Lesson 3 Flashcards
CIA torture
“Torture memos” drafted by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) sought to redefine torture in a way that excluded the “enhanced interrogation techniques” used by the CIA. CIA torture prisoners in the Guantánamo Bay.
US ratified CAT in 1994.
Adopted a interpretation of torture, as: “intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, “
Which allows the US to use tools for what other states might define as torture.
Plausible Legality
Authorities in liberal democracies, particularly in the US after 9/11, employ a strategy called “plausible legality” to justify human rights abuses while claiming to act within the law.
(Banning FTF to return to country)
Permits states to violate human rights under a façade of legal compliance but also risks eroding international norms over time.
How is “plausible legality” different from simply breaking the law?
Instead of outright rejecting or ignoring the law, plausible legality tries to manipulate the law to fit the desired outcome.
It seeks to create the appearance of legality, even if the interpretation of the law is highly questionable.
Ambiguities and Loopholes in Legal Frameworks
States has been more aware of the loopholes and gaps in the law. How to solve it? Use less vauge definitions.
Erosion of Human Rights Norms
The sources argue that the practice of “plausible legality,” if left unchecked, can lead to the erosion of human rights norms.
Terrorism as violaters of human rights?
The sources argue that more robust monitoring mechanisms are needed to hold non-state actors accountable for human rights abuses.
Martin Scheinin
Declaring a “War” to Trigger International Humanitarian Law:
ome governments have sought to frame their counter-terrorism efforts as a “war,” arguing that this justifies the application of international humanitarian law, which governs armed conflicts, rather than human rights law.
Martin Scheinin
Terrorism as a crime not a law
The sources argue that acts of terrorism, while serious and requiring a robust response, do not inherently constitute an armed conflict. Instead, they should be treated primarily as a form of crime and addressed within a law enforcement paradigm.
Martin Scheinin
Foreign terrorist fighters
FTFs include all individuals who travel to another state (other than their states of nationality or residence to plan, prepare or participate in acts of terrorism). FTFs also include individuals who provide or receive
terrorist training.
Principle of Subsidiarity
Decisions and actions should be taken as close to the citizen as possible
Right to Enter One’s Country
Issue: FTFs face travel bans and passport cancellations, stranded abroad.
Law:
UDHR Art. 12 (non-binding): Freedom to return to one’s country.
ICCPR Art. 12(4): No arbitrary denial of return.
Duty to Repatriate POWs
Issue: Limited repatriation of women and children detained in Syria.
Law:
Geneva Conv. Art. 118(1): POWs must be repatriated after hostilities end.
Investigating war crimes
Issue: States must prosecute nationals for war crimes.
Law:
ICRC Customary Law: Investigate and prosecute war crimes committed by nationals or in-state.
Territorial Jurisdiction
Concept: States where crimes occur (e.g., Syria/Iraq) hold primary jurisdiction.