Lesson 2 - Classical Conditioning (Behaviourist Approach) Flashcards
Classical Conditioning Key Assumptions
Concerned with observable behaviour that can be objectively and scientifically measured
All behaviour is learned from the environment and can be reduced to a stimulus-response assosciation
There is little difference between the learning that takes place in humans and non-human animals allowing research to be carried out on animals as well as humans
Classical Conditioning
Behaviourist approach suggests that all behaviour is learnt rather than being innate or inherited
Can be learnt through classical conditioning, which is learning through association
A stimulus produces the same response as another stimulus as they have been consistently presented at the same time
Pavlov (1927)
Russian physiologist credited with the discovery of the process of classical conditioning
Investigated salivating reflexes in dogs when he noticed dogs would not only salivate when food was in their mouths but also when certain stimuli appeared such as their dog bowl
Led Pavlov to explore how dogs had learnt these stimuli meant food was coming
Decided to see if he could teach the dogs to salivate when he rang a bell
Pavlov (1927)
Before Conditoning
Food was an unconditioned stimulus that produced the reflex of salivating, unconditioned response
Bell was a neutral stimulus that produced no conditioned response
Pavlov (1927)
During Conditoning
The unconditioned stimulus (food) was repeatedly paired with the neutral stimulus (bell)
Eventually, the dog associated the bell with food
Pavlov (1927)
After Conditoning
The bell was a conditioned stimulus producing the conditioned response of salivating in the dogs
Classical Conditioning Evaluation Points
Little Albert
Application
Ecological Validity
Age
Menzies
Deterministic
Classical Conditioning Evaluation
Little Albert
Positive
Research by Watson and Rayner in Little Albert study supports Pavlov’s findings of classical conditioning
Study done on an infant so increases validity and can be generalised to humans
However, study has never been repeated on infants or humans so whether the study can be replicated can be questioned
Classical Conditioning Evaluation
Application
Positive
Helped apply classical conditioning to treatments of psychological disorders
Helped form treatments such as flooding and systematic desensitisation which are based on components of classical conditioning and association
Both methods are successful in treating phobias in people
Classical Conditioning Evaluation
Ecological Validity
Negative
Findings from Little Albert study and Pavlov’s study may lack ecological validity
Both studies conducted in a laboratory setting
Results may be different in a real life situation
Classical Conditioning Evaluation
Age
Negative
Classical conditioning may not be strong in explaining how adults learn new behaviours
Studies only done on infants and animals
Therefore classical conditioning is limited on who can be affected
Classical Conditioning Evaluation
Menzies
Negative
Criticised the behaviour model and classical conditioning
Studies people with hydrophobia and found only 2% of his sample have ever had a bad experience with water
Means there are other factors affecting learning, not just classical conditioning
Classical Conditioning Evaluation
Deterministic
Negative
Ignores role of free will
Classical conditioning anticipates an individual will respond to a conditioned stimulus with no variation which is not accurate
People are not passive states and they have control over how they respond to an association between two stimuli
Leads to explanation for behaviour that are incomplete and inconsistent