Lesson 3.2 Flashcards
what do we assume managers goal is?
to maximize value for shareholders
define principal agent issues
when managers (agents) make decisions that affect the wealth of shareholders (principals)
what is another way to explain principal agent issues
Managers may face situations where personal utility function conflicts with that of being an agent of the firm
when do we not worry about principal agent issues
When interests of principal and agent are identical
one form of uncertainty in principal agent issue
One form of uncertainty occurs because outcomes of agents actions are not linked in a totally deterministic way with their effort. Knowledge of results does not necessarily imply anything about effort. This is caused by info asymmetry
2 asymmetrical info issues
hidden action or moral hazard
most common hidden action issue
determining effort of agents
explain effort value to principal and agent
Effort has a disutility to agent but has a value to the principal because it increases probability of a favorable outcome
6 goals that may prevent managers from always taking actions to maximize firm value
1) minimizing effort
2) maximizing job security
3) avoiding failure
4) enhancing reputation and employment opportunities
5) consuming perquisites
6) pay
explain manager goal - minimizing effort
There is disutility to work given the opportunity cost of leisure
explain manager goal - maximizing job security
Managers may be disinclined to make risky choice that could jeopardize employment but risky projects are characterized by high potential reward or large potential loss
explain manager goal - avoiding failure
If risky project is undertaken, managers are rewarded if results are favourable and penalized if results are unfavourable
explain manager goal - enhancing reputation and employment opportunities
Sometimes reputation is promoted by doing things that benefit shareholders however this is not always the case. He may lower prices or give another firm that might be a potential employer a good deal.
explain manager goal - consuming perquisites
Luxury travel, expensive art in office, etc
explain manager goal - pay
Level and structure of compensation package becomes important parts of principal-agent story
what does level of output depend on?
Level of output depends on quality and quantity of effort provided by agent
why can effort not be directly rewarded?
Effort cannot be perfectly monitored by the principal and therefore cannot be directly rewarded
what happens because effort cannot be perfectly monitored?
Since the principal cannot observe and therefore cannot reward effort, the agent tends to shirk or reduce effort which in turn reduces output for principal
explain what effort mean
Achieving a target level of profit requires that managers incur some personal cost, which we call effort.
cost to manager of effort
value of time
profit formula when S is flat salary
profit(e) = R(e) - (S+C)
what does S mean
managerial compensation
what does C mean
other costs
when S is flat salary - profit(e) graph
upward curve with decreasing slope
objective of manager explain in terms of employment
maximize net benefit of employment
what is u(e)
the cost to the manager of supplying effort (disutility of effort),
flat salary - u(e) graph and why
upward curve with linear slope (slopes upward since more effort means more opportunity cost/cost/disutility)
define disutility of effort
a measure of the cost to the manager of supplying effort
flat salary - B(e) formula
S - u(e)
what is B(e)
is the net benefit to the manager of working at a given level of effort
flat salary - B(e) graph and why
downward curve with linear slope, since disutility increases with effort
with a flat salary, what does principal and agent choose?
With a flat salary, principal chooses pay to maximize revenue - pay - costs but then agent chooses to minimize effort since effort does not correlate with higher net benefit
flat salary - what happens when S and u(e) is 0?
B(e) is 0
what happens when manager pay is scaled to effort?
Manager is now persuaded to increase effort since it will increase manager pay
pay scaled to effort - explain compensation scheme structured in 2 parts
K is fixed amount, U(e) is additional amount that varies with managerial effort
pay scaled to effort - when is manager fully compensated for effort and happy to supply any effort level?
When U(e) = u(e), then B(e) = K
pay scaled to effort - what is S(e)
K + U(e)
pay scaled to effort - what is profit
profit(e) = R(e) - S - C = R(e) - K - U(e) - C
pay scaled to effort - how do owners identify preferred effort level which maximizes output?
find derivative of profit(e) with respect to e = 0, note that only R(e) and U(e) depend on effort
explain MB = MC
Marginal benefit from effort in terms of increased revenue must equal marginal cost of compensating managers for effort
what is marginal benefit?
Marginal benefit is derivative of R(e) wrt e
what is marginal cost?
marginal cost is derivative of u(e) with respect to e
pay scaled to effort - B(e) graph
linear line with y intercept at K
pay scaled to effort - S(e) graph
S(e) is increasing graph with linear slope with Y intercept at K
pay scaled to effort - profit(e) graph
profit(e) is upside down u
pay scaled to effort - R(e) - C graph
R(e) - C is increasing graph with decreasing slope
pay scaled to effort - B(e) formula
Now, B(e) = S(e) - u(e) = K + U(e) - u(e)
incentive compatibility - what do we assume about R(e)?
Assume R(e) is riskless and determined solely by effort of manager
incentive compatibility - what do shareholders need to figure out?
Shareholders then figure out what level of effort is necessary to produce this level of revenue (Solve R for e)
incentive compatibility - S(e) formula
S(e) = U(e) + a*profit(e) where a is the share of profits for managers
incentive compatibility - bonus that owners choose
Owner does not receive bonus until end of period, so owners choose a level of bonus so overall package is competitive and attracts skilled managers
incentive compatibility - profit(e) formula
profit(e) = R(e) - U(e) - C