Lesson 8 Flashcards
1.1 describe what a nudge is and their role
Any aspect of choice architecture that alters people’s behaviour in a predictable way without forbidding, penalizing or rewarding any of the options for behaviour.
To count as a nudge the intervention must be easy and cheap (opt in vs opt out policies)
1.2 List 4 dimensions that can be used to classify nudge characteristics
1) Boosting Self control vs activating a desired behaviour
2) Externally imposed vs self imposed
3) Mindful vs Mindless
4) Encouraging vs discouraging
1.2 In the context of a dimension used to classify nudge characteristics explain: Boosting Self control vs activating a desired behaviour
With certain behaviours, such as saving money or exercising, there is a discrepancy vs intent and action. Nudges that boost self control help correct this.
In other cases nudges to activate a desired behaviour are more useful if we are not actively considering the desired behaviour or are unsure what it is. (e.g. recycling bins with pictures of what is recyclable)
1.2 In the context of a dimension used to classify nudge characteristics explain: Externally imposed vs self imposed
Self imposed nudges are voluntarily adopted
Externally imposed nudges don’t require us to seek them out. They present available options in a way that passively shapes behaviour
1.2 In the context of a dimension used to classify nudge characteristics explain: Mindful vs Mindless
Considers whether the nudge will guide us to take a more deliberate cognitive approach to decision making or towards a more automatic implicit approach.
Mindful nudges guide us to a controlled state and help us follow through on a behaviour.
Mindless nudges include the use of emotion, framing or anchoring to sway the decisions we make
1.2 In the context of a dimension used to classify nudge characteristics explain: Encouraging vs Discouraging
Encouraging nudges facilitate a particular behaviour.
Discouraging nudges hinder or prevent a behaviour believed to be undesirable.
1.3 Explain the significance of mapping the decision context in designing an effective nudging strategy (4 points)
Mapping or auditing the decision making process is the first step for designing a nudging strategy.
This is followed by identifying the key heuristics and influences.
This helps identify factors that prevent us from following through on our intentions.
These bottlenecks represent areas where a nudging srategy might yield quick results.
1.4 Outline aspects of the end user’s decision making process to address in a context audit (4)
1) The properties of the decision including incentives, motivations, the attention it receives, how choices are presented, and the default option
2) Information sources and how information related to the decision is gathered and presented.
3) Features of the individual’s mindset and whether emotions influence the outcome of the decision
4) Environmental and social factors such as peer pressure and lengthy application processes
1.5 Outline factors to consider when prioritizing nudge selection to address bottlenecks in the decision making process (5)
1) Operational costs associated with implementation
2) What bottleneck the nudge addresses (prioritize those that are further upstream in the process first)
3) Relative reach - self imposed nudges such as pre-commitment may not reach as many people as defaults or automatic enrollment
4) Interventions like automatic enrollment have a high adoption rate but lead to everyone accepting the same terms and benefits. Look at different segments of the target audience that may have different behavioural preferences
5) Long term effectiveness
1.6 Explain the role of process and evaluation of options in testing the effectiveness of nudges
An outcome evaluation is important to determining whether or not a nudge should be continued or if a different one should be implemented
2.1 Explain the concept of choice architecture
The way a choice is presented influences what the decision maker does.
Choice can be influenced in many ways including
- order of choice presentation
- framing
- order of attributes
- ease of use
- selection of defaults
In reality there is no neutral architecture - any way the choice is presented influences the decision made.
2.2 describe two categories of tools available to choice architects
1) Tools used in structuring or setting up the choice task,
such as the optimal number of options or using a technology to assist in the choice task
2) Tools available for describing choice options,
(how to present to decision makers) such as partitioning options into groups or categories
2.3 What two considerations does a choice architect need to balance in terms of the number of options offered
1) More options increases the chance of offering a preference match to the decision maker
2) More options places a greater cognitive burden on the decision maker
2.3 what are some factors that can affect the balance between the number of choice options a choice architect gives or rule of thumb guidelines (4)
1) characteristics of the decision maker
2) One wants the fewest number of options that will encourage a reasoned consideration between them
3) One wants an adequate number of options to avoid generating context specific preferences (where the presence or absence of an option influences what is chosen)
4-5 options is generally a good starting point, One could start with a limited choice set and then provide more options as desired
2.4 Explain how using technology based decision aids while structuring the choice task can be both beneficial and detrimental (3+1)
Beneficial:
- help identify alternatives
- interactive decision making aids can be used to compare choice alternatives in terms of attractiveness in various dimensions
- can be designed to steer decision makers to a particular decision
Detrimental:
- can be designed to steer decision makers to a particular decision
2.5 Explain the role of defaults in structuring the choice task
Option an individual gets if they don’t actively decide.
Powerful too for choice architect as most users choose the default
2.6 List 4 kinds of default policies
1) Simple default - one for everyone
2) Random Defaults
3) Forced Choice - withholding the product or service is the default and releasing it to the recipient only after a choice is made
4) Sensory defaults - change according to what can be inferred about the user - change the language based on country for example
2.5 List 3 default setting options for products and services that are frequently chosen
1) Persistent defaults - past choices are remembered
2) Reverting defaults - the last changes made to the default configuration are forgotten
3) Predictive defaults - intelligently alter reuse defaults based on observation of the user
2.6 Outline ethical issues associated with the use of defaults and policy to address these issues (4 points)
Acceptability of using a default to guide choice has much to do with the reason the default is having an effect.
When decision makers are aware defaults are being used they exhibit a degree of metacognition showing they successfully retain autonomy and freedom of choice.
However if defaults are in effect because decision makers aren’t aware they have choices or because the transaction cost to change the default is too high the defaults impinge upon liberty.
An often prudent policy is to set the default to the option most people prefer when making an active choice.
2.6 Outline ethical issues associated with the use of defaults and policy to address these issues (4 points)
Acceptability of using a default to guide choice has much to do with the reason the default is having an effect.
When decision makers are aware defaults are being used they exhibit a degree of metacognition showing they successfully retain autonomy and freedom of choice.
However if defaults are in effect because decision makers aren’t aware they have choices or because the transaction cost to change the default is too high the defaults impinge upon liberty.
An often prudent policy is to set the default to the option most people prefer when making an active choice.
2.7 Many choices that we face involve outcomes that unfold over long periods of time. List 3 ways that this impacts decision making behaviour (Intertemporal biases)
1) We tend to be myopic - we prefer positive outcomes early and heavily discount future options
2) Uncertainty about the future can cause our preferences for future outcomes to be unclear such that certain types of outcomes are systematically over or under weighted. We can fail to consider satisfactory but second best options
3) We are often overly optimistic about the future and overestimate the probability that desired outcomes will occur as planned.
2.8 Outline two tools that a choice architect has to address intertemporal biases
1) Order of consideration - drawing attention to the delayed options can refocus a decision maker towards satisficing by considering second best options in light of cost and constraints involved.
2) Placing limited windows of opportunity - can overcome the tendency to think that the future holds more resources
Tools that translate aspects of the choice into immediate salient outcomes are generally more successful
2.9 Explain how structuring the choice task as a single choice vs a series of choices affects the decision maker’s search process
the strategies that people use to make complex decisions differ than those that only involve one decision.
Decision makers first screen choices based on a subset of attributes and then go back and look at the remaining alternatives.
Long or complex processes can be reduced with decision staging. This involves deciding what information to focus on as well as choices between attributes and alternatives. Breaking down a decision into multiples stages may make the process easier. Choice architects can also work with an understanding of sequential decision making by facilitating certain comparisons at different stages of the choice process.
2.10 Explain what the tendency towards even allocation is (define + 3 examples)
When we allocate resources over a fixed set of possibilities we are typically biased toward even allocation over each group or category that has been identified. For example
1) Personal investment, we tend towards allocating 1/n of our savings to each of the options that are singled out in retirement plans
2) In consumer choice we tend to seek variety when choosing multiple goods for future consumption
3) In decision analysis we are biased towards assigning equal probabilities to each event that could occur and equal importance weights towards each attribute that is explicitly identified