV Channel Distributions - cardiac m
1.1, 1.3, 1.5
NaV Channel Distributions - skeletal m
1.4
NaV Channel Distributions - CNS/PNS
1.1,2,3,5,6
NaV Channel Distribution - Pain
6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9
NaV 1.1, 1.3, 1.5?
Cardiac Cells
NaV 1.4?
Skeletal M
NaV 1.1, 2, 3, 5, 6?
CNS, PNS
NaV 1.7-1.9?
DRG
Modulated R Hypothesis
LAs: high affinity for channel in open, inactivated states; low affinity in resting state
Lipid-soluble (non-ionized, inactive) form enters via membrane
Lipid-insoluble (ionized, active) form enters through channel hydrophilic pore
* Only open when gates of channel open –> cumulative binding of LAs to Na channel when channels active
Which form of LA is lipid soluble?
The non-ionized, inactive form
Which form of LA is non-lipid soluble?
The ionized, active form
Guarded R Hypothesis
LAs bind to R inside channel w/ constant affinity, but channel must be open for access
Increasing frequency of stimulation increases # of Na channels open, increasess binding of LAs
Use-Dependent Block
Increased Frequency if stimulation increases # of NaV open –> increases binding of LAs
Applies to both Modulated R hypothesis, Guarded R Hypothesis
Biggest difference then becomes affinity of LA for R
Depth of block also increases with repetitive membrane depolarization
Tonic Block
blockade obtained on unstimulated nerves, is constant
Differential Blockade
Classified by Glasser, Erlanger in 1929
Basic principle: vasodilation –> sensory (temperature, sharp pain, light touch) –> motor
What is differential blockade affected by?
- Fiber length
- Length exposed to drug
- Myelination: can cause ax to pool adjacent to nerve
- Frequency of stimulation
- Drug concentration
- Drug properties
What is the critical length that a nerve must be exposed to to completely block the fiber?
3 Nodes of Ranvier
Longer fibers with longer distance btw NoR/greater internodal distance less susceptible to LA
Decremental Conduction
Decreased ability of successive NoR to propagate impulse in presence of LA
* 74-85% Na conduction blockade: progressive decrease in amplitude of impulse, until decays below threshold
* >84% Na conductance blocked at three consecutive nodes –> complete blockade of propagation
* Propagation of impulse can be stopped even if node has been rendered completely inexcitable
Clinical Effect of Decremental Conduction?
Why blocks with small volume/high concentration have greater duration and extent than large volume/low concentration despite same total drug dose
Sub Blocking Concentrations of LAs
Large portion of sensory information transmitted by peripheral nerves carried via coding of electrical signals in after-potentials, after oscillations
Suppress intrinsic oscillatory after-effects of impulse discharge without significantly affecting AP conduction
Possible mechanism of blockade: disruption of coding of electrical information
Other Actions when LAs Admin Centrally:
o Na channel blockade
o K, Ca channels: dorsal horn of spinal cord, altered sensory processing
o Substance P binding (tachykinin), evoked increase iCa
o Glutaminergic transmission –> decreased NMDA, neurokinin-mediated transmission
o Targeting of large nerves, nerve trunk (BP, LST): somatosensory arrangement of nerve fibers also affects progression of block
Chemical Structure
Lipophilic aromatic (benzene) ring
Hydrophilic amine group (tertiary or quaternary amine)
Intermediate chain linkage - ester or amide
Esters
O-C; hydrolyzed by plasma esterases (one i)
o Procaine
o Tetracaine
o Chloroprocaine
Amides
Metabolized by liver (two is)
o Lidocaine
o Ropivacaine
o Bupivacaine, levobupivacaine
o Mepivacaine
Chirality
mostly racemic mixture that 50:50 R-, S-
Which three LAs are achiral?
- Tetracaine
- Prilocaine
- Lidocaine
Which two LAs are pure S isomers?
Levobupivacaine, ropivacaine
Difference btw R, S enantiomer
o R-enantiomers assoc with greater in vitro potency, greater therapeutic efficacy but also increased CV, CNS toxicity
LA Activity - not important factors
Diffusion coefficient, MW not important factors in determining activity
MW very similar btw LAs, 220-228Da
pKa of Locals
WEAK BASES
Formulated as acid solutions
Formulation of LAs
acidic HCl solutions (pH 4-7)
Formulation in acidic solutions increases CHECK THIS ionized portion –> improves H2O solubility
Locals with Higher pKas
Increased pKa –> increased BH+ at physiologic pH (7.4) (increased ionization) –> slow onset
Higher pKa, more drug ionized at physiologic pH – ionized form = ACTIVE
* More ionized form, more drug to interact with receptor
* BUT moves more slowly across hydrophobic cell membrane, thus slower onset
LA with Lower pKas
(eg lidocaine): more uncharged base, faster onset
o Once intracellular, becomes ionized – interact with R
Role of Lipid Solubility
determines penetration of nerve cell membrane
Increased lipid solubility –> increased potency, decreased concentration needed for blockade
More lipid soluble, better penetration through lipid membrane, faster onset in unmyelinated nerves
Effect of Myelination on Onset of LA
delayed onset DT trapping in myelin, other lipid compartments
* Net effect of ing lipid solubility = delayed onset of LAs
* Increased duration due depot for slow release of drug
Protein Binding
Only free drug active: increased protein binding –> increases duration of action
Don’t know why: Likely related to membrane or extracellular proteins in membrane
Onset
pKa, lipid solubility, concentration, volume, frequency of membrane stimulation, pH of site
Addition of HCO3 to increase pH –> promotes more un-ionized base to be present to hasten onset B > BH+ (contradicting studies
Ex: LAs will not work around infected abscess with acidic pH
Potency?
Correlates to lipid Solubility
Duration?
Protein binding
site of administration, vasomotor tone
Differential Blockade?
fiber size, length, myelin, frequency of stimulation, concentration, drug properties
Which LAs show greater differential blockade?
Amides
Increased pKa
Decreased lipid solubility
More potent blockade of C fibers than fast-conducting A fibers
Benefits of Differential Blockade?
More differential blockade, more sparing of certain types of nerve fibers
At higher concentrations, drug properties become less important for differential blockade
* High concentration of ANY LA, differential blockade goes away
B > C = Adelta > Agamma > Abeta >Aalpha
Drink Good Beer Always
Absorption Factors
Site of injection, vascularity
Intrinsic lipid solubility
Vasoactivity of agent
Dose admin
Additives, other formulation factors that modify local drug residence, release
Influence of nerve block in region (VD)
Pathophysiologic state of patient
Why is systemic absorption important?
Lower systemic absorption, greater margin of safety
Increased vascularity…
Increased absorption
Increased peak plasma concentration (Cmax)
Decreased time to peak plasma concentration (Tmax)
Intercostal > epidural > brachial plexus > femoral/sciatic
* Study only done using those sites
* Related to differences in vascularity
* Intrathecal much lower systemic absorption than epidural
What is the order of block absorption?
Intercostal > epidural > brachial plexus > femoral/sciatic
* Study only done using those sites
* Related to differences in vascularity
* Intrathecal much lower systemic absorption than epidural
What features increase absorption?
–Decreased lipid solubility, decreased protein binding
Lidocaine, mepivacaine > bupivacaine, ropivacaine
Increased lipid sol, increased protein binding = less absorption – bind to neural, non-neural lipid-rich tissues so less systemic absorption
Vasoactivity of LAs
Most LAs cause vasodilation, which decreases time to peak plasma concentrations (increases Tmax)
Ropivacaine, levobupivacaine = vasoconstriction, Tmax
Toxicity
lower Tmax (less time to reach peak plasma concentration), higher Cmax (higher peak plasma concentrations)
Greatest risk systemic toxicity: Tmax arterial blood, 5-45’ after inj depending on site of block, speed of inj, drug
Risk of systemic toxicity coincides with Tmax, independent of dose
Faster speed of injection, increased Cmax (peak plasma concentration
Distribution
Degree of tissue distribution, protein binding related to apparent volume of distribution at steady state (Vdss): free fraction governs tissue concentration
Usually paralleled by degree of protein binding
Distribution of Amino-Esters
rapid plasma hydrolysis by pseudocholinesterases, limited distribution
Distribution of Amino-Amides
Widely Distributed
-Can be affected by a1-acid glycoprotein (AAG) concentrations
-pulmonary first pass effect
a1 Acid glycoprotein (AAG)
- Increased AAG –> increase TOTAL LA concentration, but NOT free (active) fraction (amides)
- AAG = acute phase reaction protein produced by the liver in response to inflammation
- Normally low in plasma, serum concentrations can increase 2-5x
- Academic > clinical
Pulmonary First Pass (Depot Effect)
risk of toxicity with R–>L cardiac shunts
Normal: temporarily increases plasma concentration of drug, lungs able to attenuate toxic effects after accidental IA injection
* Mostly dependent on lipid solubility, pKa
o More lipid soluble agents –> more pulmonary uptake
o Lower pKas = greater unionized form, which accumulates in the lung
Consequences of R to L Shunt with Pulmonary First Pass/Depot Effect
- Some of drug will bypass first pass due to shunt
- Increased toxicity so increase dose CLINICALLY RELEVANT
- Most pulmonary first pass: bupivacaine > etidocaine > lidocaine, levobupivacaine > ropivacaine
Rapid distribution goes where?
Milk, muscle
Drugs that diffuse most readily into milk
relatively lipophilic, unionized (Lower pKa), not strongly protein bound, low MWs
FARAD: recommends 24hr meat, milk withhold on lidocaine
Placental Transfer
Limited for esters due to rapid metabolism, enhanced for amides by “ion trapping”
Unionized form rapidly crosses placenta –> once in more acidic fetal circulation, ionized drug forms more readily –> gets “stuck” in fetal circulation
Back transfer from fetus to mother occurs with bupivacaine, NOT lidocaine
Degree of LA binding to both maternal, fetal plasma proteins also important determinant of placental transfer of LAs
- Only unbound, free drug crosses placenta
- Fetal AAG content, binding < maternal, F:M of highly protein-bound LAs lower than less-protein bound
o Ex: bupivacaine F:M 0.36, lidocaine F:M 1.0
Fetal Metabolism of LAs
Fetus/neonate able to metabolize, eliminate lidocaine better than bupivacaine
- If high plasma concentrations of local in maternal blood likely, potentially delay delivery if bupivacaine to allow bup to transfer back to maternal circulation
- Do not have to delay delivery if lidocaine bc ion trapped, can eliminate just fine
Poor water solubility of LAs…
Limited renal excretion
Amino Esters metabolism and excretion
Hydrolyzed by plasma pseudocholinesterases, excreted in urine
* Additional contributions from esterases in RBCs, liver, synovial fluid
* Chloroprocaine = most rapid clearance, fast hydrolysis rate
* Procaine IV admin in horses: t1/2 = 50’, Vd 6.7L/kg
* Hydrolysis products of procaine, chloroprocraine, tetracaine = pharmacologically inactive
Cocaine
- Illegal use in race horses, dogs
- Ester hydrolysis in plasma; N-demethylation in liver to norcocaine, which undergoes further hydrolysis
Benzocaine, Procaine
para-aminobenzoic acid metabolite allergic reaction
* Why esters more assoc with allergic reactions than amides
Benzocaine - other SE
metHb in people, dogs, cats
* Proposed MOA: direct oxidation of heme
Amino Amides Metabolism
Metabolized by CYP-450 system, excreted urine/bile
* Phase I: hydroxylation, N-dealkylation, N-demethylation
* Phase II reactions: metabolites conjugated with amino acids or glucuronide into less active, inactive metabolites
Amino Amide Excretion
Small portion excreted unchanged in urine
* Humans: 4-7% lidocaine, 6% bupivacaine, 16% mepivacaine
* 1.7-29% lidocaine in horses
Clearance of Amino Amides
Prilocaine > etidocaine > lidocaine > mepivacaine > ropivacaine > bupivacaine
* In humans, prilocaine cleared most rapidly: blood clearance values exceed hepatic blood flow, indicating extrahepatic metabolism
Prilocaine Metabolism
O-toluidine (orthotoluidine) –> oxidizes Hgb to metHb
Lidocaine Metabolism
MEGX/GX –> toxicity after prolonged infusions (esp renal failure, diabetes)
* Hydroxylation, demethylation in liver
* MEGX = monoethylglycinexylidide
o Activity 70% of lidocaine, potentially contributes to toxicity after long infusions
* GX = glycinexylidide (also active)
* Metabolites NOT detected in cows