Legitimacy, Separation of Powers & Rule of Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What buttresses the legitimacy of the UK constitution? Why are they important?

A

The rule of law and separation of powers are two key constitutional principles that buttress the legitimacy of the UK’s constitution and prevent the arbitrary exercise of power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the definition of the rule of law?

A

every person should be governed by and benefit from the laws of the land. These laws should be clearly stated, understood and administered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the doctrine of the separation of powers?

A

Each branch of the state has a different role to play within the constitution and there shouldn’t be any overlaps as this could lead to a concentration of power and an arbitrary and oppressive government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is in place to deal with overlaps in the branches of the state?

A

Due to the complex way modern states work, it would be unrealistic for each branch to be completely separate so most constitutions have developed the concept of checks and balances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How is there a separation of powers between the executive and legislature?

A

Statute provides:
1. certain members of the executive (i.e. civil servants, police and armed forces) cannot be MPs
2. there are limits on the number of government ministers that can sit in the HoC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How is there an overlap between the executive and legislature?

A
  1. Government ministers can be MPs
  2. There are arguments the government effectively controls the legislature, i.e:
    o Most bills are introduced by government ministers
    o Delegated legislation is implemented by ministers
    o Henry VIII powers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What checks and balances are in place to deal with the overlap between the executive and legislature?

A

o Time is set aside each day for MPs to put oral questions to ministers
o Prime Minister’s Question Time
o All government bills are referred to a public bill committee of MPs who review the detailed clauses in the bill in the Second Reading
o Parliamentary Ombudsman - their job is to investigate complaints by people who have suffered injustice by maladministration by government departments
o Ministers are accountable through conventions, particularly conventions of individual and collective responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What does s3 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 provide?

A

The government is under a duty to uphold the independence of the judiciary and individual ministers should not seek to influence decisions through special access to the judiciary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

In the UK, how is judiciary independence from the executive secured?

A

o Appointment - judges are appointed by the Judicial Appointment Committee which is politically impartial and free from executive control.
o Judges can only be dismissed following a vote of both Houses of Parliament, not because they give a bad judgement the government disagrees with.
o Judges’ salaries are determined by an independent body.
o Constitutional conventions i.e. the government cannot criticise judicial decisions and the judiciary do not engage in party political activity.
o The sub-judice rule
o The introduction of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the sub-judice rule?

A

Parliament refrains from discussing matters in court or waiting to be heard by the court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

In which areas have the legislature and judiciary been unable to exercise effective scrutiny over the executive?

A

When the government exercises powers under the Royal Prerogative. This is because they are set of legal powers that the monarch or government ministers can use without parliamentary consent

In addition, the judiciary consider these areas to be ‘non-justiciable’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What constitutional convention attempts to provide some scrutiny by the legislature over the government?

A

In 2011, the Government acknowledged that a convention had developed in Parliament that before troops were committed the House of Commons should have an opportunity to debate the matter and said that it proposed to observe that Convention except where there was an emergency and such action would not be appropriate.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What was the role of the Lord Chancellor pre-2005?

A

The Lord Chancellor was a government minister and head of the judiciary of E&W and they appointed senior members of the Judiciary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Why was the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 introduced?

A

One of the reasons is because it was felt there was too much overlap between the executive and judiciary. Particularly in relation to the Lord Chancellor and some of the quasi-judicial functions government ministers undertook

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What changes did the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 introduce?

A

o The Lord Chancellor was no longer head of the judiciary. This was transferred to the Lord Chief Justice
o The Judicial Appointments Committee was created to ensure that the appointment of judges is based solely on merit and not influenced but political considerations. This is an independent body.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the appointment process for certain judges (not inc. Supreme Court judges)? List the relevant judges.

A

Relevant to:
o Lord Chief Justice
o Master of the Rolls
o Lord Justices of Appeal
o President of the Family Division
o King’s Bench Division
o High Court Justice
o (there is a similar process for lower judges)

  1. The Lord Chancellor will usually ask the Judicial Appointment Committee to convene a selection panel and select a candidate for their recommendation
  2. The Lord Chancellor must consult with the Lord Chief Justice before making any recommendation
  3. The Lord Chancellor then makes a recommendation to the PM
  4. The PM advises the Monarch who makes the appointment
16
Q

How are Supreme Court judges appointed?

A
  1. There will be a ‘selection commission’ consisting of:
    o The president of the Supreme Court
    o A senior judge nominated by the President
    o One member from each of the three judicial appointment bodies
  2. The selection commission will recommend a candidate to the Lord Chancellor
  3. The Lord Chancellor will make a recommendation to the PM
  4. The PM will advise the monarch on who to appoint
17
Q

What general principle applies when a judge is being picked for recommendation?

A

They are selected solely on merit.

When there are two or more judges of equal merit, the judge who possess a characteristic which may increase diversity can be chosen

18
Q

What is an example of a quasi-judicial function which has been abolished and one which is still in place?

A

Abolished - the removal of the Home Secretary’s power to determine the length of tariff for prisoners given a life sentence

Still in place - compulsory purchase orders.

19
Q

How can the judiciary hold the executive to account?

A

The judiciary does not have the power to declare actions of the executive as unconstitutional. However, judicial review enables the judiciary to ensure that the executive does not exceed or abuse its powers and that decisions made follow the correct procedure

20
Q

What is a quasi-judicial function?

A

A quasi-judicial function is a function that resembles a judicial function, but differs in that it depends on executive discretion rather than the application of law.

21
Q

Can the decisions made under the royal prerogative be judicially reviewed?

A

Yes, but there are limits.

Judges are prepared to comment on the existence of a royal prerogative power, but they are reluctant to comment on the exercise of the power once it has been established.

22
Q

What is the case law position regarding the extent of royal prerogative powers?

A

New prerogative powers cannot be created and existing powers cannot be extended.

23
Q

What is the case law position regarding the exercise of royal prerogative powers?

A

Judges are reluctant to comment on the exercise of RP once it has been established. Case law suggests they are someone more willing to review some exercises of prerogative powers, but some are non-justiciable

24
Q

Why are judges not prepared to comment on the exercise of the royal prerogative powers? What is the consequence of this?

A

Because these issues are highly political. They don’t want to risk becoming politicised.

The consequence of this means that the exercise of royal prerogative powers are beyond the scrutiny of the judiciary

25
Q

What are the ‘non-justicable’ prerogative powers the courts are not prepared to comment on the exercise of?

A

o Making international treats
o Control of the armed forces
o Defence of the realm
o Dissolution of Parliament
o Granting public honour

26
Q

What statutory methods are in place to keep the legislature and judiciary separate?

A

o Holders of judicial office are disqualified from being an MP
o Conventions i.e. MP will not criticise judges and judges will not become involved in political affairs
o Sub-judice rule
o Parliamentary privilege (i.e. because they are protected from legal sanction in some respects)
o The judiciary does not have the power to deem law unconstitutional

27
Q

What are the concerns regarding the politicisation of the judiciary?

A

o Judges are appointed to chair public inquiries i.e. Grenfell
o Judges have been drawn into controversial political issues with the introduction of the HRA into our legal system
o Sometimes MPs have breached conventions about not criticising the judiciary, particularly if a criminal offender receives a lenient sentence

28
Q

How did the overlap between the legislative and judiciary change post-2005?

A

o The act created the Supreme Court which replaced the HOL
o New justices of the Supreme Court do not receive peerage from the HOL
o The Lord Chancellor is no longer the Speaker. The speaker is elected by the HOL.

29
Q

Why do some people argue that the judiciary exercises a legislative function? How is this limited?

A

The judiciary interprets legislation and develops common law.

This is limited by parliamentary sovereignty (i.e. statute precede case law) and judges cannot declare law unconstitutional (albeit they can say it is incompatible with HTA, but this has no legal effect).

30
Q

Why did Lord Hailsham describe the United Kingdom’s government as being an “elective dictatorship”?

A

Every five years or so, the public elects a new Executive; until the public vote again the Executive can usually take control of the legislative agenda because the Executive dominates the Legislature when it has a majority in Parliament, and the public cannot remove the Executive from office.