List of Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Dogmatism

A

Insisting one’s beliefs are unquestionably correct, ignoring evidence or counterarguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Invincible Ignorance

A

Refusing to accept compelling contrary evidence or arguments.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Wishful Thinking

A

Believing something because one desires it to be true, disregarding evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Cherry-Picking Evidence

A

Selecting only evidence that supports one’s argument while ignoring contradictory evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Appeal to Consequences

A

Judging an argument’s validity based on the desirability of its conclusions, rather than evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Confirmation Bias

A

Seeking and favoring information that confirms existing beliefs, ignoring or dismissing contradictory evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Equivocation

A

Using a word or phrase with multiple meanings inconsistently within the same argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Ambiguity

A

Statements that have multiple valid interpretations, making the intended meaning unclear.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Vagueness

A

Lack of specificity or precision, making the exact meaning uncertain.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Argument from Ignorance

A

Claiming something is true because it hasn’t been proven false (or vice versa).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Shifting the Burden of Proof

A

Forcing others to disprove one’s claim rather than providing evidence oneself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Special Pleading

A

Exempting one’s claim from the burden of proof without justification.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Straw Man Fallacy

A

Misrepresenting or exaggerating an opponent’s argument to easily refute it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Misquoting Out of Context

A

Distorting meaning by isolating statements from their intended context.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

False Dichotomy

A

Reducing complex issues to only two extreme options, ignoring nuanced perspectives.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Circular Reasoning (Begging the Question)

A

Assuming the conclusion within premises, offering no independent evidence.

17
Q

Contradictory Premises

A

Using premises that logically conflict with each other.

18
Q

Denying the Antecedent

A

Incorrectly assuming the falsity of an antecedent condition disproves the consequent result.

19
Q

Red Herring

A

Introducing unrelated points to distract from the main issue.

20
Q

Ad Hominem

A

Attacking the person rather than addressing their argument.

21
Q

Genetic Fallacy

A

Evaluating an argument based solely on its origin rather than its evidence or merit.

22
Q

Appeal to Questionable Authority

A

Using the testimony of an unqualified or irrelevant source as evidence.

23
Q

Slippery Slope

A

Assuming a minor action will inevitably lead to extreme consequences without sufficient evidence.

24
Q

False Dilemma

A

Presenting an issue as having only two extreme options, ignoring viable alternatives.

25
Q

Hasty Generalization

A

Drawing broad conclusions from insufficient or unrepresentative evidence.

26
Q

Anecdotal Evidence

A

Relying primarily on personal stories or isolated incidents as proof.

27
Q

Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc

A

Assuming one event caused another simply because it occurred first.

28
Q

Ignoring Counterevidence

A

Disregarding opposing evidence or arguments.

29
Q

Poisoning the Well

A

Preemptively discrediting the opponent rather than addressing their argument.

30
Q

No True Scotsman

A

Arbitrarily redefining criteria to dismiss counterexamples.

31
Q

Appeal to Ignorance

A

Assuming a claim is true (or false) simply because it hasn’t been proven otherwise.

32
Q

False Compromise

A

Assuming the truth always lies between two opposing views.

33
Q

Argument to Moderation

A

Assuming a moderate position is inherently correct without considering the evidence.

34
Q

Moving the Goalposts

A

Arbitrarily changing the resolution criteria after they’ve been met.

35
Q

Ignoring Resolution Criteria

A

Refusing to acknowledge agreed-upon criteria even when they’ve been satisfied.