lesson 9 Flashcards

1
Q

consideration

A

the inducement, price, or promise that causes a person to enter into a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

contracts are a two way street. if one person gets everything, and the other gets nothing:

A

there is no consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

two basic elements of consideration

A
  • value: must be a legal benefit to each side
  • bargained for exchange: each party must have done something to benefit the other and that exchange must have been bargained/negotiated
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

exchange must induce ______, which must induce the _______.

A

detriment, promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Joe tells Mike he will buy him pizza. Mike accepts, and is later rude to Joe. Joe changes his mind and Mike claims a contract. Ruling?

A

There is no contract because Mike gave no consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

value

A

an act, a forbearance, or a promise to act/forbear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

an act

A

when a party does something he was not legally required to do. must be voluntary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

forbearance

A

opposite of an act, decision to not do something

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

example of an act that does not count

A

student tells professor he will not cheat on a test if she gives him 100 dollars. he already has the duty not to cheat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

promises to act/promises of forbearance

A

constitute value when analyzing consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

adequacy of consideration

A

the courts will NOT analyze this. people are allowed to make bad deals.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

if purported consideration is outrageously high/unreasonable (elon musk example):

A

courts do not consider the adequacy of minimal consideration, and will not decline to enforce situations of outrageous or unreasonable consideration (musk must pay)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

common situations that do not constitute consideration

A

illusory promises, preexisting duty, past consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

illusory promises

A

appear to be a promise, but really isn’t, and does not constitute consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

illusory promise example

A

Jason tells heather he will sell her his old textbook for $10. Heather says she will check if its the right book, then buy it. Next day, Heather gives him $10, but Jason says he already sold it. Heather sues him for cost, but she did not actually promise because it was CONDITIONAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

major exception to illusory promise

A

output contracts and requirement contracts

17
Q

output contracts and requirement contracts

A

these contracts do not specifically set an amount of goods to be sold or purchased and it gives the purchaser and seller certain benefits (valid consideration under UCC)

18
Q

example of output/requirement contracts

A

restaurant makes a deal to purchase “all the wine they need” from vineyard. Vineyard promises to supply it. Under UCC this is not an illusory promise, the promise is valid bc of a requirements contract. There is a way to determine how much they would need.

19
Q

preexisting duty

A

when duty to act already exists, person cannot use their compliance with that duty to constitute consideration in another matter

20
Q

preexisting duty example

A

alaska packers association v domenico (1902): workers agreed to perform a job for a certain period for a certain amount ($50 and 2 cents/fish). Workers wanted more money, packers agreed. Workers ended up being paid the old amount. Packers said we did make the promise, but did not have that intention. Courts did not enforce the additional money b/c they had no consideration due to preexisting duty.

21
Q

exceptions to preexisting duty

A

additional work, modification, unforeseen circumstances,

22
Q

additional work

A

additional work that is performed above and beyond the original contract does constitute consideration on the part of the workers to seek additional compensation

23
Q

modification

A

under common law additional consideration is necessary for modification of a contract. sometimes, UCC creates an exception for modification

24
Q

unforeseen circumstances example

A

James hires Kevin to plow a field. Kevin starts plowing and determines that the field is a former war zone and there are land mines buried. The fees to deactivate them are expensive and make the original contract a losing proposition. If Kevin agrees to finish the contract anyway, the costs of hiring the other company are valid consideration, even though Kevin has a preexisting duty to finish the job.

25
past consideration
cannot be considered consideration because it has already been performed
26
past consideration example
david gets an A, parents said they would pay for ski trip. later they decide to wait until the summer, so no trip. David sued his parents, court would hold that david provided no consideration. achieving an A had already occurred.
27
exceptions to past consideration
- when parties agree in advance: if they agree in advance that past consideration can be consideration for a new contract, it's "new" - promissory estoppel: entity claiming no consideration is "estopped" or prevented from avoiding the promise due to a claim of no consideration, usually when other party relies on the promise
28
example of promissory estoppel exception to past consideration
two years before Jan retires, company promises to pay her for the rest of her life when she retires. Jan retires, but a few years later the company is taken over, new management stops the checks and claims that jan had not given consideration and that her good work was past consideration that did not count. since jan had relied on the promise, some courts will apply promissory estoppel