Lesson 3 Flashcards

1
Q

CIA torture

A

“Torture memos” drafted by the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) sought to redefine torture in a way that excluded the “enhanced interrogation techniques” used by the CIA. CIA torture prisoners in the Guantánamo Bay.

US ratified CAT in 1994.

Adopted a interpretation of torture, as: “intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, “

Which allows the US to use tools for what other states might define as torture.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Plausible Legality

A

Authorities in liberal democracies, particularly in the US after 9/11, employ a strategy called “plausible legality” to justify human rights abuses while claiming to act within the law.

(Banning FTF to return to country)

Permits states to violate human rights under a façade of legal compliance but also risks eroding international norms over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How is “plausible legality” different from simply breaking the law?

A

Instead of outright rejecting or ignoring the law, plausible legality tries to manipulate the law to fit the desired outcome.

It seeks to create the appearance of legality, even if the interpretation of the law is highly questionable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ambiguities and Loopholes in Legal Frameworks

A

States has been more aware of the loopholes and gaps in the law. How to solve it? Use less vauge definitions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Erosion of Human Rights Norms

A

The sources argue that the practice of “plausible legality,” if left unchecked, can lead to the erosion of human rights norms.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Terrorism as violaters of human rights?

A

The sources argue that more robust monitoring mechanisms are needed to hold non-state actors accountable for human rights abuses.

Martin Scheinin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Declaring a “War” to Trigger International Humanitarian Law:

A

ome governments have sought to frame their counter-terrorism efforts as a “war,” arguing that this justifies the application of international humanitarian law, which governs armed conflicts, rather than human rights law.

Martin Scheinin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Terrorism as a crime not a law

A

The sources argue that acts of terrorism, while serious and requiring a robust response, do not inherently constitute an armed conflict. Instead, they should be treated primarily as a form of crime and addressed within a law enforcement paradigm.

Martin Scheinin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Foreign terrorist fighters

A

FTFs include all individuals who travel to another state (other than their states of nationality or residence to plan, prepare or participate in acts of terrorism). FTFs also include individuals who provide or receive
terrorist training.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Principle of Subsidiarity

A

Decisions and actions should be taken as close to the citizen as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Right to Enter One’s Country

A

Issue: FTFs face travel bans and passport cancellations, stranded abroad.
Law:
UDHR Art. 12 (non-binding): Freedom to return to one’s country.
ICCPR Art. 12(4): No arbitrary denial of return.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Duty to Repatriate POWs

A

Issue: Limited repatriation of women and children detained in Syria.
Law:
Geneva Conv. Art. 118(1): POWs must be repatriated after hostilities end.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Investigating war crimes

A

Issue: States must prosecute nationals for war crimes.
Law:
ICRC Customary Law: Investigate and prosecute war crimes committed by nationals or in-state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Territorial Jurisdiction

A

Concept: States where crimes occur (e.g., Syria/Iraq) hold primary jurisdiction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Right to Fair Trial

A

Issue: Trials in conflict zones lack fairness; inconsistent repatriation policies.
Law:
ICCPR Art. 14: Right to a fair, public, and impartial hearing.

16
Q

ISIS and Child soldairs

A

Recuritet more then 100.000 child soldairs as they are very manipulative and therefore easyu to convince that “if they don’t have the correct interpretation of the Koran was a ‘kafir’ (unbeliever) and had to be eliminated.

Recruited them based kidnapping from orphanage, schools and homes.

Some were inticed by payment.

ISIS served to ‘normalise’ children’s
exposure to violence and death.

Conrad Nyamutata

17
Q

ISIS propeganda

A

Idaeliased their caliphate as for muslims to enjoy status and a sense of a belogning, as well as it was a duty fo r especially sunni muslims. (both genders).

ISIS managed to attract foreign recruits, among them
young men, women and children from Western countries and the USA

Conrad Nyamutata

18
Q

Convention on rights of the Children

A

Optional Protocol on the Involvement of Children in Armed Conflict (2000):

Raises the minimum age for compulsory recruitment and participation in hostilities to 18 years.

Conrad Nyamutata

19
Q

Biopolitics

A

Biopolitics is a system of mechanisms through which species life is regulated.

Michel Foucault

20
Q

Biopower

A

Aims to manage, regulate, and control life’s processes, including the potential risks and dangers associated with them.

Michel Foucault

21
Q

Biopower as a Security Apparatus

A

This apparatus aims to manage and control the uncertainties and risks (contigency) associated with the processes of life itself.

22
Q

Contingency

A

Uncertainty and unpredictability inherent in life and events.

23
Q

PEGASUS as a biopower mechanism

A

PEGASUS is a suverlliance tool to (spysoftware) identify potential risks associated with terror.

Access to:
1. messages,
2. calls,
3. location, and
4. real-time access to a phone’s microphone or camera.

How it interferes with human rights:
1. ICCPR art. 17, that you shouldn’t be subjected to: “ interference with their privacy, family, home, or correspondence”.

Plausible legality:
- Securitization theory, securitized: Immidiate threat that need extraoridinary measures.
- Desecuritizing: never happened, as the fear of terrorism still exists.

24
Q

POW

A

Prisoners of war.
Individuals captured and detained during an armed conflict by an opposing party.

25
Q

FTF

A

Individuals who travel to a country other than their own, often to join terrorist organizations, participate in armed conflicts, or engage in terrorist activities.