Liabilities Flashcards
Arson-Danger to life
S267(1)(a) Crimes Act 1961
Intentionally or Recklessly,
Damages by fire or damages by means of explosive,
Any property,
Knowing or ought to know that danger to life is likely to ensue
Arson-No interest
S267(1)(B) Crimes Act 1961
Intentionally or Recklessly,
Without claim of right,
Damages by fire or damages by means of explosive,
Any immoveable property, vehicle, ship or aircraft,
In which that person has no interest
Arson-Benefit/Loss
S267 (1)(c) Crimes act 1961
Intentionally,
Damages by fire or damages by means of explosive,
Any immoveable property, vehicle, ship or aircraft,
With intent to obtain any benefit or cause loss to any other person
Arson-No interest
S267 (2)(a) Crimes Act 1961
Intentionally or recklessly,
Without claim of right ,
Damages by fire or damages by means of explosive ,
Any Property,
in which that person has no interest .
Arson- Benefit/Loss
S267 (2)(b) Crimes Act 1961
Intentionally or recklessly,
Damages by fire or damages by means of explosive,
any property,
with intent to obtain any benefit or cause loss to any person.
Intentional damage-10 years
S269(1) crimes act 1961
Intentionally or recklessly,
destroys or damages any property,
if he or she knows or ought to know that danger to life is likely to result
Intentional damage-No interest
S269(2)a) Crimes Act 1961
Intentionally or recklessly,
Without claim of right,
Damages or destroys ,
Any Property ,
In which the person has no interest
Intentional damage
S269(2)(b) Crimes Act 1961
Intentionally or recklessly,
Without claim of right,
Destroys or damages ,
Any Property ,
With intent to obtain any benefit or cause loss to any person
Attempted Arson
S268 Crimes Act 1961
10 Years
Attempt to commit arson and respect of any immovable Property or any vehicle ship or aircraft
Attempt
Intend to commit the fence and take a real and substantial step towards achieving that aim.
Caselaw -Rv Harpur
The defendants conduct may be considered in its entirety . Considering how much remains to be done is relevant but not determinative.
Providing explosives-2 Years
S272 CA1961
Caselaw-RvHallam
It must be proved that the offender knowingly had the substance in his possession and that he knew it to be an explosive substance