Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Legal Studies > civil liability > Flashcards

civil liability Flashcards

1
Q

Lesson one

what is the aim of civil law?

A

the protection of individual rights and restoring individuals to their previous positions if those rights have been infringed by resolving disputes b/w individuals, groups & organisations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Lesson one

what is the aim of the civil law negligence?

A

to ensure that ppl who owe a duty of care to another party do not breach the duty of care; if the duty is breached, the party which committed the breach, will be held accountable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lesson one

what is the aim of the civil law defamation?

A

to enure a person’s reputation is not unjustifiably harmed b/c of false statements that are made about that person; if a reputation is unjustifiably harmed, the party which damaged the reputation will be held accountable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Lesson one

how does civil law meet its aim?

A
  • through establishment of the law through both statute & common law
  • by determining whether the law has been breached
  • through enforcement of the law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Lesson one

what are some areas of civil law?

A
  • tort law
  • contract law
  • family law
  • employment law
  • wills & estates
  • company law
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lesson one

what is a tort?

A
  • a civil wrong.
  • it exists in the absence of a contract b/w the disputing parties
  • e.g. negligence / defamation / nuisance / trespass
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lesson one

which act is the law relating to negligence outlined in?

A

Wrongs Act 1958 (Vic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Lesson one

which act is the law relating to defamation outlined in?

A

Defamation Act 2005 (Vic)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Lesson one

what is contract law?

A

covers the legal validity of a contract (legal agreement) & the rights available to a party if a valid contract is broken
e.g. commercial contracts, employment contracts & building contracts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lesson two

define breach

A

breaking, or failing to fulfill, a duty or obligation
e.g. in a negligence claim, the plaintiff must est that the defendant breached the duty of care owed to them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lesson two

define causation

A

the direct link b/w the actions of the defendant & the harm suffered by the plaintiff; the liability of the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lesson two

how can the casual chain be broken?

A
  • harm was too remote to have been caused by the actions of the defendant –> test = ‘was the damage foreseeable by the defendant?’
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lesson two

what are intervening acts?

A

acts that break the chain of causation meaning that causation cannot be established & the defendant t/f cannot be held liable for the harm suffered by the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Lesson two

define loss

A

a type of harm or damage suffered by a person which can involve both economic & non-economic loss

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lesson two

what are the different types of loss?

A
  • financial loss = loss of wages, loss of earning capacity, loss of profits (contact breach), money spent on medical expenses
  • property damage = car, house, clothing, goods
  • personal injury = cuts, bruises, broken bones, loss of limb
  • pain & suffering = mental anguish, anxiety, depression
  • loss of amenity = enjoyment of life, job satisfation, family life, enjoyment of hobbies
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Lesson two

define limitation of actions?

A

restriction on bringing a civil claim to court after a given time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Lesson two

what is vicarious liability?

A

situation in which a party is deemed responsible for wrongdoing & a breach of rights merely due to an association w/ another party

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Lesson two

what is the burden of proof?

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Lesson four

what does the Limitation of Actions Act 1958 provide?

A

provides the time limits in which a person can make a claim of negligence in Victoria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Lesson four

when must a claim of negligence be commenced?

A
  • w/n 3 yrs of the discovery of the cause of action by the party eligible to claim
    or
  • w/n 12 yrs from the date of the act or omission which resulted in the injury
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Lesson four

what did Donoghue v Stevenson establish?

A

est. the ‘neighbour principle’ in the UK, forming persuasive precedent on Aust. (Grant v Australian Knitting Mills)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Lesson four

what is the ‘neighbour pinciple’?

A

a person must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omssions that are likely to injure their neighbour (person they ought to consider in their actions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Lesson four

what did Grant v Australian Knitting mills establish?

A

est. binding precedent that applied the principles in D v S in Australia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Lesson four

what are the four elements the plaintiff must prove in a negligence claim?

A
  1. duty to care exists
  2. the defendant has breached their duty of care
  3. causation: link b/w breach of duty of care & injury or loss suffered
  4. the plaintiff has suffered a loss as a result of the breach of the duty of care
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Lesson four

when does a legal entity owe a duty of care?

A
  1. the risk was foreseeable (person knew or should have known about risk of harm)
  2. the risk was significant or not significant (not farfetched)
  3. a reasonable person in the same circumstances would have taken precautions to eliminate the risk of harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Lesson four

what are the exceptions to the negligence element duty of care?

A
  • risky recreational activities (participants can sign a waiver acknowledging that they accept responsibility for injuries)
  • ‘good samartians’ are exempt from liability as long as they acted in good faith & w/n their competence
  • voluntary donations of food in good faith
  • volunteers X be held liable as long as they acted in good faith (the organisation can be held liable though)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Lesson four

when is a duty of care breached / broken?

A

when the defendant fails to do what a reasonable person would have done in the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Lesson four

what must the court consider when determining whether a reasonable person would have taken precautions against a risk of harm?

A
  1. the likely risk of harm
  2. the likely seriousness of the harm
  3. the burden of taking precautions to avoid the risk of harm (the effort & cost involved to address the risk)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Lesson four

what is causation in relation to negligence?

A

the direct link b/w the defendant’s breach of duty & the loss suffered by the plaintiff

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Lesson four

what is loss in relation to negligence?

A

it must be proven that the plaintiff suffered loss or damage (even if it is only minor) as a result of a breach of duty of care. the loss or damage can be physical, mental, financial, or damage to property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

lesson three

who are possible plaintiffs to a civil manner?

A
  • the aggrieved party (person who suffered the loss)
  • other victims (X aggrieved party)
  • insurers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Lesson three

who is the aggrieved party?

A

person whose rights have been infringed & who has suffered loss
e.g. in a negligence claim, this will be the person who was owed a duty of acre by the defendant & has suffered harm as a result of the breach

33
Q

Lesson three

what are representative proceedings / class actions?

A
  • 7 or more aggrieved parties
  • aggrieved parties make a claim against the same party which has arisen out of the same circumstances
  • lead plaintiff: represents the group in the proceeding
  • other members = group members
34
Q

Lesson three

who are other victims?

A

those who have indirectly suffered loss or damage as a result of actions of another party may also become a plaintiff by taking legal action

35
Q

Lesson three

what are examples of other victims?

A
  • a family member who suffers loss & damage as a result of the death of a loved one & sues the person or entity they believe caused their family member’s death
  • somebody who was close to or witnessed an event & suffers nervous shock as a result
36
Q

Lesson three

what is the right of subrogation?

A

insurance companies have the right to sue on behalf of the policy holder.
t/f an insurer will pay the policy holder & then sue the person who caused the loss to recover their expenses

37
Q

Lesson three

who are possible defendants to a civil claim

A
  • the wrongdoer
  • employers
  • persons involved in wrongdoings (accessories)
  • insuers
  • organisations / companies
  • the government & government agencies
38
Q

Lesson three

define vicarious liability

A

the legal responsibility of a 3rd party for the wrongful acts of another
e.g. employers can be vicariously liable for the actions of their employees

39
Q

Lesson seven

what are the impacts of negligence on the plaintiff?

A
  • loss of life: e.g. a workplace accident / care accident can result in death
  • permanent physical incapcity: the plaintiff might require carers for the remainder of their life
  • serious physical injury: the need for medical expenses, such as operations & ongoing care
  • loss of wages & livelihood: being out of work for the duration of the recovery
  • unemployment: might be as a consequence of physical or mental injury
  • effect on mental health: depression, anxiety, loss of self-esteem
40
Q

Lesson seven

what is the impact of negligence the defendant?

A
  • loss of business: potentially due to the negative publicity associated with the negligence claim
  • public humiliation & loss of reputation: again, this can stem from the negative publicity of the claim
  • physical injury: in cases of contributory negligence, the defendant might also suffer injury, sych as in car accident; a counterclaim can aso be launched by a defendant
  • costs: if the defendant loses the case, the prospect of paying some of the plaintiff’s legal costs exists
  • need to sell assests: this will potentially results from a high award of damages against the defendant
41
Q

Lesson seven

what are the impacts of negligence on society

A
  • social impact: burden on families, health system, psychological services, workplaces
  • psychological impact: a potential loss of faith in individuals & institutions
  • impact on the legal sysem: delays, costs, backlogs, pressure
42
Q

Lesson three

who is a wrongdoer?

A

the person or company that has directly caused the loss or damage to the plaintiff (may be more than one)
e.g. in medical neg. claim, plaintiff may sue both hospital & doctor

43
Q

Lesson three

who is a person involved in wrongdoing?

A

party held liable as an accessory, known as accessorial liability

44
Q

Lesson three

what is accessorial liability

A
  • anyone who aided, abetted or procured the wrongdoing
  • induced or encouraged wrongdoing
  • conspired w/ others to cause the wrongdoing
45
Q

Lesson five

what are the defences to a negligence claim?

A
  • lack of elements
  • specific defence (voluntary assumption of risk / contributory negligence / illegality)
46
Q

Lesson five

when is the defence lack of elements used?

A

used when the defendant claims that not all the elements of negligence are present, X duty of care, duty of care X breached, X loss or harm occurred or if so it was caused by other means

47
Q

Lesson five

what does it mean for ‘no duty of care was owed’?

A

the defendant may claim that there was no ‘neighbour relationship’ b/c it was not reasonable to foresee that their actions would cause the loss or damage that the plaintiff suffered

48
Q

Lesson five

what does it mean for ‘the duty of care was not breached’?

A

a duty of care is not breached if the defendant acted as any reasonable person would have & the injury was the result of an accident & could not be stopped i.e. the injury or harm was not forseeable

49
Q

Lesson five

what does it mean for ‘no loss or harm occurred or if so, it was caused by other means’?

A

the defendant claims that although they may have breached their duty or care the plaintiff suffered no harm or the harm / injury was not the result of the breach

50
Q

Lesson five

what must the defendant demonstrate for the specific defence voluntary assumption of risk?

A
  • was fully aware of the risk;
  • fully appreciated its nature & extent; &
  • freely & willingly accepted the risk
51
Q

Lesson five

what are examples of situations where the defence voluntray assumption of risk may be applied?

A
  • Bungee jumping or sky diving
  • knowlingly & voluntarily accpeting a lift w/ a drunk driver
  • cases involving sports ppl: jockeys; boxers
52
Q

Lesson five

what does the specific defence voluntary assumption of risk NOT apply to?

A

NOT apply to professional services. that is, negligence claims can be bought against professionals that have specialised skills such as financial advisors, accountants, lawyers, surveyors

53
Q

Lesson five

what is the specific defence contributory negligence?

A
  • the plaintiff has contributed to the harm caused by the defendant
    i.e. the plaintiff as contributed to their own negligence
  • reduces the amount of damages owed to the plaintiff if the defendant is hled liable
54
Q

Lesson five

A

the plaintiff failed to take the standard of care a person should to ensure their own safety, thereby contributing to their own negligence.

55
Q

Lesson eight

why does the tort of defamation exist?

A

exists to protect the reputation of individuals against unjustified attempts to descredit their character in the eyes of others in the community

56
Q

Lesson eight

historically, what were the two catergories of defamation under common law?

A
  • Libel
  • slander
57
Q

Lesson eight

what is libel?

A

statement made in permanent form (newspaper, radio, television, emial) that lowers that person’s reputation

58
Q

Lesson eight

what is slander?

A

statement made in non-permanent form, word-of-mouth

59
Q

Lesson eight

what is the relevant act that the tort of defamation covers both libel & slander?

A

the Defamation Act 2005 (VIC)

60
Q

Lesson eight

what needs to be proven by the plaintiff for a defamation claim to be successful in court?

A
  1. the statement was defamatory
  2. the statement identified the plaintiff
  3. publication of the defamatory statement
61
Q

Lesso eight

what does it mean for a statement to be defamatory?

A

a defamatory statement lowers a person’s reputation or standing in the community exposing them to ridicule or hatred

62
Q

Lesson eight

what does it mean for the defamatory statement to refer to identify the plaintiff

A
  • the person defamed need not be mentioned by name
  • sufficient to prove that ppl reading the statement would reasonably conclude that it was about the plaintiff
  • plaintiff may also be defamaed as part of a group (groups has to be specifically addressed)
63
Q

Lesson eight

what does it mean by the publication of a defamatory statement

A

the written or verbal statement was published (communicated to a person other than the person to which it referred) by the defendant.
X matter whether material published to general public or to a small group

64
Q

Lesson nine

when being sued for defamation, what can the defendant claim in defence?

A
  • not all elements of defamation were satisfied by the plaintiff (lack of elements)
  • the limitation of factions has expired (1 yr)
  • specific defence
65
Q

Lesson nine

what are the specific defences associated with defamation?

A
  • justification
  • honest opinion
  • absolute privilege
  • qualified privilege
  • contextural truth
  • fair report of proceedings of public concern
  • triviality
  • innocent dissemination
66
Q

Lesson nine

what is the specific defence, justification?

A
  • prove that def statement i true & that they were t/f justified in makingg the statement
  • t/f demonstrate that no unjustified damage to the plaintiff’s reputation occurred
67
Q

Lesson nine

what is the specific defence honest opinion?

A
  • defendant claim def material is an expression of their opinion as a commentator.
  • the matter must be of public interest & the opinion must be based on proper material
  • the statement cannot be grossly exaggerated or go beyond what would reasonably be expected of a critic.
68
Q

Lesson nine

when is the specific defence absoluet privilege used?

A
  • when the defamatory statement is made in parliament, courts or tribunals
69
Q

Lesson nine

who does parliamentary privilege protect?

A

protects those who participate in “proceedings in parliament” from outside interference or suit

70
Q

lesson nine

where does the specific defence qualified privilege used?

A

used where the defendant:
- believes the recipient of the defamatory information has a moral or legal interest in receiving the information
- acts w/o malice or spite
- acts reasonably in the circumstances
e.g. - parent / teacher

71
Q

Lesson nine

when does the specific defence contextual truth apply?

A
  • applies when a defamatory statement is substantially true although there might be some inaccuracies
  • the core issue of the publication is true
72
Q

Lesson nine

what does the defendant argue for the specific defence, fair report of proceedings of public concern

A

defendant argue that the material was a fair report of proceedings published for the public or for educational purposes

73
Q

Lesson nine

what is the specific defence triviality?

A
  • defendant argue that the plaintiff was unlikely to suffer harm due to the statement
  • the matter is a minor matter & trivial in nature
74
Q

Lesson nine

who does the specific defence innocent dissemination protect?

A
  • defence protects ppl who unknowlingly distribute defamatory information
75
Q

Lesson nine

what must the defendant prove for the specific defence of innocent dissemination?

A

must prove that they did not know that the publication contained defamatory information & that they did not have an obligation to check for defamatory material

76
Q

Lesson nine

what is an example of the specific defence, innocent dissemination?

A
  • printing companies,
  • bookseller
77
Q

Lesson ten

what is the impact of defamation on the plaintiff?

A
  • loss of reputation: loss of status e.g. shunned by ppl who once respected them
  • emotional impact: a consequence of the publicity of the claim e.g. developing anxiety, depression
  • loss of wages & livelihood: e.g. the plaintiff might need to take time off work for proceedings
  • unemployment: consequences of loss of repuation
  • legal costs / fees
78
Q

Lesson ten

what is the impact of defamation on the defendant?

A
  • costs: need to pay legal fees of the plaintiff if the defendant loses the case. even if successful defendant need to pay some of their own fees if the hearing is over a long period of time & costs exceed standard costs
  • need to sell assests: potential consequence of a high award for damages or high legal fees
  • public humiliation: consequence of the publicity of the claim

Legal Studies (9 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions