Lesson 4-Common Law Duties and Liabilities to Clients and Third Parties Flashcards

1
Q

What are the four elements that need to be proved to win a breach of contract claim?

A
  1. Existence of an enforceable contract
  2. Plaintiff client complied with contractual obligations
  3. Defendant accountant breached the contract
  4. Damages were caused by the breach.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the burden of proof in a breach of contract case?

A

preponderance of the evidence” standard, more likely true than not true (>50%).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can a defendant recover punitive damages in a breach of contract case?

A

No, only compensatory damages are recoverable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Statute of Limitations for a Breach of contract case?

A

Oral contract: two years from breach; or

Written contract: four years from breach.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are 4 things that could justify a Breach of Contract?

A
  1. Client refuses to provide accountant with the documents necessary to complete the tax return.
  2. Client provides accountant with incomplete, inaccurate, or misleading information.
  3. Client informs accountant that it will not pay her bill as promised.
  4. Client’s CFO was incompetent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is breach of an oral contract actionable? Can obligations in a contract be implied?

A

Yes

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

In order to win a negligence malpractice case, a plaintiff must prove the following four elements by a preponderance of the evidence:

A
  1. Defendant accountant owed a duty of care to the client plaintiff
  2. Defendant breached the standard of care.
  3. The breach proximately causes an injury
  4. Plaintiff client suffers damages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What are two defenses to a Negligence Claim?

A

Statute of limitations-The SOL is 2 years from when the plaintiff knew or should have known of the right to sue.

Comparative negligence-If the plaintiff was also careless and that carelessness contributed causally to the loss, (recovery is barred if plaintiff’s carelessness exceeds 50%).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is scienter in a fraud case?

A

The defendant accountant knew or recklessly disregarded the falsity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is constructive fraud?

A

Reckless disregard or gross negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the statute of limitation for fraud cases?

A

4 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are the three approaches to negligence claims by 3rd parties?

A

Ultramares- Known user
Restatement of torts- Forseen
Rosenblum-Forseable user

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What approach to negligence claims by 3rd parties is most common?

A

Restatement of torts- Forseen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In order to prove liability under The securities act of 1933 plaintiffs need to prove?

A
  • Material misstatements or omissions in a securities offering registration statement
  • a loss occurred
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is a CPA’s defense to the Securities act of 1933?

A

Due diligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

In order to prove liability under The securities act of 1934 plaintiffs need to prove?

A
  • Material misstatements or omissions in a securities offering registration statement
  • a loss occurred
  • Causation due to misstatment
  • Scienter
  • Reliance