Liberation Theology and Marx Flashcards
What did Marx believe about the relationship between humanity and the material world?
He believed when humanity and the material world are in harmony, people feel useful in life. But society is rarely in harmony with the material world. Society often collapses and has to be rebuilt - this is historical materialism.
Marx wanted the collapse of Capitalism through a revolution.
According to Marx, how does Capitalism lead to the alienation, dehumanisation and exploitation of people?
- In order for Capitalism to work, goods must be produced; goods are at the centre and humans are alienated.
- Workers are part of a machine to produce for the bourgeoisie.
- Workers are alienated from the product because they cannot express creativity.
- The proletariat pay their wages back to the bourgeoisie through consumerism.
- The proletariat need to rise up against the bourgeoisie.
How does Marx use Praxis?
Praxis: a situation is analysed, injustice identified, the causes are worked out and action is taken to bring about change.
Marx believed we should aim for a Communist society through direct action.
What does Marx call religion and why?
“The opium of the people.”
God is an example of ‘false consciousness” - something that keeps the proletariat unaware of exploitation. Religion helps calm the working classes and gives them the delusion of an afterlife that makes them carry on.
How is Marx’s approach successful?
- More person-centred. We should centralise the idea of removing oppression.
- Marx helps reflect on society and aims to abolish the class system.
- It provides ‘joined-up thinking’. Different parts of society don’t run separately to each other.
How is Marx’s approach unsuccessful?
- Marx has a narrow view of society as there have been examples of harmonious societies under capitalism.
- Where Marxist ideology has been implemented, it has often collapsed.
- Even in communist societies, there remains injustice and inequality.
What is Liberation Theology?
It stems from the situation in Latin America, where government corruption oppresses the poor. It rejects the approach of Western theology where religion is a private matter. Religion and politics are inherently linked. Liberation Theology begins with the reality the poor are in rather than using theology to fix situations. It emphasises solidarity with the poor and action to make their lives better.
What idea is at the core of Liberation Theology’s approach?
Reversal.
Theology should begin with the aim to reverse the oppressive conditions of the poor. This is influenced by Marx, who believed capitalist structures could be reversed.
What is the Kingdom of God for Liberation theologians?
It is not at the end of time but the transformation of society here and now. Liberation Theology seeks to reverse alienation and oppression of the working class.
What type of sin does Liberation Theology emphasise and why?
Social sin. It affects people on a structural level and results in poverty, injustice and violence. It identifies entire systems that need to be overturned.
How does the historical materialist approach relate to Liberation Theology?
Reversal in Lib. Theology needs to be dramatic.
Some took this to extremes: Restrepo, a Catholic priest, joined a violent struggle against corrupt Colombian government.
Moderate approach: solidarity with the poor, and leaving theology to one side until the time is right. Approaching things ‘bottom up’ allows entire systems to be radically changed.
How does Gutiérrez, the founder of Liberation Theology, link Original Sin to structural and social oppression?
Gutiérrez drew links between Original Sin and structural or social sin by looking at the oppressive governments in Latin America and the capitalistic systems in place.
For a Christian to battle against Original Sin, they must rise up against structural sin. Once structural sin has been eliminated, Christians can move on to personal sin and restoring relationships with God.
How could one support the view that Liberation Theology has engaged fully enough with Marxism?
- By acknowledging Jesus as the one true teacher but that radical steps are required, Lib. Theology has pushed its relationship with Marxism to the limit. Any further and God would be deemed ‘false consciousness.’
- Lib. Theology has been useful in Latin America, showing that focus on praxis is successful.
- Any further engagement with Marxism might make Christianity lose its distinctiveness.
How could one argue that Liberation Theology has not engaged fully enough with Marxism?
- Lib. Theology has not had a global impact perhaps because Marxism hasn’t been used enough and Christianity still focuses on spiritual poverty over material poverty.
- There is still deep injustice in Latin America so there should be more focus on revolution.
- Lib. Theology is confined to Latin America and Marxism should be used to apply its principles in other contexts.
What is the ‘Preferential Option for the Poor’?
The idea that the needs of the poor must be prioritised at all times.