legal systems: criminal courts and sentencing, part a Flashcards
what court will hear the case? (4)
- all criminal cases start in the magistrates court
- depending on the seriousness of the case and whether it is in the magistrates jurisdiction, the case may be tried in the crown court
- magistrates can sentence up to 6 months for two offences
- crown court: judges have no limit for sentencing
summary offences (4)
- least serious, minor sentences
- always tried in magistrates court
- includes nearly all driving offences, unless someone was killed
- includes common assault, criminal damage (less than £5000), shoplifting (value of goods less than £200)
triable either-way offences (5)
- either magistrates or crown court
- includes theft (£200+), assault, sec 47, robbery with no threat to life
- if guilty, then sentence
- if not guilty, the defendant has the right to ask to be tried at crown court
- magistrate can decide if this case is too serious, to send to the crown court
indictable offences (4)
- tried in crown court
- most serious offences: muder, manslaughter, rape, sec 18, robbery
- starts in magistrate (preliminary hearing) then transferred
- guilty plea = judge sentence
pre-trial procedure: summary offences (4)
- under the ‘better case management scheme’ the aim is to complete the case at the earliest possible hearing
- if he pleads guilty, already legally represented or does not want legal representation, the magistrates will go ahead with the case and where possible decide the sentence
- many driving offences can be dealt with at the first hearing through a procedure where the defendant can plea guilty
- if not guilty: magisrates must at the first hearing discover the issues involved in the case, so it can proceed as quickly as possible
triable either way offences, 5 steps
- defendant is asked if he pleads guilty or not guilty
- if guilty: defendant has no right for case to be heard at crown court, however, magistrates can send it there for sentence
- if not guilty: then the magistrate must carry out ‘mode of trial’ proceedings, to decide if the case will be heard at the magistrate or crown court
- if the case is suitable for trial in the magistrates court, courts act, have to consider seriousness of case
- cases involving complex questions of facts or law should be sent to the crown court
defendants election (3)
- if the magistrates are prepared to accept jurisdiction then the defendant is told he has the right to choose trial by the jury, but may be tried by the magistrates if he chooses
- warned: if tried by magistrates and found guilty, they can send him to the crown court for sentence if their powers are insufficient
- if defendant elects crown court: all pretrial matters will be dealt with here
appeals and appellate courts (5)
- appeals can take place from either the magistrates court or crown court
- there is a specific process to follow
- there are specific reasons when you can appeal
- there are separate rules for prosecution and defence
- thew routes of appeal from the magistrates court are completely different to that from the crown court
C v DPP point of law
a child of this age could only be convicted if the prosecution proved that the child knew he was doing wrong
appeals from the crown court (2)
- rights of appeal for both the defendant and prosecution
- against the decision of a judge
appeals by the defendant (3)
- leave to appeal
- must get leave from the court of appeal
- considered by single judge of the Court of Appeal in private (if he refuses defence can then appeal to a full court of appeal for leave)
grounds for appeal - criminal appeal act 1995 (a+b)
(a) shall allow an appeal against conviction if they think that the conviction is unsafe
(b) shall dismiss such an appeal in any other case
new evidence for grounds of appeal
any new evidence which the appeal wants to produce at the appeal must appear to be capable of belief and would afford a ground of appeal
court of appeals powers (5)
- if unsafe, they can allow appeal and quash the conviction
- vary the conviction: lesser offence
- if conviction safe, the appeal dismissed
- order of retrial, in front of new judge
- if appeal against sentence, court can decrease the sentence but cannot increase it on the defendants appeal
appeals by the prosecution: originally
prosecution had no right to appeal against either the verdict or sentence
appeals by the prosecution: gradually
some limited rights of appeal have been given by parliament
appeals by the prosecution: against a judges ruling (2)
- if the trial judge gives a ruling on a point of la which effectively stops the case against the defendant, the prosecution now has the right to appeal against the hearing
- criminal justice act 2003: makes sure that an error of law by the judge does not lead to an acquittal (jury coming back and saying they aren’t guilty)
appeals by the prosecution: against acquittal (3)
2 limited situations in which the prosecution can appeal against acquittal by a jury:
1. acquittal the result of the jury being ‘nobbled’. criminal procedure and investigations act 1996 allows the prosecution to appeal
2. where there is new and compelling evidence of the acquitted persons guilt and it is in the public interest for the defendant to be retried - double jeopardy rule
- criminal justice act 2003: only available for 30 series offences: murder, manslaughter, rape and terroism offences
appeals by the prosecution: referring a point of law (2)
where a judge may have made an error in explaining the law to the jury
- sec 26 criminal justice act 1972 allows the attorney general to refer the point of law to the court of appeal in order to get a ruling on the law
appeals by the prosecution: against a sentence
sec 36 criminal justice act 1988: the attorney general can apply for leave to refer an unduly lenient sentence to the court of appeal for a resistance
further appeals to the supreme court (3)
- both the prosecution and the defence may Appel from the court of appeal to the supreme court
- must have to leave to appeal from either court
- only a few criminal appeals to the supreme court each year
aims of sentencing: section 142 criminal justice act 2003
sets out the purposes of sentencing (5) for those aged 18 or over, saying a court must have regard for:
1. the punishment of offenders
2. reduction in crime, including its reduction in deterrence
3. reform and rehabilitation of offenders
4. protection of the public
5. the making of reparation by offenders to persons affected by their offences
retribution
the idea of punishment
tariff sentencing
each defence should be given a certain tariff or level of sentencing. judges use the sentencing council procedures guidelines for all main categories of offence