Definitions and Caselaw Flashcards
Intent
Deliberate act and intent to produce a specific result
Intent-caselaw
R v Collister
Intent may be inferred by :
-The offenders actions and words before during and after
-The surrounding circumstances
-The nature of the act
Recklessly
Conscious and deliberate taking of an unjustified risk
Reckless-caselaw
Cameron v R
The defendant knew the actions would bring about a proscribed result
the prescribed circumstances existed and having regard to that risk those actions were unreasonable .
RV tipple
A deliberate decision to run the risk
Without claim of right
A belief at the time of the act in proprietary or possessory right to the Property
Damages by fire
Burning or charing doesn’t have to be set alight. Melting blistering of paint or smoke damage will suffice.
Caselaw-Damage
R v Archer
Property may be damaged if it suffers permanent or temporary physical harm or permanent or temporary impairment of its value or use .
Explosive
Substance or mixture capable of decomposition at a rapid rate that results in an explosion . includes gunpowder dynamite ammunition
Property
Includes real or personal property any estate or interest in any real or personal property
Immovable Property
If it is currently fixed in place in unable to be moved. However can be made movable.
Vehicle
Equipped with wheels tracks or revolving runners which it moves on
Ship
Any description of a vessel used in navigation
Aircraft
Machine that derives support from the air
Knows or ought to know
Simester and Brookbanks -Correctly believing
Danger to life
Danger must be someone elses life and is human
Obtain
Obtain or retain for himself or another
Benefit
S269(4) -means any benefit, Pecuniary advantage, privilege, property, service or valuable consideration.
Cause loss
R v Morely -Loss is assessed by the extent of which the complainant’s position prior to theoffence has been diminished or impaired.
Person
Proven by judicial notice and circumstantial evidence.
Cause loss to organisation which is a person under wider definition.
What is needed by prosecution to prove providing explosives to commit a crime section 272 crimes act 1961?
RVHallam-it must be proof that the offender knowingly had the substance in his possession and also knew that substance to be an explosive.
Proving recklessness
- Defendant Consciously and deliberately ran a risk
- The risk was the one that was unreasonable to take in the circumstances as they were known to the defendant.