LO5 - Human Evolution and Genetics Flashcards
Nature
This links to the idea of nativism - everything we know about the world is innate and genetic. It is this that determines behaviour.
Nurture
This links to empiricism - we are born with a tabula rasa and nothing in terms of behaviour and knowledge is inherited. Everything is learned.
Our past experiences determine individual differences.
Interactionism
We are born with some behaviours but our experiences can influence our behaviour and how it is expressed in the future. Experiences can also change which innate behaviours are expressed.
What is expressed in the future is based on the interaction between nature and nurture.
Nativism
Most of the knowledge we have is innate (view held by Descartes) and we are born with it. It is this alone that determines out behaviour.
It is associated with the nature side of the debate and genetics. We can look at genetics and inherited characteristics to explain behaviour.
Empiricism
We are born as a blank slate with no innate behavioural knowledge. Everything we know is learnt.
Watson and Locke held this view. It is associated with nurture. We need to look at a child’s individual history to understand their behaviour.
Proximate causation
The close causes: these are the things related to the internal changes of an animal such as hormonal state, learning and experiences.
This explains how an animal produces a behaviour and takes a reductionist approach.
Ultimate causation
This is related to evolutionary causes of behaviour (why an animal behaves the way it does).
Functionalism is interested in this question.
Species
A group of animals that can mate, do mate and produce fertile offspring.
Genus
A group of species that have evolved from a common ancestor
Family
All of the genera that originate from the same ancestor.
Homo Erectus
This was the first from our genus that left Africa. They were very conservative and used the same tools. They didn’t have the flexibility and development of culture that Homo Sapiens have.
While it could create tools, it could not adapt in the same way.
Homo neandertahlensis
Another species within our genus. The migrated out of Africa in a different route to Homo Erectus.
Their DNA is found in modern humans (mostly Asians and Europeans).
They mated with Homo Sapiens at some point.
Homo Sapiens
This is our species. We used to coexist with other Homo species.
What differentiates us is our large brain. We are a young species but had the most flexible culture which showed the most development.
We also moved out of Africa. Our increased brain size sparked the cognitive revolution.
Out of Africa Hypothesis
We came from Africa. The first Homo genus were born there and from there we left and explored the planet.
Homo Erectus was the first to explore the planet and entered Europe and Asia.
Multi-regional hypothesis
This is the idea of several migratory waves out of Africa. Includes the different routes that the different species within Homo genus took.
Another group of Homo evolves from the earlier group and continues to migrate.
It is not simply in Africa that humans evolved.
Cognitive revolution
This is characterised by the explosion in brain size that distinguishes us from our ancestors.
Humans have cultural abilities, lifestyles and interactions that Homo Erectus was not capable of because of brain size.
The brain is an enormous energy sink and the size of it is the result of a random nutation in one gene.
Consequences of the cognitive revolution
We have to spend more time looking for food to feed our brain.
Humans are born prematurely because of our skull size. Babies are very plastic and are helpless for a long time.
Raising children is a shared responsibility. We cook with fire which increases the nutritional density of food.
Language is far more complex. Helps us survive by communicating, planning etc.
Language also lets us talk about theories and allows for rapid innovation.
Agricultural revolution
Around 8000 years ago, hunter-gatherers settled down and agriculture emerged and animals were domesticated.
We discovered food grew from seeds and animals could be tamed. Shift in culture occurred. We required permanent houses near our crops.
Consequences of agricultural revolution
Ownership as a concept emerged. You protect the things you think are yours.
Larger societal structures emerged e.g. villages/cities. We are not adapted to this.
Diet changes - it got worse as we only eat the crop we grow. Cohabitation with animals resulted in disease.
Loss of knowledge - in one generation all nomadic knowledge was lost.
We had to work harder - plants and animals require more labour.
Advantages of the agricultural revolution
We could have more children at once. This was also needed to look after the crops.
No need to carry children around. It didn’t matter so much when one child dies.
Population grew a lot.
Scientific Revolution
We developed methods that allowed us to explore the nature of things. We are able to control nature to an extent and the introduction of science ensured our survival despite not being at the top of the food chain.
The Anthropocene
We are in a position now to modify the entire biosphere due to our knowledge and lifestyle. This may be the last phase if we are not cautious.
We have manipulated the planet so much that it may not be able to habitate us anymore.
Gene
Within each cell’s nucleus we have strands of genetic material (chromosomes) which contain DNA which is used to express certain traits.
DNA produces nRNA which codes the building block proteins of an organism. DNA contains all the genes that low a cell to function.
Chromosomes
46 chromosomes contain all of our genetic material. Each cell contains many mitochondria that contain their own DNA meaning there is more than one set of genetic material in each cell.
Our chromosomes look similar to chimps but other organisms have far more pairs - the number does not relate to advanced development.