Lesson 1 : Immigration before 1945 Flashcards
Overview of immigration to the UK before 1945
A country of emigration before being a country of immigration:
- colonies of settlement: opportunity to start fresh
- businessmen in search of new markets, peasants fleeing demographic pressure and economic slump
- main destinations: USA, British settlement colonies (Canada, Australia, South Africa, India)
Yet, a long history of immigration:
- Italian merchants and German businessmen
- French Huguenots fleeing the Counter-Reformation and Jews fleeing the Inquisition in Spain or anti-Semitism in Eastern Europe
- Irishmen escaping economic difficulties
19th century until WW2: most immigrants came from Europe
- Kingdom and Empire: The Formation of Identities of Self and Other
- 1 From Multinational Kingdom to Empire
A union of pre-existing states:
- Wales: conquered by England in 1282; Act of Union (1536)
- Scotland and England: Union of the crowns since 1603; Act of union (1707)
- Ireland: partially conquered in the 12th century; brought under English control in 16th-17th century; Act of Union (1800)
Unbalanced power relationship withing the Union: English hegemony –> England has always dominated politically, economically, and in terms of international recognition; it is easy for foreigners to refer to the whole union as ‘England’. English hegemony is also reflected in the Union flag; It is composed of three different crosses, from Scotland, Ireland and England. The English flag is on top.
However, the national identities of Wales, Scotland and Ireland didn’t suddenly disappear at the Union.
Persistence of Welsh, Scottish and Irish national identities:
- Present-day popularity of Plaid Cymru, the SNP and Sinn Fein
- Nationalist movements in the 19th century
Shaping Britishness –> Britishness developed alongside of, and not in competition with, older, more entranched ‘regional’ identities. Great-Britain was neither the fruits of the blending of different regional cultures, nor the result of the imposition of English culture over all the other nations (Linda Colley). This notion of Britishness was super imposed on an array of older and perhaps more profound regional identities and all of these developed to exist alongside of each other, not in competition with one another. The fact that there is a possibility of navigating between different identities, has had an impact on the integration of minorities.
Factors which helped foster Britishness:
- the Monarchy
- Protestantism
- Empire
‘The Empire on which the Sun never sets’ –> refers to British colonialism. The expanse of the British Empire was colossal, it covered a quarter of the globe. This was bound to have an impact on how British conceived themselves, and how they conceived others.
- Kingdom and Empire: The Formation of Identities of Self and Other
- 2 Empire and Britishness
The Empire served to reinforce the common sense of Britishness of the Scots, English and Welsh:
- Britishness meant more overseas and in the colonies than it did in Britain itself. People in the colonies would not identify themselves as either Scottish, Welsh or English, but as ‘British’.
- Important involvement of the Scots, Welsh, Irish in the Empire (ex: Scottish missionary and explorer David Livingstone).
- National pride in the perceived British technical, political and cultural superiority (cf. Glasgow, ‘Second City of Empire’). Even for the people who didn’t make it to the colonies, the Empire was associated with widespread pride and produced a general perception of British technical, political and cultural superiority. This perception was gradually racialized.
Anglo-Saxonism:
- Racialization of this perceived superiority. There was a collusion between the notion of britishness and the notion of anglo-saxism; a perceived superiority of anglo-saxist culture.
- ‘Anglo-Saxon’ qualities: manliness, pragmatism, valour and good government.
- Other ‘races’ (Celts, Africans, Indians…) perceived as intrinsically lacking these values, therefore deemed unfit for self-government.
- Kingdom and Empire: The Formation of Identities of Self and Other
- 3 Scientific Racism and Imperialism
The development of Scientific Racism in Britain as a pseudo-science
Dr. James Hunt: the main theorizer of Scientific Racism in Britain
- Rejected the Enlightenment stress on the unity of humanity
- Endeavoured to prove the superiority of whites over blacks by means of craniology and comparative anatomy
- From the start there was a connection between Hunt’s scientific racism and imperialism. Hunts project was to see if his theories applied in the West Indies particularly, to be able to manage the colonial territories.
Other racist theories used in the 19th c.
- Social Darwinism (Herbert Spencer and Francis Galton):
- Extended the idea of natural selection by stressing the inevitable destruction of those who were least equipped to survive in a certain society
- These ideas were used as a justification of both class inequalities and racial discrimination
- In the context of Empire, the fate of aboriginal tribes (illness, war, etc.) could be and was indeed read as a confirmation of Social Darwinism applied to race.
Another racist theory was called Aryanism:
- Theory which was influential throughout Europe in the late 19 and early 20th century and was derived from philology.
- Superiority of those who speak Indo-European languages
Influence of Scientific Racism on politicians:
- Joseph Chamberlain: identified the British as ‘the greatest of governing races that the world has ever seen’
- Winston Churchill is also well known for uttering many similar comments on Anglo-Saxon superiority.
Scientific Racism remained strong up to the 1920’s, reaching a peak during WW1, then declined. It lost all it’s credibility during World War 2, the Nazi-German period. Politicians were far more careful about their discourse and avoided reference to such theories and some of the concepts associated to them.
Important to note that many in Britain rejected Scientific Racism:
- Abolitionism was a large movement, even after slavery was abolished.
- Promotion of Humanitarianism: recognition that no difference should be made between human beings on account of race.
- Kingdom and Empire: The Formation of Identities of Self and Other
- 4 Popular Views of the Imperial Other
‘Othering’: treating people as being different and thereby establishing a certain power relation. In the context of the Empire, the Othering of blacks/Africans/Asians was an important part of how imperial power was established. Stereotypes of blacks as “Savages:
- Blacks as simple, primitive and backward people, still untouched by the benefits of civilization.
- Justification for the civilizing mission of the British Empire: Many people believed that Britain was engaged in a civilizing mission to help less advanced people and bring civilization to them.
- Blacks as feral brutes, endowed with formidable physical strength. This image was often shared in the press, and was also expressed in written form by descriptions of the Zulu’s.
- British superiority had to do with intelligence and technology, as opposed to physical strength.
- Anglo-Zulu War (1879)
- Jamaica Revolt (1865)
Stereotypes of Asians:
- Not portrayed as primitive, but as backward in terms of political and social institutions. The cast system was often viewed as a justification that the Indians were unfit for democratic governing. This position was obviously extremely hypocritical because the British used the cast system very consistently to control and hold their power.
- Portrayed as deceitful, violent and fanatic
- Impact of the Indian Rebellion, 1857:
–> Started as a Sepoy mutiny
–> Use of pork and beef fat to grease rifles, often presented as cause for mutiny (causes actually much more complex).
- British Policy on Immigration and Citizenship up to 1905
What is the essential difference in English Common Law between subjects of the crown and ‘aliens’?
Vocabulary:
- Subjects of the monarch: the people who, living within the dominion of the crown, owe loyalty to the British monarch and expect to be protected by him or her. With the formation of the United Kingdom, British subjects included Welsh, Scottish and Irish people.
With the formation of the British Empire, British subjects included people throughout the British Empire.
- Aliens: foreigners who have not acquired citizenship of the country in which they live.
- A foreign / US/ French national: a citizen of another country / of the US / of France.
- British Policy on Immigration and Citizenship up to 1905
What is the principle of Jus solis?
British citizenship based on the principle of Jus solis:
- Any child born within the dominion of the British crown acquired citizenship (even when born to foreign parents, and even if parents not residents, but visitors).
- From the 18th c.: recognition of British rights to those born abroad of British parentage.
- Naturalization Act, 1870: aliens who had served the Crown or had lived in Britain for at least five years could be considered for naturalisation (the legal act or process by which a non-citizen in a country may acquire citizenship or nationality of that country).
- British Policy on Immigration and Citizenship up to 1905
What were the restrictions on non-Protestants up to the 19th century?
Restrictions on non-Protestants up to the 19th c.:
- Even when they were British subjects, religious minorities did not enjoy full political rights:
Test and Corporation Acts (late 1670s) placed restrictions on Catholics, Nonconformists and non-Christians:
- Only members of the Established Church were eligible for public employment or office, including sitting in Parliament
- Restrictions extended to lawyers, members of the universities, schoolteachers, etc.
- Emancipation in 1828 for Nonconformist Protestants (Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts) and 1829 for Catholics (Roman Catholic Relief Act).
- British Policy on Immigration and Citizenship up to 1905
What was the British immigration policy before 1905?
Pre-1905 immigration policy:
Up to the 18th c.:
- Aliens welcome or expelled by virtue of the sovereign’s decision:
- 1243: Statute passed to expel Irish beggars
- 1598: Elizabeth I expelled German merchants
- Until 1783: Travellers could be expelled or imprisoned
Late 18th c. and the late 19th c.:
- Laissez-faire approach: free entry for ‘aliens’
- A corollary of economic liberalism
- Support for refugees fleeing continental oppression
- The Gradual Integration of European Immigrants
Up to the mid-20th century, immigration to Britain massively originated from where?
Up to the mid-20th c., immigration to Britain massively originated from Europe:
- A majority came from Ireland
- The second most important group included Jews, mainly from Germany and Russia
- Other Germans
- Also French people, Italians, East Europeans, etc.
- The Gradual Integration of European Immigrants
3.1 Irish Immigration
Overview of Irish Immigration
Irish migration recorded since the 12th century
Up to the mid-19th century:
- Essentially seasonal migration
- Strong demand for semi- and unskilled labour in Britain since the industrial revolution
- Growing number of landless farmers in Ireland
- Some Irish migrants started to settle in Britain.
The impact of the Irish potato famine (1845-9):
- 1847-1850: 300,000 people moved from Ireland to England
- ‘A refugee crisis’ according to Frank Neal (esp. Liverpool).
Irish immigration slowed down after the 1860s, but Irish people remained the predominant group among immigrants until the second World War.
1931: 505,385 people of Irish birth or Irish descent in Britain.
- The Gradual Integration of European Immigrants
3.1 Irish Immigration
Where did the Irish settle?
Areas of Settlement:
- Many initially intended to sail for the US
- England: primarily in London and in Lancashire (particularly in Liverpool), also in the West Midlands and Yorkshire.
- Scotland: in and around Glasgow.
Concentrated settlement –> Emergence of Irish communities, identifiable by cultural differences, in particular the Catholic faith.
- The Gradual Integration of European Immigrants
3.1 Irish Immigration
What about religion?
Assertion of Catholicism in a Protestant country: forerunning multiculturalism?
Catholic Emancipation:
- Active campaign lead by Irish barrister Daniel O’Connell –> 1829 Roman Catholic Relief Act: according to P. Panayi, it established a precedent and signalled the possibility for religious and ethnic minorities to campaign and successfully obtain equal rights in Parliament.
Despite British citizenship (Act of Union, 1800) and emancipation (1829), Irish migrants to Britain commonly faced discrimination, poverty and hostility.
- The Gradual Integration of European Immigrants
3.1 Irish Immigration
What was the experience of Irish immigrants?
The experience of Irish immigrants:
Poor employment prospects: working-class occupations, often at the lower end of the social ladder.
- The “Street Irish” of 19th c. London: selling nuts, fish, matches
- Many were employed in the construction of railways or as unskilled textile workers (Yorkshire, Lancashire), or domestic servants
- Still employed in unskilled or semi-skilled in early 20th century => limited improvement in employment prospects before the second half of the 20th c.
Anti-Irish hostility:
- Largely rested upon anti-catholicism, culminating in riots (1779 in Scotland; Gordon riots in London, 1780; 1850s). Development of the Orange Order (Northern Ireland; Liverpool, Glasgow…)
- Stereotypes conveyed in the press: the Irish as immoral, unruly and lazy.
- Anglo-saxonism and racist ideas: Irish portrayed as inferiors. Cf. simian imagery.
- The Gradual Integration of European Immigrants
3.1 Irish Immigration
What were the indicators pointing to the gradual integration of Irish migrants?
Indicators pointing to the gradual integration of Irish migrants:
- Size of households, the example of Liverpool:
- From residential segregation to dispersal: the end of Irish ghettos
- Gradual inclusion of the Irish in mainstream national politics:
–> Long voted for Irish nationalist parties, but increasingly turned to the Liberals and then Labour from the late 19th c.
The Irish have increasingly become ‘invisible’ as an ethnic group following the arrival of other migrants.