liberalism Flashcards
John Locke’s views on human nature
- humans: rational, guided by self-interest
- rationalism: innate quality for individuals - individuals develop best when left alone free to pursue their own happiness
- egotistical individualism: humans are naturally drawn to the advancement of selfish interests but as humans are rational this doesn’t lead to conflict to others
- e.g. social contract - governing must have consent of governed e.g. Fixed Term Parliament Act 2011
John Locke’s views on the state
- must be representative, based on consent of governed
- night-watchman role, justified by negative freedom
- state intervention only justified to prevent actions that are harmful to others - allows individuals to follow the good life
- state of nature: humans born in a state of equality and freedom with natural rights to life, liberty and property. ‘State of law’ resolves disputes more efficiently than under state of nature
- e.g. free market policies - deregulation & privatisation of electricity, water and railways by Thatcher
John Locke’s views on society
- society predates the state: ‘natural’ societies with natural laws and rights
- individuals self-seeking and independent but constrained by rational nature - they respect the rights of others so their own rights are respected in turn
- e.g. education policies prioritize access to quality education, promote critical thinking skills & encourage engagement - highlights role of education in cultivating an enlightened society e.g. Pupil Premium - funding to improve educational outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in state-funded schools
John Locke’s views on the economy
- state policy should respect ‘natural right’ to private property & arbitrate effectively between individuals competing for trade & resources
- state’s only role is to protect property & enforce contracts
- market should be left to guide rational individuals
- e.g. free market/trade - no subsidies, taxes or regulations - e.g. deregulation & privatisation of electricity, water and railways by Thatcher
Mary Wollstonecraft’s views on human nature
- rationalism defines both genders: the Enlightenment’s optimistic analysis of human nature should apply to all humans
- 18th century England, society & state implied women were not rational and thus denied them individual freedom & formal equality
- e.g. women not allowed land ownership or paid employment & sacrificed little individualism to become wives with little legal protection against domestic violence & no divorce laws
- e.g. Domestic Abuse Act 2021
Mary Wollstonecraft’s views on the state
- the monarchical state should be replaced by a republic which enshrines women’s rights
- formal equality must be accorded to all individuals - supported French Revolution’s emphasis upon ‘citizens’ and its indifference to gender differences
- e.g. Equality Act 2010 - requires employers to pay men and women equally & Affirmative Action - promote the representation of women in traditionally male-dominated fields e.g. politics, STEM and business
Mary Wollstonecraft’s views on society
`- society ‘infantilised’ women, thus stifling female individualism
- by fettering female individualism, England was limiting their stock intelligence, wisdom and morality
- “such arrangements are not conditions where reason and progress may prosper”
- e.g. political empowerment through gender quotas & all-women shortlists used by Labour and Lib Dems
Mary Wollstonecraft’s views on the economy
- a free market economy would be energised by the enterprise of liberated women
- aligned with Adam Smith’s laissez-faire economics
- e.g. Equality Act 2010 - requires employers to pay men and women equally & Affirmative Action - promote the representation of women in traditionally male-dominated fields e.g. politics, STEM and business
John Stuart Mill’s views on human nature
- human nature is not fixed - forever progressing to a higher level - liberty was not just a ‘natural right’ but the engine of ongoing human development
- focus on what individuals could become - known as ‘individuality’ or ‘developmental individualism’
- harm principle: state should tolerate all actions & opinions unless it harms the liberty of other individuals - ‘self-regarding :)’ vs ‘other regarding :(‘ actions
- negative freedom: freedom was the absence of restraint
- e.g. civil liberties protection such as freedom of speech, assembly and religion are all codified in the first amendment of the US Constitution
John Stuart Mill’s views on the state
- consensus via education: education provides the means through which the interests of society’s minorities can be reconciled
- the principle of ‘government by consent’ would be compromised if the interests of some liberal-minded individuals were denied by the votes of most uneducated voters - ‘tyranny of the majority’
- e.g. education reform - Pupil Premium - funding to improve educational outcomes for disadvantaged pupils in state-funded schools - role of education in cultivating an enlightened society
John Stuart Mill’s views on society
- the best society is one where ‘individuality’ coexists with tolerance and self-improvement
- individuals rely on societies that tolerate their individualism
- greater enlightenment will produce greater tolerance and consensus
- e.g. proportional representation in electoral systems e.g. STV provides greater, fair representation to minority viewpoints
John Stuart Mill’s views on the economy
- laissez-faire capitalism is vital to progress, individual enterprise & individual initiative
- property facilitated individualism - property is a crucial vehicle for self-realisation and self-determination
- unequal outcomes are consistent with a ‘meritocratic’ society that encourages individualism and rewards those who have earned their advantages
- e.g. free market/trade - no subsidies, taxes or regulations - e.g. deregulation & privatisation of electricity, water and railways by Thatcher
John Rawls’ views on human nature
- mankind is selfish yet empathetic, valuing both individual liberty & the plight of those around them
- veil of ignorance: if individuals did not know the sort of people they would be in a society (white/ethnic minority, rich/poor etc.) rational humans would choose a society where the poorest members fared better than in present society
- government by consent - individuals endorse this ‘fairer’ society
- e.g. Beveridge Report 1942 providing post-war welfare state through unemployment benefits, food assistance programs, housing support etc. “from cradle to grave”
John Rawls’ views on the state
- conditions of the poor should be improved by the state
- the gap between richest and poorest shouldn’t necessarily be narrowed
- enlarged, ‘enabling’ state: significant redistribution of wealth via extensive public spending & progressive taxation
- extended state so its activities liberate individuals from social and economic problems, enabling them to fulfil their potential
- representative democracy rather than direct democracy
- e.g. universal healthcare e.g. formation of the NHS in 1948 & Obama’s Affordable Healthcare Act 2010: stemmed from a belief that individual liberty can be obstructed by economic factors
John Rawls’ views on society
- the society most rational individuals would choose would be one where the condition of the poorest would improve
- veil of ignorance: if individuals did not know the sort of people they would be in a society (white/ethnic minority, rich/poor etc.) rational humans would choose a society where the poorest members fared better than in present society
- the original position: individuals construct a society they feel would be superior to their current one
- e.g. Beveridge Report 1942 providing post-war welfare state through unemployment benefits, food assistance programs, housing support etc. “from cradle to grave”
John Rawls’ views on the economy
- free-market capitalism should be tempered by the state’s obligation to advance its poorest citizens
- expansion of state spending to overcome the ‘five giants’ cited by the Beveridge Report needed to be financed by taxation
a sufficient yield could only be assured by the steady economic growth promised by Keynesianism - Keynesian capitalism: state directing & managing market forces to ensure steady growth, full employment & greater individual liberty
- e.g. progressive taxation: redistributing wealth and resources to provide equality of opportunity to benefit disadvantaged individuals
Betty Friedan’s views on human nature
- human nature has evolved in a way that discourages self-advancement among women
- concern for individualism: all individuals should seek self-determination and the realisation of their potential but gender is a serious hindrance to women
- e.g. paid family leave policies: allow both men and women to take time off work for newborns promotes gender equality in caregiving responsibilities - traditional gender roles often limit women’s opportunities
Betty Friedan’s views on the state
- state should legislate to prevent continued discrimination against female individualism
- disdained violence/illegality as a means of pursuing change & argued that significant progress was possible via the procedures of a liberal state
- state’s role in promoting tolerance should be extended further to illegalise racial and sexual discrimination
- this tolerant society could be ‘psychologically embedded’ by the state via bureaucratic agencies with an ‘educational’ function
- e.g. Human Rights Act 1998 & Equality Act 2010 - requires employers to pay men and women equally & prohibits gender discrimination, providing legal recourses for women, aligning with her advocacy for equality & fairness
Betty Friedan’s views on society
- society remains chauvinistic towards women but women are complicit in their repression
- it is illiberal attitudes in society rather than human nature that condemns women to under-achievement
- ‘cultural channels’: chauvinistic attitudes are nurtured & transmitted via society’s cultural channels (schools, religion, media, literature, theatre & cinema)
- these channels of ‘cultural conditioning’ leave many women convinced that their lot in life is determined by ‘iron laws’ rather than their own rationality & enterprise
- e.g. Equality Act 2010 - equality duties on schools (race, disability and gender) to eliminate discrimination and advance equality of opportunity shows importance of education in empowering women and challenging traditional gender roles
Betty Friedan’s views on the economy
- free market capitalism could be an ally of female emancipation if allied to legislation precluding sexual discrimination
- e.g. Equality Act 2010 - requires employers to pay men and women equally & Affirmative Action (‘positive discrimination’): e.g. all-women shortlists to promote the representation of women in traditionally male-dominated fields e.g. politics, STEM and business