lesson 7 stuff Flashcards
how many books in the NT are related to the apostle Paul?
13 out of 27
what did Paul think of Christianity at first?
at the outset he was violently and actively hostile to the spreading Christian church
For Paul, the faith in Jesus was reserved for whom?
it was a faith for all persons, Jews and Gentiles alike
–> rooted in the belief that Jesus had died and been raised for the salvation of the world, not just of Israel
the difference between the difficulties of reconstructing the life and teachings of the historical Paul and reconstructing the life and teachings of the historical Jesus
Jesus left us no writings, whereas Paul did
The Problem of Pauline Pseudepigrapha
scholars have good reasons for thinking that some of Paul’s writings were not written by Paul
–> this comes as no shock to historians
Writings under a false name
pseudepigrapha
All of the writings not written by Paul under Paul’s name
- the three Pastoral epistles
2. the three epistles of Ephesians, Colossians, and 2 Thessalonians
Deutero-Pauline
the three epistles of Ephesians, Colossians, and 2 Thessalonians thought to have been written by a second Paul
the seven letters that virtually all scholars agree were written by Paul himself
Romans
1 and 2 Corinthians
Galatians
Philippians
1 Thessalonians
Philemon
For a historically accurate account of what Paul said and did, can we rely on Luke’s narrative in the book of acts?
in the book of Acts, Paul’s words and deeds have been modified in accordance with Luke’s own perspective
–> Just like he did with his Gospel
–> Acts can tell us a great deal about how Luke understood Paul, but less about what Paul himself actually said and did
how similar is the book of Acts to Paul’s letters?
In virtually every instance in which the book of Acts can be compared with Paul’s letters in terms of biographical detail, differences emerge
–> Sometimes these differences involve minor disagreements concerning where Paul was at a certain time and with whom
—-> ex: Did he leave Timothy and Yllas or did they go with Paul to Athens with him?
–> Other differences are of greater importance
—-> ex: Did he he go to Jerusalem and meet with the apostles or was the message received directly from Jesus?
–> Did Paul actually never break the jewish law or did he not give a damn?
true or false
Paul’s teachings in Acts are the same as in his own letters
false
Paul’s teachings in Acts differ in significant ways from what he says in his own letters
difference between pagan knowledge of the one true God in acts and Paul’s letters
Acts: Pagan had no way of knowing about the one true God so its chill if they didn’t practice Judaism
Letters: Pagans should have know since the beginning of the one true God
the most important insight into the Pauline epistles in modern scholarship
that all of them are “occasional”
–> hey are actual communications to particular individuals and communities, sent through the ancient equivalent of the mail
why did Paul write his epistles?
Paul wrote these letters to address problems that arose in the Christian communities he established
Paul visualized his past in his letter in which three stages?
his life as a Pharisee prior to faith in Christ
his conversion experience itself,
his activities as an apostle afterwards
Paul the Pharisee
before converting, he was a Jew born to Jewish parents and that he was zealous for the Law, adhering strictly to the traditions endorsed by the Pharisees
he clearly did study the Jewish Scriptures extensively
he was so loyal, that he even persecuting Christians at some stage
the only writings to survive from the pen of a Pharisee
Paul’s letters
Were pharisees jewish apocalypticists?
yeee
they believed in reviving the dead
in one set of view, Paul tried to follow the Jewish laws so mush to the letter that it was too much for him
–> Paul saw the light when he realized that the solution to his guilt was not to intensify his efforts but to find forgive-ness of his sins in Christ, who died to set him free from the Law
–> Paul, in this view, converted from a religion of guilt to a religion of love, and so became Jesus’ faithful follower
what is wrong with thinking that this is what made Paul convert?
Prior to his faith in Christ, he considered himself to be blameless before the Law
–> this popular view of Paul derives more from a kind of implicit anti-Semitism—the Jews are burdened with an impossible Law and don’t do a good job in keeping it—than from Paul himself
The first thing to observe about Paul’s conversion
he traces it back to an encounter with the resurrected Jesus
–> he names himself as the last person to have seen Jesus raised from the dead and marks this as the beginning of his change from persecutor to apostle
two related matters that would show how Paul interpreted seeing Jesus resurrected
aspects of Paul’s worldview that would have been confirmed by an encounter with a man raised from the dead
aspects that would have been reformulated in light of the experience