Lesson 4 Fallacies Flashcards

1
Q

Fallacies

A

are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument. Fallacies can be either illegitimate arguments or irrelevant points, and are often identified because they lack evidence that supports their claim. Avoid these common fallacies in your own arguments and watch for them in the arguments of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Group think

A

occurs when a reader is encouraged to make a decision on an issue based on identification with a popular, high-status group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Flattery

A

can be used as a fallacy when a writer or speaker claims that people with certain positive traits will naturally agree with the claims being made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Bandwagon

A

Suggests you should do something because everyone else does.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Argument from Outrage

A

Occurs when a speaker or writer attempts to convince people by making them angry rather than by giving them a relevant argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

False authority

A

A celebrity is quoted or hired to support a product or idea in efforts to sway others opinions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Poisoning the well

A

Negative information is shared about an adversary so others will later discredit his or her opinions.
If negative information is shared about a person or group in hopes that it will discredit them later, that is called poisoning the well, and typically the information in question has little to do with whatever issues are at hand!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Scapegoating

A

is a hostile tactic often employed to characterize an entire group of individuals according to the unethical or immoral conduct of a small number of individuals belonging to that group.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Guilt by association

A

An adversary’s credibility is attacked because the person has friends or relatives who possibly lack credibility.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Ad hominem

A

Attacking the person instead of the argument. For example, “You say I shouldn’t drink so much, but you drink every day.” The validity of the argument (drink less) can’t be based on the behavior of the person making the argument. Instead, the validity of the argument should be evaluated on its own terms—separate from the person making the claim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Begging the question

A

occurs when one restates the point in different words in order to support the point.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Red Herring

A

is a logical fallacy in which irrelevant information is presented alongside relevant information, distracting attention from that relevant information. This may be done intentionally or unintentionally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

False Analogy

A

a comparison is made between two things without enough evidence to support that comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Either/Or

A

Making you think there are only two choices when really there are many.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Self-contradiction

A

one part of the writer’s argument directly contradicts the overall argument.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Non Sequitur

A

take two unrelated ideas and place them together in order to imply a cause/effect relationship

17
Q

Hasty Generalization

A

Drawing a broad conclusion based on a small minority. For instance, if you
witnessed a car accident between two women drivers, it would be a hasty generalization to conclude that all
women are bad drivers.

18
Q

Post Hoc

A

Also called false cause and effect; the writer argues that A caused B because B happened after A.

19
Q

Straw man

A

The writer rebuts a competing claim by offering an exaggerated or oversimplified version of it.
The writers rebuts a competing claim by offering an exaggerated or oversimplified version of it.

20
Q

Slippery slope

A

The writer suggests that taking a single action will lead to a sequence of negative consequences.

21
Q

Stereotyping

A

The writer uses a sweeping, general statement about a group of people in order to prove a point.

22
Q

Scare tactics

A

involve the use of frightening ideas to sway opinion.

23
Q

Inflation of Conflict

A

Using a conflict between two authorities as a reason to dismiss their arguments and knowledge.

24
Q

Appeal to Anonymous Authority

A

Using appeals to nonspecific groups.

25
Q

Appeal to Authority

A

Claiming to be an expert and, on that basis, to be deserving of trust. It’s important to remember that there are different kinds and levels of expertise: My weekend cooking class doesn’t make me an authority on recipes, though I can honestly say I’ve studied cooking. So, I might be an authority on some elements of cooking, but not all of cooking. When faced with an argument from authority, it is important to investigate the credentials of the speaker or writer.

26
Q

Argument from Authority

A

sing a statement taken out of context as authoritative support.

27
Q

Appeal to Nature

A

Suggesting a certain behavior or action is normal/right because it is “natural.”

28
Q

Argument from Ignorance

A

Assuming something is true because it has not been proven false.

29
Q

Cum Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc (With This, Therefore Because of This)

A

Confusing correlation with
causation—that is, thinking that because two things happened simultaneously, then one must have caused
the other. For example, “There has been an increase in both immigration and unemployment; therefore,
immigrants are taking away American jobs.” This statement is fallacious because there is no evidence to
suggest that immigration and unemployment are related to each other—other than that their rates increased
simultaneously.

30
Q

Argument by Dismissal

A

Rejecting an idea without providing a reason or explanation for its dismissal

31
Q

Argument by Emotive Language

A

Using emotional words that are not supported by evidence and/or are unconnected to the argument being made.

32
Q

Appeal to Pity

A

Drawing on irrelevant personal experiences or feelings in order to produce a sympathetic response.