Light Flashcards
What happens to our wave equation if we apply boundary conditions in two hard walls separated by length L?
boundary conditions demand 0 amplitude
in the unbound case, what happens to our wave equation if the wave moves in time?
if it moves in time it must also have a period
What is special about a time varying wave with a frequency=1/T?
in one period wave moves by one wavelength, so that the phase velocity |as d=v×t| v=λ/T| ω=vk (=λ2π/Tλ)|this is the dispersion relation of the wave
What do we need to add to complete our definition of the wave?
we need to specify its initial state usually at t=x=0|we do this by introducing a phase factor
What is the principle of superposition? |What is constructive interference? |what is destructive interference?
waves that overlap add up to their vector sum ||occurs when the two waves are in phase creating a wave with twice the amplitude ||occurs when the waves are completely out of phase creating a wave with zero amplitude.
What are coherent waves?
source that emits waves that all have the same phase relationship is said to be a coherent source.
How was young’s double slit experiment proof for the wave nature of light?
- if light was a particle, it would pass through the first slit and hit the second wall so none would hit the screen.|2. instead he observed an interference pattern with maxima and minima. A pattern which we’d expect from a wave…||- the first slit turns the light into a coherent source (as slit smaller than wavelength)|-the coherent light then proceeds to the next two slits which both set up different coherent light sources |-the two spherical waves will cause an interference pattern because at any given angle the two wavefronts have travelled a different distance from the slits and are therefore out of phase. |- If we assume the screen is far away then we can assume the angle between each slit and a point on the screen is the same.||∆L=L1-L2|sinθ=∆L/d|∆L=dsinθ
How can we make calculations from the path difference and positions of maxima and minima in youngs double slit experiment.
maxima at path difference= integer multiples of wavelength |we must have d≥λ to get a maxima ||minima at path difference is a half a wavelength more than an integer multiple of the wavelength||we can use trig to work out the angle to a minima/maxima |-we can then use knowledge of which order maxima it is, distance between slits and angle to work out the wavelength of light from the interference pattern.
geometric optics indicates light as a particle but youngs experiment indicates it as a wave, how can both be true?
if wavelength of light much smaller than any of the relevant physical distances, then we can ignore most of the wave properties and think of light as acting as a particle. wavelength 500nm so this applies to all geometric optics||but in experiment, slit small compared to the wavelength of light so we must treat light as a wave.
What is the set up of michelson-morely experiment?
- beam of collumnated light shone at a partially reflective mirror |2. part of the light is reflected at one mirror and the rest is transmitted to another |3. the light bounces off each mirror and then comes back to the partially reflective mirror |4. part of the reflected beam is diverted to a screen. The two beams are out of phase (due to reflection) so an interference pattern will occur.|-a series of interference fringes are produced due to mirrors not being perfectly parallel so phase mismatch depends on part of the mirror light bounced off.
How do we use the set up in the michelson-morely experiment to disprove the existence of the ether?
In the michelson morley experiment… |they theoretically knew that when light in static conditions interfere they will form the maxima and minima at the calculated values i.e. the fringe width or the distance between two maximas was known.||so if light travels through ether, then due to the ether drag (as earth was moving through it) the speed of light must change in both the perpendicular and longitudinal direction. |(this can be understood by taking the analogy of a boat moving in a river, when boat travels in longitudinal direction to the river its direction is governed by its velocity in still water plus/ minus the velocity of stream(In this case the speed of earth travelling through ether) based upon its direction.|whereas when it travels perpendicular to the stream of water, its velocity is simply found by the vector addition of the two velocities.) ||now since the velocity of light is now changed in two directions the wavelength must change (c=fλ); frequency remains same as it is the property of source not the medium through which the light is travelling) |now since the wavelength changes thus we can compute the interference pattern of the two sources by simple calculation and hence the new fringe width or distance between two maximas. therefore the distance between two maxima should have changed. ||from that change it could have been confirmed that light travels trough ether but the result came out that there was no change or shift in the two maximas and the result was same as in static conditions. |Therefore no ether
What are the implications of the michelson-morely experiment?
- there is no ether (since we are not moving through it) so there is no medium in which light is propagating.|light does not need a medium to propogate|2. The speed of light is the same regardless of the relative motion of the observer||these implications led Einstein to go onto discover the world of special relativity
what are the consequences of the theory of special relativity
TIME DILATION |a clock that is moving with respect to an observer appears to tick more slowly than a clock at rest |LENGTH CONTRACTION|if an object is moving with respect to an observer, it appears to get smaller |LOSS OF SIMULTANEITY |two events that occur at the same time for a stationary observer do not necessarily occur simultaneously for a moving observer.
What is relativistic momentum?
for a particle moving with velocity v, the classical momentum is defined as p=mv |but after taking relativity into account…||for very small v, γ∼1 so is the same as the classical definition. |if the particle moves close to the speed of light, its momentum will be quite different.
What is relativistic energy?
the classical definition of kinetic energy of a particle is given by K=1/2mv² |relativity requires this to change to |K=γmc²-mc²||total energy…|E=mc² + K = mc² +γmc² - mc² | =γmc²||with some manipulation, we can write this as |E²=(pc)² + (mc²)²