left and right realism Flashcards
multiple aetiology
crime as the result of many factors interacting with each other.
no single factor is to blame and crime is the result of a mixture of informal and formal social control, structural inequalities and the agency of the offender,
why ‘realist’? what is it about?
- practical views of C and D and looking for solutions to reduce crime
- they both see it as real and a major problem, esp for victims
- they react to labelling theory and radical criminology by saying that these don’t show concern for the real victim who suffers the impacts of crime
what are Lea and Young’s three key factors influencing the levels of crime?
- relative deprivation
- marginalisation
- subculture
left vs right realism- what is the difference
LEFT: emphasise the importance of tackling poverty and deprivation- looking for the cause
RIGHT: emphasis on zero tolerance policy and punishing the criminal
- relative deprivation
- a level of deprivation where some people feel like they don’t have the same level of economic resources relative to others.
- crime rates are higher among those within the lower social and economic strata of society
- pressures of media to achieve economic success and social goals leaves people feeling deprived in relation to others
- need for parity w others lead to deviation and crime
- explains white collar crimes too
- subcultures (Lea and Young)
- collectivist values of subcultures provide relief from relative deprivation (in it together)
- award people status within the group via small crimes (disorganised or street crime)
- male black youth is closely enmeshed in values of consumption, style and wealth, so they engage in crime because of blocked opportunities to have these.
- marginalisation (Lea and Young)
- frustration from being alienated from society leads people to find a group of similar people they DO fit in with = subculture
- marginalised groups have minimal representation in society, being rejected by it
- they express their frustration at this through violent and aggressive means
- powerful institutions create this marginalisation that makes groups feel left out or left behind
Evaluations of Lea and Young (tutor 2u vid)
Lea and Young main points (notes)
- statistics often reflect typical criminals (young wc disproportionately black)
- focus on victims AND offenders, crime is concentrated in urban areas + ‘sink housing’ estates
- do not approve of use of statistics to create fear and moral panic.
- they blame the broken system not the criminal- limited life choices
- Jock Young, John Lea, Roger Matthews and Richard Kinsey
- critical of perspectives that see longer sentences and more prisons as a solution
the perry school project
- 2y intellectual enrichment for disadvantaged black kids aged 3-4 = by age 40 crime rates were lowered and there were higher school graduation rates
- identifying groups at risk of offending, trying to limit that risk via intervention
- for every $1 spent, $17 were saved on welfare, prison etc
the square of crime
state
- the way it’s policed has effect
- military style plicing
- petty crimes focused on rather than wider focus impacts ppl.
offender
- why do they?
- what rules govern their behaviour?
- impact on society?
informal control (soc welfare/infastructure)
- sense of community
- better job prospects
- better housing
victim
- why are they likely to be victims
what solutions are suggested by left realists?
- better community relations- ppl and policies
- less deprivation (poverty down and legit opportunities)
- more opportunities to build bonds of attachment
what are the main ideas of right realists?
- seek PRACTICAL crime CONTROL measures- worry less about finding the causes and more about controlling it
- labelling and critical criminologists excuse criminal behaviour too much with reference to police labelling/ poverty/ capitalism etc
James Q Wilson (1975) and poverty
he notes that in the 1960s in the US anti-poverty programmes were also accompanied by enormous crime increases?
Ron Clarke and poverty
crime rates have risen in the UK since 1945 despite the avg income also rising