legal foundations Flashcards

1
Q

Lesson one

Define social cohesion

A

The ability of a community to live together in a peaceful, orderly and harmonious manner by recognising that all people have rights and responsibilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lesson one

Define the protection of individual rights

A

All individuals have basic rights, such as the right to life, the right to privacy and the right to practice a religion. law ensure that individual rights are protected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lesson one

Define rules

A

Non legal guidelines which apply to a specific group of people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lesson one

Who are rules made by?

A

Rules are made by non legal institutions
e.g. families, sporting clubs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lesson one

Who are rules interpreted by?

A

Rules are interpreted by sporting associations, parents, school administration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lesson one

Who are rules enforced by?

A

Rules are enforced by non legal individuals
e.g. umpires and parents

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lesson one

What could happen if you break a rule?

A

Breaking a rule could result in receiving a ban, fine, detention or becoming grounded

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lesson one

Define law

A

Legal rules that everyone in society must follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lesson one

Who are laws made by?

A

Laws are made by parliament, subordinate authorities and courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lesson one

Who are laws interpreted by?

A

Laws are interpreted by the courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lesson one

Who are laws enforced by?

A

Laws are enforced by police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lesson one

What are the consequences of breaking laws?

A

Breaking a law can result in receiving a sanction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lesson one

What are the contributing factors that contribute to social cohesion?

A

Role of the law
Role of individual
Role of the legal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lesson one

How do individuals play a role in achieving social cohesion?

A

Respecting human rights
Assisting police with investigations (being a witness)
Reporting crimes
Using the legal system to resolve disputes
= choosing to follow the law or not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lesson one

How does the legal system play a role in achieving social cohesion?

A

Protects rights of individuals when disputes arise
Enforces consequences when individuals break a law
Enforces the law to ensure that rights are upheld and society functions effectively

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lesson one

How does the law play a role in achieving social cohesion?

A

Establishes a framework within which people live
Set boundaries on behaviour (what is acceptable and unacceptable)
Allow individuals to make choices about how they live
Protect rights of individuals
Establishes guidelines for sanctions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Lesson two

What are the three principles of justice?

A

Fairness, equality and access

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Lesson two

Define fairness

A

Impartial and just treatment or behaviour without favouritism or discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Lesson two

What are examples of fairness in the legal system?

A

Right to silence when being questioned by police
Ability of young people to have a parent or guardian present when being questioned by police
Being informed of the crimes with which you have been charged
Being able to access legal representation
Having access to an interpreter if needed
Receiving a fair trial
Being given adequate time to prepare your case
Right to a fair trial and public hearing before an independent and impartial court
Presumption of innocence
Right to examine witnesses in court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Lesson two

What does fairness ensure?

A

Fairness ensures all are treated fairly and impartially without fear or favouritism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Lesson two

Define equality

A

The state of being equal especially in status, rights or opportunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Lesson two

What are examples of equality in the legal system?

A

Both parties have a right to legal representation
Both parties have equal opportunity to present their case
Both parties are treated equally with regard to strict rules of evidence and procedure in court
The judge is an independent and impartial adjudicator who treats both parties equally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Lesson two

What are examples of equality in the legal system?

A

Both parties have a right to legal representation
Both parties have equal opportunity to present their case
Both parties are treated equally with regard to strict rules of evidence and procedure in court
The judge is an independent and impartial adjudicator who treats both parties equally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Lesson two

What does equality ensure?

A

Equality ensures all are treated equally or alike with the same status, rights and opportunities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Lesson two

Define access

A

The means or opportunity to access the legal system

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Lesson two

What are examples of access in the legal system?

A

Access to an interpreter if needed
The ability to access legal representation even if you cannot afford to pay (legal aid)
Being able to access a court in your geographic area
Having access to the evidence that will be presented against you in court
Having right to appeal the courts decision (access to a higher court)
Ensures all have the means or opportunity to attain dispute settlement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Lesson three

What are the 5 characteristics of an effective law?

A
  1. Reflect society’s values
  2. Enforceable
  3. Known
  4. Clear and understandable
  5. Stable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Lesson three

What does it mean for a law to reflect soceity’s values?

A

The law reflects the moral values and beliefs of the society in which it operates.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Lesson three

What does it mean for a law to be enforceable?

A

Laws need to be enforceable to ensure that justice can occur
e.g. fines, imprisonment, police, transit officers

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Lesson three

What does it mean for a law to be known?

A

Laws must be known in order for people to follow them. Ignorance of the law is not an excuse - advertising campaigns (newspaper, websites, billboards ect.) to raise awarness ad make the law clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Lesson three

What does it mean for a law to be clear and undertsandabl?

A

Laws should be written in plain English (no legal jargon) so that people can understand the intention of the law because if people do not understand the law, they will not follow it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Lesson four

What does it mean for a law to be stable?

A

Laws shouldn’t continue to change rapidly otherwise they can become confusing and inconsistent
however, laws need to be flexible enough to overcome future problems and reflect society’s values

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Lesson four

How can laws be classified?

A

The two ways in which laws can be classified is by the source of the law (i.e. the institution that made the law) and the type of law (i.e. criminal or civil law)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

lesson four

What are the two sources of law?

A

parliaments and courts
with both having the abillity to make laws however parliament is the supreme law making body

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Lesson four

parliament

A

Main role is to make laws.
Known as statute law / legislation / acts of parliament

35
Q

Lesson four

Courts

A

Main function of the courts is to settle disputes by interpreting and applying the law however can also make laws, known as common law / judge-made law / case law / precedent

36
Q

Lesson four

What is criminal law concerned with?

A

criminal law is concerned with protecting the community as a whole and controlling behaviour by punishing offenders
e.g. of crimes inc. homocide, assault and theft

37
Q

Lesson four

What is civil law concerned with?

A

Civil law is concerned with protecting the rights of individuals by providing remedies which restore the plaintiff to their original state
e.g. of civil law inc. negligence, defamation and contract

38
Q

Lesson four

Criminal law vs Civil law
(Aim)

A

Criminal law: protection of te community as a whole
Civil law: protection os individual rights

39
Q

Lesson four

Criminal law vs Civil law
(parties)

A

Criminal law: prosecution rep the crown / Defence rep the accused on trial
Civil law: plaintiff, party whose rights have been infringed / Defendant, party being sued

40
Q

Lesson four

Criminal law vs Civil law
(burden of proof)

A

Criminal law: prosecution to prove the wrongdoing of the accused
Civil law: plaintiff to prove the wrongdoing of the defendant

41
Q

Lesson four

Criminal law vs Civil law
(standard of proof)

A

Criminal law: beyond reasonable doubt
Civil law: on the balance of probabilities

42
Q

Lesson four

Criminal law vs Civil law
(outcomes)

A

Criminal law: sanctions
Civil law: remedies

43
Q

Lesson four

Criminal law vs Civil law
(jury)

A

Criminal law: compulsory in CC and SC however it is not used in the MC. Not used in appeals or when plea of guilty is entered. Made up of 12 jurors
Civil law: optional in civil trials, requested by at least one of the parties. Made up of 6 jurors

44
Q

Lesson five

What does the Australian constitution do?

A

Sets out the guidelines and principles for how country is governed and lays down the authority of the government and parliament and est. the division of powers

45
Q

Lesson five

Define specific powers

A

The power of the Commonwealth Parliament to make laws ‘for the peace, order and good government of the commonwealth’ is specifically stated in section 51 of the constitution.
e.g. defence, taxation and marriage

46
Q

Lesson five

Define exclusive powers

A

Section 52 of the constitution states that the Commonwealth parliament has exclusive power to legislate in certain areas
e.g. printing $, defence, immigration

47
Q

Lesson five

Define concurrent powers

A

Powers that are shared by both Commonwealth and state parliaments
e.g. taxation, education, health

48
Q

Lesson five

Define residual powers

A

Any power that was not specifically mentioned in the Constitution as being a power given to the Commonwealth Pariament remained a state power. these included large areas of law making such as criminal and civil law, health and education

49
Q

Lesson five

What are inconsistent laws?

A

Stated in section 59 of the constitution provides for cases where a state introduces law which is inconsistent with a commonwealth law. in such situations, the Commonwealth law will prevail to the extent of the inconsistency

50
Q

Lesson five

What is the role of the Senate?

A

Reviews bills introduced from the lower house
Introduces and passes bils

51
Q

lesson five

What is the senate?

A

76 senators. known as the ‘house of review’ or the ‘States’ house’ because each state / territory has equal representation, regardless of population

52
Q

Lesson five

What is the role of the house of representatives?

A

Introduces bills
Reviews bills passed by the uppoer house
Holds government

53
Q

Lesson five

What is the crown (in Commonwealth and Victorian parliament)

A

Representative of the King
The (Commonwealth: Governor General / Victorian: Governor) gives royal assent to laws passed by both houses of parliament

54
Q

Lesson five

What is the House of Representatives?

A

151 members representing electorates with approx. the same number of voters in each electorate

55
Q

Lesson five

What is the Legislative Council (upper house)

A

40 members
Designed to ensure that rural and metropolitan areas are given equal representation (based on area, not population)

56
Q

Lesson five

What is the Legislative Assembly (lower house)?

A

88 members
Electorates divided based on population

57
Q

Lesson six

What is a precedent?

A

A legal principle developed by a court which all lower courts in the court hierarchy must follow
Noted in the judgement
Can be est. through statutory interpretation and by way of common law decision

58
Q

Lesson six

What are the two parts of a judgement?

A

Ratio decidendi
Obiter dictum

59
Q

Lesson six

What is the ratio decidendi

A

The reasoning behind the decision

60
Q

Lesson six

What is the obiter dictum?

A

A comment made ‘by the way’. These do not form part of the reasoning for the decision, or part of the precedent, but can influence future cases

61
Q

Lesson six

What is common law precendent?

A

Formed when there is a case before the court for which there is no existing law (test case)
A new situation before the courts = no legislation and no previously-made common law
Court must make a decision and reasoning behind this decision (ratio decideni) will form precedent to be followed in the future

62
Q

Lesson six

What is an example of a case which is a common law precedent?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

63
Q

Lesson six

What is statutory interpretation?

A

When a case comes before the courts for which there is existing legislation, if legislation already exits in an area of law, courts will sometimes need to interpret how it applies to the case they are hearing. Interpretation will be required if there is confusion or uncertainty about terms used within the relevant act of parliament

64
Q

Lesson six

How can courts determine the meaning of terms within the law?

A

Courts might consult an interpretation act or they might refer to the 2nd readings speeches made in parliament to determine the intent of parliament in making the law. Courts can also refer to both legal and standard English dictionaries and previous courts decisions

65
Q

Lesson six

What is a example of a case which is statutory interpretation?

A

Studded belt case.
The court had to determine whether the studded belt was a regulated weapon according to the Control of Weapons Act 1990 (Vic)

66
Q

Lesson six

What is a binding precedent?

A

Must be followed by all lower courts:
In the same court hierarchy as the precedent-setting court
The material facts of the current case need to be similar of those of the precedent-setting case

67
Q

Lesson six

What is an example of a binding precedent?

A

Decision handed down in Grant v Australian Knittinf Mills was binding on all courts in Australia as the decision was made in the High court of Australia

68
Q

Lesson six

What is the persuasive precedent?

A

Does not need to be followed by other courts because the decision was:
Made in either a lower (or equal level) court
Made in a court in another juridisction
The facts of the 2 cases are not necessarily exactly the same (different material facts)
h/w pp. may still be considered relevant and taken into account by judges in other courts in future cases

69
Q

Lesson six

What is an example of a persuasive precedent?

A

Donoghue v Stevenson was not binding on Autralian courts, as it was British case (different jurisdiction / outside of Aus) h/w the decision in that case was taken into consideration in the case of Grant v Australian Knitting Mills. It was t/f persuasive in the development of Australian negligence law

70
Q

Lesson seven

Define jurisdiction

A

The power of a court to hear and determine particular type of case

71
Q

Lesson seven

Define original jurisdiction

A

the types of cases heard in the 1st instance / the case is being heard for the 1st time

72
Q

Lesson seven

Define appellate jurisdiction

A

The types of cases heard on appeal / the case is being reviewed from a lower court

73
Q

Lesson seven

What are the reasons for a court hierarchy?

A

PASTA
P: precedent
A: appeals
S: specialisation
T: time and money
A: administrative convenience

74
Q

Lesson seven

How does the court hierarchy meet the principle of justice, fairness?

A

Each party has the right to an appeal and their case can be reveiwed by a higher court

75
Q

Lesson seven

How does the court hierarchy meet the principle of justice, equality?

A

The doctrine of precedent ensures that decisions are applied in the same way, that way each case is treated similarly
Specialisation means that each case is treated with the experience and knowledge of the law

76
Q

Lesson seven

How does the court hierarchy meet the principle of justice, access?

A

There are magistrates’ courts in various locations around the state. This way, matters can be heard locally.
The distribution of cases amongst different courts also enhance access

77
Q

Lesson eight

What is parliament sovereignty?

A

Parliament is the ultimate law making body, meaning the laws of parliament override the laws of all other law-making bosides, such as courts and subordinate authorities

78
Q

Lesson eight

Relationships between parliament and courts
(abrogation of common law)

A

Sometimes courts will interpret legislation in a way that parliament did not intend when it was written.
A court might also develop common law w/ which the parliament disagrees.
Parliament may also choose to amend the law so that its intention is clearer or est. new law which addresses the common law
When this happens, the precedent set by the statutory interpretation or common law is no longer valid and the courts will need to use the legislation in the next case that is presented.

79
Q

Lesson eight

What is an example of a case which involved the abrogation of common law?

A

Trigwell case when Victorian parliament passed law addressing common law of concern

80
Q

Lesson eight

Relationships between Parliament and courts
(Codification of common law)

A

Sometimes, an issue might present in court that parliament has not considered.
In order to make sure a precedent, w/ which that parliament agrees is not changed in the future, a parliament may choose to codify (or confirm) the precedent by making it legislation
Once codification has occurred, courts are not abe to change the law

81
Q

Lesson eight

What is an example of case which involved the codification of common law?

A

Codification occurred when the Victorian Parliament chose to codify the precedent set in Grant v Australian Knitting Mills by producing the Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic)

82
Q

Lesson eight

Relationships between Parliament and courts
(Ability of courts to influence parliament)

A

Courts can influence parliament through the obiter dictum, a statement of the court made ‘by the way’ can influence parliament to make new laws or amend existing laws

83
Q

Lesson eight

Why might a judge make an obiter dictum?

A

To indicate that a law should be changed by parliament
They think that parliament is in a better position to change the law (e.g. toowide of an area of law)
Parliament can carry out investigations while courts cannot (Royal commissions)

84
Q

Lesson eight

What is an example of a case that involved courts influencing parliament?

A

Trigwell case