Legal Part B Flashcards
Strengths of parliament as law-making bodies
- can act quickly if needed
- can make laws on any topic
- ensure society’s views are debated and represented clearly
- reflective of the majority’s values
- supreme law making body
Weaknesses of parliaments as law-making bodies
- legislation can become outdated
- can not always act quickly
- debate may obstruct legislation from being passed
- may not always represent the majority of people (can be influenced by pressure groups)
- does not have full power (needs referendum to change constitution)
- Statues are worded badly (could leave loopholes in the law)
Strengths of courts as law-making bodies
- make decisions quickly
- free from political pressure (can make law on controversial topics)
- Are flexible and allow growth in the law (won’t become rigid)
- Judges are experts
Weaknesses of courts as law-making bodies
- can only make law on the case before them
- judges are conservative
- may be bounded by an outdated precedent
- judges’ resources are limited (only use facts presented to them)
The parliament of AUS
Queen + Governor-general + senate + House of reps
The parliament of QLD
Queen + Governor + Legislative assembly
VP1
Viewpoint 1
VP2
Viewpoint 2
N&S
Nature and Scope
C1
consequence 1
C2
consequence 2
Intro sentence
The role of Australian courts and parliaments as law-making bodies is an issue of concern and can be viewed from several different parliaments - answer the question directly in the sentence
N&S
- what they do (statue law, all areas, reflect society’s values, supreme)
- what are they (bodies made of elected members, 93)
- Additional SOURCE 1 and SOURCE 2 (one about each)
VP1
There is a strong viewpoint…
This is evidenced in stimulus…
Additionally Stimulus…asserts
Consequently,
VP2
A second viewpoint is…
Stimulus…suggests…
Also, stimulus…indicates…
Therefore…