Lexical Development Flashcards

1
Q

Arbitrariness

A

Sound of a word has no systematic relationship to the meaning of a word
>exception is onomatopoeia (“meow”)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Context-bound words

A

-Used in only some contexts

>E.g. using word “car” ONLY for cars outside the window.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Prelexical words

A

Not truly referential

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nominals

A

Names for objects, nouns.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Decontextualization

A

Words used more flexibly and referentially.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Natural partitions hypothesis

A

Difference between nouns and verbs based on pre-existing perceptual-conceptual distinction between Concrete Concepts (persons, things) and Predicative Concepts (activity, change-of-state, casual relations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Relational relativity hypothesis

A
  • Meanings of nouns are more similar than the meanings of verbs across languages
  • Language-specific differences may make verbs harder to learn.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Underextensions

A

Children use a word in fewer contexts than should

> using “dog” to refer only to poodles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Overextensions

A

Children use a word in more contexts than they should/

> Using “dog” to refer to all four-legged mammals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Holistic

A

everything as a unit rather than a sum of its individual parts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Referential style

A
  • More social expressions

- Fewer referential nouns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Expressive syle

A
  • More social expressions

- Fewer referential nouns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Segmentation

A

[clear] beginnings and endings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Fast mapping

A

Initial mapping on the basis of only a few exposures

> Children show a familiar and an unfamiliar object. “Can I have the zib”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Whole-object assumption

A

When confronted with a new word for an object children assume word describes whole object, not a feature or a sub-part.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mutual Exclusivity Assumption

A

Not all words refer to whole objects.

Children assume that different words refer to different things

17
Q

Pragmatic principles

A

Child infers intent of speaker

18
Q

Principle of conventionality

A

Speakers of a common language use same words to express meaning

> e.g., when referring to someplace to sit at the dining table, we use the word “chair”

19
Q

Principle of contrast

A

Implication of principle of conventionality, so they use a different form to imply that the speaker is referring to DIFFERENT MEANING “dog” vs “pet”

20
Q

Syntactic bootstrapping

A

Using syntactic cues to aid learning words

21
Q

Extension

A

Extending word meanings to new examples.

> “This is a cup – what else is a cup?”

22
Q

Taxonomic assumption

A

Words refer to things of same kind.

> If learn word for a given “dog,” assume it applies to all things of the same kind, i.e., all “dogs”