Lee et al. (1997) Flashcards

1
Q

What is meant by the term ‘moral development?

A

How children begin to construct a system of beliefs about how we interact with others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is meant by the term ‘individualist cultures’?

A

Focus is on the interest of the individual (western cultures mainly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is meant by the term ‘collectivist cultures’?

A

Focus is on the needs of the group (eastern cultures mainly)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is mean by the term ‘self-aggrandisement’?

A

Bragging about personal achievements (e.g. high marks and good deeds)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is meant by the term ‘self-effacement’?

A

Not making yourself noticeable/not trying to make yourself noticed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 main aims of Lee’s study?

A
  • To investigate if there’s a difference between Canadian children and Chinese children in how they evaluate lying and truth-telling
  • To see if Chinese and Canadian children would rate truth and lie telling differently in a pro-social setting (good deed), whereas they would rate it similarly in an anti-social setting (mis-deed)
  • To investigate if this changes with age (between 7-11 years old)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Outline the Chinese side of the sample.

A
  • 120 Chinese children
  • 40 of each age (7, 9 and 11 years old)
  • All from same city - Hangzhai in China
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Outline the Canadian side of the sample.

A
  • 108 Canadian children
  • 36 7 year olds, 40 9 year olds and 32 11 year olds
  • All from New Brunswich
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What experimental design was used in this study?

A

Independent measures used both in terms of ethnicity of the child and condition they were placed in.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are the 4 conditions of this study?

A
  • Ethnicity of child
  • Age of child (7, 9 or 11)
  • Type of story (social or physical)
  • Pro-social or anti-social settings
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What 4 types of stories were used for the 4 conditions?

A
  • Pro-social truth-telling (physical and social) stories
  • Pro-social lie-telling (physical and social) stories
  • Anti-social truth-telling (physical and social) stories
  • Anti-social lie-telling (physical and social) stories
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Give an example of a pro-social truth-telling physical story.

A

Jenny cleans out the school yard, and teacher asks Jenny ‘Do you know who cleaned the yard?’. Jenny replies ‘I did it.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Outline the procedure of the study.

A
  • Children tested individually
  • Child would listen to either 4 social stories or 4 physical stories (randomly allocated)
  • During each story, child read first half and then asked ‘Was what ***** did good or naughty?’
  • Child responds to this question using a 7-point rating scale
  • Child then read second half of story, and use the same rating scale to answer a second question (same as before)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What were the overall results of the study?

A
  • No significant difference in the order which stories were given
  • No significant difference between genders
  • Both cultures always saw good deeds as good and bad deeds as bad
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What were the results of the pro-social truth-telling stories?

A
  • All ages of Canadian children similarly rated truth-telling
  • As Chinese children got older, the less positively they rated truth-telling in pro-social situations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What were the results of the pro-social lie-telling stories?

A
  • Canadian children rated lie-telling negatively in pro-social situations
  • Chinese children rate lie-telling negatively at age 7 but positively as age 11
17
Q

What were the results of the anti-social truth-telling stories?

A

-Both cultures rated truth-telling in the anti-social situation as positive

18
Q

What were the results of the anti-social lie-telling stories?

A

-Reactions to lie-telling in a bad situation changed based on age for both cultures (more negative as children aged)

19
Q

What did the Chinese children say when asked about why they rated pro-social truth-telling negatively?

A

They said the child was “begging for” or “wanting” praise.

One third of the Chinese children said you shouldn’t leave your name after doing a good deed.

20
Q

What is the main conclusion of this study?

A

Main conclusion is that moral development is different in different cultures as a result of socio-cultural norms and practices.