Lesson 9 - Duck's phase model of relationship breakdown Flashcards
when does relationship breakdown occur
- relationship breakdown occurs when one or both people in the relationship feel that it is not working, so wish to end the relationship
phases in Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown
- intrapsychic processes
- dyadic processes
- social processes
- grave dressing processes
intrapsychic processes - phases in Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown
- characterised by the dissatisfied person privately thinking about their relationships + brooding about problems
- focus on partner’s faults + “they’re under-benefitting”
- might feel very depressed + withdraw from social interactions
- don’t say anything to their partner at this stage
dyadic processes - phases in Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown
- involves a private confrontation/ discussion whereby partners communicate w/ each other about their problems
- may think carefully about investments they have in their relationship e.g. house, children etc..
- could be reconciliation if the other partner accepts validity of dissatisfied partner’s views
= promises to change behaviour or agree to sort out issues - marital therapy might be useful at this point
social processes - phases in Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown
- break up is made public to friends + family
- advice + support are give from people outside the relationship, alliances formed
- involves criticising former partner + scapegoating
- young couples experience breakdowns more frequently
= testing the market to find ideal partner - older couples experience breakdowns less frequently
grave dressing processes - phases in Duck’s phase model of relationship breakdown
- as relationship dies + breaks down
= need to mourn + justify our actions - ex partners begin their post relationship lives + begin to publicise accounts of how the relationship broke down
= social credit remains high - different versions of the relationship are given to different people
- partners may reinterpret their point of view of their ex partner
ads of Duck’s model
- fifth stage
- social exchange theory
disads of Duck’s model
- breaking up or broken up with
- gender differences
- ethical issues
- reductionist
fifth stage - ads of Duck’s model
- improvements have been made to the model as time has passed (since 1982 when model was devised)
- psych found that the role that people had in deciding if the relationship should breakdown
= most important prediction of the breakdown experience - Duck teamed up with a psych + introduced a fifth phase = THE RESURRECTION STAGE
= person engages in personal growth
= gets prepared for new romantic relationships
social exchange theory - ads of Duck’s model
- support for Duck’s model model comes from the social exchange theory by Kelley
- states that if a relationship has high costs + minimal rewards = relationship isn’t worth continuing = breakdown + end
breaking up or broken up with - disads of Duck’s model
- psych criticised Duck’s model
- most important factor = found that the role that people had in deciding if the relationship should breakdown
- found that those who didn’t initiate the end of the relationship = most miserable, lonely + depressed + angry in the weeks after the relationship ended
- those who initiate the breakdown were the least stressed + least upset BUT did feel guilty
gender differences - disads of Duck’s model
- Duck’s model ignores gender differences that exist when analysing the breakdown of relationships
- found research evidence to suggest that females emphasise unhappiness, lack of emotional support = reasons for breakdown
- males = lack of sex/ fun
- females often wish to stay friends w/ an ex-partner
- males would rather have a clean break + not stay friends
ethical issues - disads of Duck’s model
- relationship breakdown is a socially sensitive topic
- e.g. psychological harm may be an issue when people are recalling why their relationship broke down = the impact of this
- invasion of privacy is also an issue that Duck would have to address when investigating relationship breakdown
reductionist - disads of Duck’s model
- model could be viewed as reductionist + not very accurate
- reducing the complex phenomenon of relationship breakdown into 4 simple stages that must follow a specific order
- in the real world it would seem unlikely that relationship breakdown can be reduced to these 4 stage
- very unpredictable + doesn’t happen in this chronological order
= e.g. some couples break up, make up, break up etc..
research by Duck into relationship breakdown
Duck identifies several factors that can lead to an unhappy marriage + lead to divorce/ breakdown:
- partners that marry when they are very young
- partners that become parents (when they’re very young)
= often have little time to adjust to their new responsibilities
= can cause financial + housing problems - couples that are from different socioeconomic backgrounds
- partners that have different social demographic backgrounds e.g. race, religion etc..
- people who have parents that are divorced
- people who have had many sexual partners before they were married