European Convention on Human Rights Flashcards
what effect does the ECHR have on the UK?
the UK is bound by the ECHR as it is international law. UK law must give effect to the rights in the ECHR.
what is the ECHR?
an international treaty
what can happen if a country breaches the ECHR?
other member states can bring proceedings before the ECtHR
individuals can bring applications before ECtHR
what effect do judgments of the ECtHR have on the UK?
courts have to consider decisions made by the ECtHR but that doesn’t mean they have to follow them.
how is the ECHR incorporated into UK law?
HRA 1998
what must an individual do before bringing an ECtHR claim?
exhaust all domestic remedies. They will need to prove this.
what is the time limit for an individual to bring an ECtHR claim?
the petition must be made within 4 months of the final decision (i.e. usually the decision of the highest court with jurisdiction)
what are the requirements for an individual to bring a ECtHR claim?
- exhausted all domestic remedies
- bring the claim within 4m of the final decision
- personally and directly be a victim of the ECHR violation
- have suffered significant disadvantage
what are the stages when a case is before ECtHR?
- admissibility stage
- merits stage
explain the admissibility stage
A single judge can declare an application inadmissible if it is clearly unfounded
these decisions cannot be appealed.
explain the merits stage
- Cases following established case law are reviewed by a three-member Committee, which delivers a final decision or judgment.
- Other cases are heard by a Chamber of judges, whose judgment becomes final after three months unless referred to the Grand Chamber.
- The Grand Chamber may reconsider referred cases and issue a final judgment, often after a public hearing if needed.
what are absolute rights?
ECHR rights that can never be interfered with. States must uphold them at all times.
what are limited rights?
ECHR rights that can be limited in certain, specific situations
what are qualified rights?
ECHR rights that can be interfered with in order to protect a general interest or the rights of others
how can you distinguish between an absolute and limited right?
there is some disagreement as to which rights are absolute and limited, but generally:
absolute rights will include exceptions. These exceptions do not count as an interference, they help to define the boundaries of the right.
whereas limited rights will list circumstances that will amount to an interference, but the interference is justified
summary:
exception = no interference
listed interference = interference, but justified
which rights are absolute?
art 2 - right to life
art 3 - freedom from torture
art 4 - freedom from slavery
art 6 - right to a fair trial
art 7 - punishment according to existing law
art 9 - freedom of through
art 12 - right to marry
which rights are limited?
art 5 - liberty and security of a person
art 6 - fair trial in relation to public trial
which rights are qualified?
art 8 - respect for private and family life
art 9 - freedom of through in relation to manifestation of freedom in worship
art 10 - freedom of expression
art 11 - freedom of assembly
art 1 of Protocol 1 - right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions
when is a restriction on a qualified right lawful?
For restrictions on qualified rights to be lawful, they must:
The restriction must be expressly outlined in the ECHR
it must be explicitly prescribed by law.
Serve a legitimate aim outlined in the ECHR.
Be necessary and proportionate in addressing a pressing social need.
what is meant by a restriction on a qualified right?
a limitation or interference with someones right
the government is allowed to restrict a qualified ECH right if if it lawful, for a legitimate aim and necessary and proportionate
re: qualified rights
explain ‘prescribed by law’
The restriction must be grounded in domestic law that is clear and accessible.
Citizens must be able to foresee the legal consequences of their actions.
re: qualified rights
explain ‘legitimate aim’
Restrictions must pursue one or more of the legitimate aims listed in the ECHR:
National security, public safety, or economic well-being.
Prevention of disorder or crime.
Protection of health, morals, or the rights of others.
Ensuring judicial authority and impartiality.
re: qualified rights
what is meant by ‘necessary in a democratic society’
- that there is a pressing social need i.e. the restriction addresses an urgent societal issue and interference is necessary, rather than desirable
- it is proportionate i.e. the interference must be proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued, meaning it should not go beyond what is strictly necessary.
there is a margin of appreciation when deciding what is necessary
what is meant by derogation?
A derogation allows a state to temporarily suspend certain obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) during extreme circumstances, such as war or a public emergency that threatens the life of the nation.
when can derogations be made?
Article 15 of the ECHR permits derogations only:
In times of war or
During a public emergency threatening the life of the nation.
what are the conditions for derogations?
Derogations must meet the following criteria:
- Proportionality: The derogation measures must be strictly required by the situation.
- Notification: The state must notify the Council of Europe about the derogation, specifying the measures and reasons.
what rights cannot be derogated? why is this the case?
Certain rights cannot be derogated, even during emergencies:
Article 3: Prohibition of torture and inhuman treatment.
Article 4(1): Prohibition of slavery and servitude.
Article 7: No punishment without law (prohibition of retrospective criminal offenses).
Article 2: Right to life, except for deaths resulting from lawful acts of war
this is because some violations are so severe that they are unacceptable under any circumstances, even during war.
what is the effect or derogation in UK courts?
While a derogation is in operation, UK courts cannot enforce the suspended Convention rights.
briefly explain art 2 (right to life) and the exceptions
it is an absolute right, it prohibits taking of life and places a positive duty on the state to protect life
exceptions (this means there is no interference with the right):
- the death penalty is prohibited
- lawful killings from lawful acts of war are permitted
it also allows the force resulting in death if:
1) it is absolutely necessary; and
2) it pursues one of these objectives:
- defending someone from unlawful violence
- effecting lawful arrest of preventing escape of a detainee
3. quelling a riot or insurrection lawfully