Lesson 3 Flashcards

* Lesson 3 * Difference between Ideas and Phantasms * Properties of Ideas: Comprehension, Extension * Classification of Terms

1
Q

T or F
A metaphor is not the same as an analogy.

A metaphor is literally false; an analogy is not.

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

has two or more meanings which are partly the same, partly different and
related to each other.

A

ANALOGICAL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

clear in the way

light is clear: it “comes through” to the mind.

A

CLEAR

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

T or F

Clarity is not quite the same as unambiguousness.

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

has one and only one meaning

A

Univocal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

T or F
negative syllable are with the beginning,
like “un-“ or “non-“ or “in-“. But it is not always so.

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

a lack
of confusion between two meanings.

Unless a term is first of all clear, it cannot
be either ambiguous or unambiguous.

A

Clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

T or F
Strictly speaking no
term as such is ambiguous until it is used ambiguously.

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

it pertains to the individual member of the

group.

A

Divisively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

means having more than one meaning.

A

“Ambiguous”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

T or F

Vague terms are not necessarily ambiguous or unclear.

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

T or F

Vague terms are not necessarily ambiguous or unclear.

A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

means “exaggeration.”

- This is routinely done by “media hype”

A

Hyperbole

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

T or F
To expose the equivocation or double identity of the equivocal term, use
these two steps:

  1. First identify the word or phrase that shifts its meaning
  2. Then identify the two different meanings by using two different
    words or phrases.
A

T

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

There is no fallacy in a slogan as such, but in its use as a substitute for
argument

A

Slogan

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The meaning is indeterminate because of the loose or awkward way in
which its words are combined

A

Amphiboly

17
Q

Instead of proving that the thing it describes is good or bad, it assumes its
value or disvalue in the very description of it

Slanting can also be done by omitting relevant information and by
selecting only favorable or only unfavorable data

A

Slanting

18
Q

Fallacies of Diversion

A

Ready get set GO!!

19
Q

direct attack to the person

A

Ad Hominem

20
Q

“appeal to authority”

A

Ad Verecundiam

21
Q

appeal to force

A

Ad Baculum

22
Q

appeal to pity

A

Ad misericordiam

23
Q

fallacy of believing or doing something only because it is popular

A

Ad populum

24
Q

idea must be true because we do not know that it is not

A

Ad ignorantiam

25
Q

argument addressed to the person

A

Ad Hominem

26
Q

appeal to shame

A

Ad Ignominiam

27
Q

appeal to shame

A

Ad Ignominiam

28
Q

FALLACIES OF OVERSIMPLIFICATION

A

ready get set go

29
Q

Socially-fabricated qualities we attached on different groups or classes.
Like the Dicto simpliciter, it makes no exceptions.

A

Streotyping

30
Q

“Pulling out” an idea and using it to one’s advantage while ignoring all the
other relevant concepts that support the said idea.

A

Quoting out of Context

31
Q

Ignoring the fact that what is true of the part is not necessarily true of the
whole

A

Composition

32
Q

consists in arguing “it is not this one extreme, therefore it must be the
opposite extreme.

A

Black and White Fallacy

33
Q
  • Application of a general principle to a special case without qualification
A

Dicto Simpliciter

34
Q
  • Ignoring the fact that what’s true to the whole is not always true to the part
A

Division

35
Q

fallacy rooted on the principle that something is true in some special
case, therefore it is true simply

A

Special Case