LIberty Flashcards

1
Q

Why is it important to have political theory?

A

Because, at no point in history, have so many been affected by fanatical commitments to social and political doctrines

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is there a danger if trained scholars do not attend ideas?
(Quote)

A

‘They often acquire an unchecked momentum and an irresistible power over multitudes of men that may grow too violent to be affected by rational criticism’
Berlin, 1958

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What does Berlin mean by ‘negative liberty’?

A

‘By being free in this sense I mean not being interfered with by others. The wider the area of non-interference, the wider my freedom’
(Quote)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What, for Hobbes, does freedom mean?
(Quote)

A

‘[A] Free-man is he that is able to do [and] is not hindered to do what he has a will to’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What, to Hobbes, are you free from if you are a ‘Free-man [from] those things which by his strength and wit he is able to do [and] is not hindered to do what he has a will to’

A

You are free from ‘external impediments’ to motion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What, to Locke, is Freedom?
(Quote)

A

‘[liberty] is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule.’
Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government, 1690

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does Locke mean when he states that freedom is:
‘The natural liberty of man is to be free from any superior power on earth, and not to be under the will or legislative authority of man, but to have only the law of nature for his rule.’
(Locke, Second Treatise of Civil Government, 1690)

A

To be free from both the external impediments of motion and external impediments of the will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What does Mill mean when he says that ‘The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way.’

A

That we have freedom from external and internal impediments to motion and wil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What, to Mill, is liberty?

A

‘Freedom [is] pursuing our own good in our own way.’
Mill, On Liberty, 1859

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are Berlin’s three observations concerning Mill?

A

*Confuses two concepts of liberty: ‘classical’ negative conception, and that self-fulfillment develops a progressive character
*Modern
*Notion that liberty is not incompatible with certain kinds of autocracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is a quote from Berlin concerning a notion that liberty is not incompatible with certain kinds of autocracy

A

There is a difference between ‘freedom from’ and ‘freedom to’ that has ‘led in the end to the great clash of ideologies that dominates our world. for it is this, the ‘positive’ conception of liberty […] which the adherents of the ‘negative’ notion represent as being, at times, not better than a specious disguise for brutal tyranny.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What does Mill mean when he says that ‘The only freedom which deserves the name is that of pursuing our own good in our own way.’

A

That we have freedom from external and internal impediments to motion and will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Berlin mean by ‘positive liberty’?

A

That one is free insofar as one acts in accordance with one’s true desires or interests, or in such a way that helps me to realise my human nature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Finish this long quote about Berlin’s critique of positive liberty:
‘This [positive liberty] renders it easy fro me to conceive of myself as…’

A

… coercing others for their own sake, in their, not my interest. I am then claiming that i know what they truly need better than they know it themselves. What, at most, this entails is that they would not resist me if they were rational, and as wise as I, and understood their interests as I do.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When does tension between the negative and positive conception of freedom arise?

A

When individual is regarded as mistaken about their own rational interests – regarded as engaging in actions contrary to their ‘true’ selves’ – autonomy understood as mastery of lesser aspects of self

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the conception of an individual being regarded as mistaken about their own rational interests – regarded as engaging in actions contrary to their ‘true’ selves’ – autonomy understood as mastery of lesser aspects of self called in Marxist tradition

A

False consciousness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Define false consciousness in Marx’s words
(Quote)

A

‘To the degree to which they correspond to the given reality, thought and behaviour express a false consciousness, responding to and contributing to the preservation of a false order of facts’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What can be seen within positive freedom?

A

Asceticism

19
Q

What is a quote that can define asceticism in positive freedom?

A

The ‘retreat to the inner citadel’

20
Q

What does Berlin mean by the ‘retreat to the inner citadel’

A

That political isolationism, economic autarky, and all autonomy, has in it some element of eliminating obstacles in my path by abandoning the path

21
Q

What is this level of asceticism similar to?

A

Kant’s notion of freedom as willed self-compulsion to overcome irrational passions and obey the law

22
Q

What is another way of looking at the positive doctrine of liberty?

A

By reason

23
Q

Who are some proponents that support the positive doctrine of liberation by reason?

A

Hegel, Herder, and Marx

24
Q

What does Berlin align positive liberty with?

A

Self-control or self-direction, rather than negative liberty – a field without obstacles

25
Q

What is the enlightenment ideal of freedom as rational self-direction associated with?

A

A belief that will to domination (an irrational will) would die away with the creation of a rational society

26
Q

What does the enlightenment ideal of freedom as rational self-direction assume? Why is this an issue?

A

It assumes that rational people would share the same conception of a desired end

27
Q

What, essentially, is this enlightenment push?

A

An enlightenment push of rational self-determination predicated upon reason

28
Q

What does Berlin think about an enlightenment push of rational self-determination predicated upon reason

A

That it vulnerable to irrationalism

29
Q

Finish the quote:
‘This is the argument used by every dictator […] who…

A

… seeks some moral, or even aesthetic, justification for his conduct. I must do for men (or with them) what they cannot do for themselves [without their consent]’.

30
Q

In Kant’s argument for rational laws, what else did he say?

A

that it could not derive someone of rational freedom

31
Q

With Kant’s claim that rational laws could not deprive someone of rational freedom, what happened?

A

‘With this the door was opened wide to the rule of experts, which leads to despotism, albeit by the best and wisest.’

32
Q

In this despotism with freedom, what 3 things could be wrong?

A
  1. The premise the that all humans have on true purpose;
  2. All rational beings fit into one universal patter, wherein some see more clearly than others
  3. All conflict derives from rational against irrational
33
Q

What is the ambiguity in the concept of liberty?

A

That fights for freedom have generally been fights for the right to self-determination, not fights for liberty

34
Q

What then, is the fundamental conflict between negative and positive liberty?

A

That advocates of negative liberty ‘want to curb authority as such’, whilst advocates of positive liberty ‘want it placed in their own hands’

35
Q

What does Berlin say about the fundamental conflict between advocates of negative liberty ‘want[ing] to curb authority as such’, whilst advocates of positive liberty ‘want[ing] it placed in their own hands’

A

That ‘each of them makes absolute claims. These claims cannot be both fully satisfied.’

36
Q

What, to Berlin, is ‘responsible for the sluaghter of individuals on the altars of the great historical beliefs’?

A

That there is a ‘final solution’

37
Q

What does this ‘final solution’ rely upon?

A

That, in the end, all positive values must be compatible, and perhaps entail one another

38
Q

What is the problem of the conclusion that all positive values must be compatible and entail one another?

A

That there is no empirical evidence.

39
Q

What does Berlin believe follows from incompatibility of human ends?

A

That if the ends of men are many, and not all of them are in principle compatible, then the possibility of conflict – and of tragedy – can never wholly be eliminated from human life

40
Q

Which, positive or negative liberty, does Berlin take to be more compatible with pluralism?

A

Negative liberty

41
Q

Why does Berlin prefer negative liberty?

A

Because it ‘does, at least, recognise the fact that human goals are many, not all of them commensurable, and in perpetual rivalry with one another.’

42
Q

What does Berlin hold pluralism to be?

A

That there is a ‘plurality of values which men can and do seek, and that these values differ.’

43
Q

What is Charles Taylor’s reply to Berlin?

A

That criticisms of positive liberty ‘refuse to recognise the freedoms guaranteed in other societies as genuine’.