Local and systemic antimicrobials in the management of inflammatory periodontal diseases Flashcards

1
Q

How is plaque controlled mechanically?

A

Pt performed
Non-surgical root surface cleaning
Surgical root surface cleaning (flap)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

When are systemic antimicrobials used with mechanical treatment?

A
Aggressive forms of periodontitis
Necrotising forms of PD (NUG, NUP)
Perio abscess
Deep perio pockets not responding to RSD
Progressive or active disease
Guided tissue regeneration
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Examples of antimicrobials for systemic use

A
 Tetracyclines (historical)
 Metronidazole
 Combinations of
metronidazole and amoxicillin
 Azithromycin
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How to treat aggressive periodontitis?

A

Metronidazole (400mg) and amoxicillin (500mg) both TDS, 7
days
Azithromycin 500mg daily for 3 days

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How to treat pockets not responding to RSD - progressive or active disease?

A

Amoxicillin / metronidazole
combination
Azithromycin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How to treat periodontal abscesses?

A

 Metronidazole
 Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid
 Azithromycin
 Tetracycline

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Negatives of Azithromycin?

A

Can prolong QTc interval -also an effect of some other drugs – increased risk of abnormal heart rhythm
• Interaction with statins
• Must check BNF / check with pharmacist or GP if in doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are the problems of evaluating systemic antibiotics?

A

 Prospective, randomized placebo-controlled,
double blind trial ideal
 Majority of older studies fall short
 Evidence base emerging following more recent studies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Systematic review evidence for systemic antimicrobials?

A

(Herrera et al. 2002)
• Additional benefit (CAL/PPD) - deep pockets
• Reduced risk of further CAL loss - progressive or
“active” disease
• Aggressive disease - might have adjunctive benefit
• Amoxicillin and metronidazole combination
If systemic antibiotics are to be used, they should commence at the completion of RSD, which should be completed within one week (Herrera et al. 2008)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evidence for azithromycin?

A

Improved outcomes in chronic periodontitis in deep pockets:

- Smith et al

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Advantages of systemic antimicrobials?

A
Useful for aggressive / active / progressing sites
(pus formation)
Multiple sites
Low cost
Less clinical time
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Disadvantages of systemic antimicrobials?

A
 Dependent on patient compliance
 Unwanted side effects
 Can produce microbial resistance to
antimicrobials
 Can lead to sensitivities and allergies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Examples of locally applied antimicrobials?

A
 Metronidazole (Elyzol)
 Chlorhexidine (PerioChip) (Chlosite
gel)
 Minocycline (Dentomycin)*
 Doxycycline (Atridox)*
(* no longer available in UK
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Indications for locally applied antimicrobials?

A

FEW SITES
POOR RESPONSE TO DEBRIDEMENT
DEEP SITES IN MAINTENANCE PATIENTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is metronidazole 25%? How does it work?

A

Semi-solid suspension gel (25% metronidazole)
• Forms “liquid crystals” on contact with water
• Water in matrix dissolves metronidazole –
diffuses into surroundings
• Stable for 3 years if above 25 degrees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How to use metronidazole?

A

• Subgingival debridement first
• Syringe into pocket until over
flowing – wipe off excess
• Reapply one week later

17
Q

Does metronidazole gel work?

A

 Effective antimicrobial conc. < 1 day
 Substantial amount swallowed
- Ainamo et al J Clin. Periodontol. 1992 ;19:723-729

18
Q

Does Elyzol work?

A

May enhance effects of SRP
Not for treatment of refractory or aggressive
periodontitis, periodontitis in patients with
predisposing illness or those under medical
treatment, grade III furcations
Contra-indicated in patients allergic to sesame seeds
and other precautions

19
Q

When is elyzols preferred use?

A

As an adjunct - slow progessing periodontitis, grade II furcations, angular bony defects

20
Q

What is periochip? How does it work?

A

Chlorhexidine digluconate 2.5 mg in gelatine
• Minimum depth > 5mm
• Biodegrades releasing
chlorhexidine over 7–10 days

 PerioChip replaced at 3m & 6m, if PD > 4mm remained
 At 9m: Significant  PD &  AL in PerioChip group

21
Q

Does periochip work?

A

• Enhanced effects of SRP especially deep sites
• Gain in bone noted and/or no loss, whereas 25% showed bone loss
with SRP alone

22
Q

What is chlosite?

A

Xanthan gel and chlorhexidine (0.5% as digluconate and 1.0% dihydrochloride)

23
Q

When and how to use minocycyline 2%?

A

• Moderate to severe chronic periodontiitis
• Adjunct to root surface debridement of
sites  5mm in depth
• Not to be repeated within 6 months

24
Q

What is doxycycline 8.5%? How does it work?

A
 Gel that solidifies in minutes
 Does not flush out
 Sustained release 7-10 days
 Absorbed and does not require removal
 Effective against periodontal pathogens
25
Q

Does atridox work?

A
  • Enhanced effects of root surface debridement
  • Works in smokers
  • Suggested use for non-responding sites
  • No longer available in UK
26
Q

Advantages of locally applied antimicrobials?

A

 High local concentration of antimicrobial with
minimum unwanted side effects
 Less reliance on patient compliance
 Useful for isolated sites

27
Q

Negatives of locally applied antimicrobials?

A

 More expensive

 Effective?

28
Q

Do locally applied antimicrobials work?

A

Additional improvement in probing and clinical
attachment (mean < 1mm) v RSD alone
Increased number of sites with PPD reductions
≥ 2mm

Conflicting evidence on the use of chlorhexidine in a gelatin chip (Cosyn
and Wyn, 2006)
Insufficient evidence to support the use of a chlorhexidine
gel (Cosyn and Sabzevar, 2005)