Lesson 5: Eysenck's Theory of the Criminal Personality Flashcards
Eysenck (1947)
Personality traits are biological in origin and came about through the type of nervous system that we inherit from our parents. So, all personality types are innately biological
Personality composition of offenders
High in neuroticism, extraversion, psychoticism
Extraversion
People will high extraversion are impulsive and seek sensations which may draw them to the thrill of committing crime
Neuroticism
They are unstable and unpredictable and Eysenck believes that people with a high neurotic score inherited a nervous system that made them difficult to condition. Therefore they will not learn easily from their mistakes
Psychoticism
Cold, lack empathy and prone to aggression which may translate to criminal behaviour
Strengths of Eysenck’s Theory
NO STRENGTHS!!
Weaknesses of Eysenck’s Theory
- Farrington et al (1982) reviewed several studies and reported that offenders score high on psychotics, but not on extraversion and neuroticism when compared to non-offenders. Therefore they may be cold, not empathetic and prone to aggression, but they are not impulsive or unstable.
- Too simplistic. Crime is too complex and varied to be due to a single personality type. For example, the personalty composition of a fraudster may be different from an arsonist or murderer
- Eysenck’s Theory is out of step with modern theories of criminal personality. Digman’s (1990) Five Factor Model introduces an openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness in addition to extraversion and neuroticism.
- Eysenck’s Theory is based on the idea that it is possible to measure personality through tests. It can be argued that personality is not as reducible to a score in this way. A person’s character may change on a daily basis as a response to daily struggles or otherwise.