liberalism Flashcards
hague conventions of 1899 and 1907
mitigating the limitations of the conductions of war, they came up with a few rules about the regulation of war, they can go to war but bind their behaviour bc it’s in the common interest of the states.
international law
grotius, bantham, gentili
economic ideas
adam smith, cobden
enlightenment
locke, kant
similarity w/ realism
anarchy is the default stage, states act rationally, westphalian state system
difference w/ realism
progress and change is possible
kantian triangle (3)
democracy, economic independence, international institutions
kantian triangle- democracy
the more democratic states you have the fewer conflicts, not all units are similar- political regimes matter
kantian triangle- economic independence
- medium communication: sustained commercial interactions limit conflict bc a better knowledge of needs and preferences, mutual understanding/identity, it’s not relative gains
- risks and costs: conflict endangers access to markets, imports and capital
kantian triangle- international institutions
the more int orgs the fewer states have an incentive to wage war, leaders are held responsible for costs and benefits, they promote peace and cooperation, coercing norm breakers
hanseatic league
first attempt at a pan european alliance, coordination of some commercial agreements, longest-running international cooperation effort
what was liberalism in the interwar period? (2)
conditions for domestic order to be produced at the international level, harmony of interests states can recognize they have common interests/values that can bind their decisions
14 point wilson- peace
peace is not automatic, its is the outcome of conscious efforts
what did interwar liberalism fail to anticipate (2)
- self-interest and sovereignty- joint interests are the interests of great powers, not everyone’s self-interest was considered, states will rationally follow their own.
- the limited consensus among states- when to sanction. certain behaviour, states didn’t respect rules- japanese invasion of manchuria
two developments in the post WW2 period
- realist challenge (carr, morgenthau, then waltz)
2. the development of international institutions and interdependence after WW2
what led to the development of liberal institutionalism?
development of international institutions after WW2 (according to Keohane)
liberal triumphalism post CW
- what is it?
- 2 scholars
drop in conflicts ,increase in global trade and the number of democracies (pinker and fukuyama)
liberal leviathan - ikenberry
the liberal international order differs from period international orders because the US undertook this endeavour for its national interest, but unlike previously, it accepted some significant restraints on its own actions through international institutions
Mearsheimer view on international institutions
they don’t mean that much- they are just a way for superpowers to make sure they stay at the top
democratic peace theory
has strong empirical regularity- democracies don’t go to war with each other. people started believing the theory- we should force countries to be democracies so we don’t have war (liberal interventionism- bush)
micheal doyle
recognized that liberal democracies are as aggressive as any other regime in relation to authoritarian regimes/stateless poeple
phases of liberalism- ikenberry
- idealist moment: interwar period and the failed attempt to replace old bop with rule of law
- the US set about constructing ot- embedding certain fundamental principles to the UN charter.
- American hegemony no longer appears to be an adequate framework to support a liberal international order- the world no longer wants a single hegemon
rtop - for and agsint
for- at the heart of rtop is the basic right of security
against- supports the imperialist impulse
according to liberalism how do io’s achieve peace? (4)
- identifying and coercing norm breakers
- forum for mediating, resolving disputes
- reducing uncertainty by providing info
- demonstrating mutual and long term gains of cooperation