Legislation and the Compensation System Flashcards
Establishes the Workers’ Compensation Board of B.C. (WorkSafeBC) as an entity and sets out our mandate. The Act provides the legal authority and framework for all our activities, including our occupational health and safety activities.
WORK COMPENSATION ACT
Father of Canadian Workers’
Compensation
Sir William R. Meredith
Why did Countries start Worker’s
Compensation Systems?
RISING COURT COSTS
PROTRACTED SETTLEMENTS
LARGE JUDGEMENTS
POSSIBLY BANCKRUPTING FIRM
COURTS BURDENED WITH CASES
Meredith’s five principles
COMPENSATION WITHOUT FAULT
ACCIDENT FUND
COLLECTIVE LIABILITY ON PART OF EMPLOYERS
ADMINISTRATIVE BODY TO COLLECT ASSESSMENTS AND DISPERSE BENEFITS
ADJUDICATIVE BODY TO DETERMINE AMOUNT OF COMPENSATION
Historic compromise
Workers exchange the right to sue their employer for NO FAULT compensation.
The principle any legislation passed based on…
“… THAT INDUSTRY BEAR THE BURDEN OF ITS ACCIDENTS AND THAT COSTS SHOULD BE ASSESSED ON THE EMPLOYERS… THE SAME AS OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE COST OF PRODUCTION”
Additional principles added by Pineo
WORKER’S COMPENSATION SYSTEM SHOULD BE RESPONSIBLE FOR HEALTH AND SAFETY
THERE MUST BE A SYSTEM TO ENSURE FUNDS IN THE FUTURE
Worker’s Compensation Board
COMPENSATION
REHABILITATION
OCCUPATIONAL SATETY & HEALTH
Worksafe BC Mission
CHAMPION SAFE AND HEALTHY WORKPLACES
SAVE LIVES AND PREVENT INJURY AND DISABILITY
DELIVER OUTSTANDING SERVICE TO WORKERS AND EMPLOYERS
PROVIDE AND SUPPORT EXCELLENT MEDICAL AND REHABILITATIVE CARE TO WORKERS
PRESERVE THE FINANCIAL INTEGRITY AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE COMPENSATION SYSTEM
LEARN, LEAD, AND SHARE
Principles of compensation
ESSENTIALLY SAME ACROSS CANADA
NO FAULT INSURANCE POLICY
COSTS PAID BY EMPLOYERS
VIRTUALLY ALL INDUSTRIES COVERED
WorkSafe BC Mandate
Develop regulations.
Inspection & Investigations
OSO (Occupational Safety Officer)
OHO ( Occupational Hygience Officer)
EDUCATE / PROMOTE HEALTH AND SAFETY
MAINTAIN STATISTICS
Compliance
EDUCATION
CONSULTATION
INSPECTION
ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION
STOP WORK
PENALTIES
PROSECUTION
Considerations for additional assessment
SERIOUSNESS OF THE HAZARD
EMPLOYER’S KNOWLEDGE OF HAZARD OR VIOLATION
FIRM’S HISTORY OF COMPLIANCE.
EFFECTIVE PROGRAM OF COMPLIANCE
TRAINING OF WORKERS AND SUPERVISORS
SUPERVISION OF WORKERS
GENERAL NEGLECT OR COMPLACEMENT ATTITUDE
DELIBERATE ATTITUDE OF NON-COMPLIANCE
Prosecutions
VIOLATIONS RESULT IN DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY
WCB OFFICERS ARE DELIBERATEY ONSTRUCTED FROM PERFORMING THEIR DUTIES
WORKERS ARE CONTINUOUSLY EXPOSED TO A HAZARD DESPITE REPEAT ORDERS, WARMING LETTERS OR PENALTIES
NON-COMPLIANCE WITH CLOSURE ORDER.
Everyone who undertakes, or has the authority, to direct how another person does work or performs a task is under a legal duty to take reasonable steps to prevent bodily harm to that person, or any other person, arising from that work or task,
WEST BILL (217.1 Criminal Code) “ Duty of Care”.