Lesson 8: Inference Based Qs Flashcards
Inference definition
a conclusion; something that can be concluded from a premise
Asses the facts (inference)
Asses the facts
DO NOT ID conclusion or evidence
label strong/weak language
cut the argument (between different POVs, topics, points in time)
Do not try to predict the answer choices
Step 1 `(inference)
Infer from the argument that the AC is true or false
the question stem will ask you to infer something that is
- must be true
- must be false
- could be true
- could be false
Must be true (key words)
Inference
inferred from the argument
inference supported by the argument
the passage supports, suggests, indicates
properly drawn or follows logically
** most common type of inference question
Must be false (key words)
inference
inconsistent or incompatible
must be false/cannot be true
could be true (key words)
inference
consistent/compatible
could be true
could be false (key words)
inference
could be false
Step 2:
inference
asses the facts (DO NOT ID conclusion or evidence)
label strong/weak language
cut the argument
do not predict the correct AC
Step 3:
Must be true (ACs)
the correct AC mentions a fact that is true based on the info in the argument
eliminate any AC that could be false
Step 3: (inference)
Could be true (ACs)
the correct AC mentions something that could be true based on the info in the argument
eliminate ACs that must be false
Step 3: (inference)
Must be false (ACs)
the correct AC mentions something that is 100% false based on the info in the argument
eliminate any AC that could be true
Step 3: (inference)
Could be false (ACs)
the correct AC mentions something that may not be true based on the info in the argument
eliminate any AC that must be true
Point at issue
step 1:
the question stem will tell you that there is either an agreement or disagreement between the two speakers
point at issue (key words)
point at issue
agree/disagree
committed to a disagreement
Point at issue
step 2:
evaluate one speaker at a time
read only the first speakers argument and then employ argument analysis:
- do not id conclusion and evidence
- label strong/weak language
- cut the argument
- go to the ACs before reading the second speaker