Levine

Question 1

Aims?

Answer 1

1- if helping behaviour varies across situations
2- if helping behaviour varies across countries
3- what characteristics effect helping behaviour

Question 2

Method?

Answer 2

Quasi in a field environment. Conditions involved comparing groups of people living in each city. Correlational analyse investigated the relationships between helping and various community variables

Question 3

Participants?

Answer 3

23 cities. Volunteer. 1198 participants. Children, elders and not capable of helping were excluded

Question 4

Researcher?

Answer 4

Male and didn’t speak to anyone. College age and beat you dressed. Trained

Question 5

3 situations

Answer 5

Dropped pen
Hurt leg, limo and a leg brace dropped magazines
Blind person crossing road- wore dark glasses a snd had a white cane

Question 6

Community variables

Answer 6

Population size, PPP, cultural values- collectivist and individually ice and simpatia, pace of life

Question 7

Most likely to help city?

Answer 7

Rio de Janeiro 100, 80, 100

Simpatia country

Question 8

New York?

Answer 8

Individualistic. 31, 28, 75

Question 9

Eh of simpatia countries

Answer 9

Brazil, Mexico and Spain

Question 10

Ppp

Answer 10

-.43 more well off they are, less likely to help

Question 11

Strengths of method?

Answer 11

High ecological validity, participants unaware of study, sample side was large, quantitatdata for comparison

Question 12

Limitations of the method

Answer 12

Correlational analysis meaning cause and effect cannot be established.
Validity some people might of notuced what was happening
Deception