little albert Flashcards

1
Q

what was the aim?

`

A

to demonstrate that simple emotional responses such as fear can be acquired through a process of classical conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what were the two conditions of the independent variable?

A

presence/abscence of a loud noise paired with the sight of a rat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what happened in session 1?

A

albert was 11m and 3 days and he was taken to a lab where there was a rat
- when he reached for the rat, a metal bar was struck loudly just behind his head

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what happened in session 2?

A

a week later albert returned
- he was exposed 5 times to the paired rat and loud noise
- he was then tested with blocks to which he showed no fear response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what happened in session 3?

A

5 days later albert returned and his responses to the rat and other things was tested
- the other objects included wooden blocks, a rabbit, a dog, a fur coat, and watson’s hair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what happened in session 4?

A

5 days later, albert was taken to a new environment and was placed on a table and again his response to those objects happened again

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what happened in session 5?

A

albert was tested again 1 month later which included a santa claus mask, fur coast, the rat, the rabbit and a dog

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what were the findings ?

A

at basline testing he showed no fear to the objects but mild fear to the loud noise.
- at session 1 he cried at the loud noise
- at session 2 he was more cautious towards the rat - not reaching out
- session 3, albert crawled away from white furry objects - ra, rabbit and displayed mild fear towards the dog
- in sessions 4 and 5 aberts fear to white furry objects remained but were milder when he was in a different place

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the conclusion?

A

it is relatively easy to condition an emotional response to a neutral stimuli
- two sessions = fear response
he experienced stimulus generalisation as he became fearful of other white furry things too

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is a strength?

A

the design had clever features that reduced the impact of extreneous variables which increased validity
- little albert was chosen because of his emotional stability
- the procedure took place in a well controlled room to prevent the influence of other stimuli

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what is the competing argument of the strength?

A

some aspects of the design were not controlled
- the rabbit was suddenly placed in front of him
- the dog was pushed towards him
these actions may have triggered a fear response rather than the objects themselves

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is a weakness?

A

it only used one ppt who may have been unusual
- this lacks generalisability because the individual studied may not be representative

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

how can it be applied?

A

has clinical applications in helping understand how we acquire phobias
- this has led to the development of effective therapies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly