Lectures Final Flashcards
Greta Thunberg general info and clinical diagnoses
- teenage climate activist from Sweden
- Aperger’s syndrome (mild autism)
- Depression (common in mild ASD)
- OCD behaviours
- Anorexia nervosa
- Selective mutism
- mom opera singer, dad filmmaker
- younger sister has ADHD
Greta’s personality in the “How Dare You” video
- passionate, intense, accusatory, apocalyptic
- social dominance
- doesn’t care ab empathizing w leaders (maybe low A)
Greta’s personality in the Montreal Climate March speech
- warmer, less intense, urgency instead of accusatory
- builds connection w audience using humor (can be highly agreeable!)
Greta Thunberg Big 5
- high on social dominance facet of E
- can show high A (circumstantial)
- high C
- low N
- unsure about O
Heritability of ASD
90%
In 2019, _____/80ppl have ASD diagnosis
1/80
Examples of people with aspergers
- maybe Bill Gates
- guy Koestner knew in HS (obsesses w subway system)
- many profs might have ASD
- kid at National Park who knew more than the ranger
AQ (+ items relate to…..)
- Autism-Spectrum Quotient
- normal distribution, everyone is somewhere on scale
- items relate to empathizing vs. systematizing
Baron-Cohen study of AQ and NEO-PI-R
- wanted to know if autism traits were an independent personality dimension
- found that autism is independent trait
- students w ASD are lower on E (esp. gregariousness)
- higher on N (esp. depression and self consciousness)
- lower C (get caught-up or sidetracked)
Smith et al. Meta-analysis of Big 5 and ASD
- questionnaire method, also collected questionnaires from parents
- meta-analysis, quantitative review
- Pearson correlations all significant
- all 5 traits on less socially desirable end
- found that when a kid with ASD has more socially desirable scores (esp. E), they’re more likely to shed diagnosis later in life
Big 5 traits in depression and anxiety
- lower E
- lower C
- higher N
Big 5 traits and substance abuse disorders
- low A
- E not associated
3 levels of personality
- Big 5 traits
- personal concerns (motivational and developmental; greta best understood at level 2 - as an agent)
- life narrative
Achievement motivation
- like to master tasks, develop skills, improve
- like moderate challenge, responsibility, feedback
- small business owners, lawyers, research scientist, salespeople, maybe doctors
Affiliation motivation
- preoccupied and interested in social relationships
- counsellors, mediators
Power motivation
- wanting to have impact and influence
- Greta very high on this
- managers, clergy
Lifetime prevalence of depressive disorders
17%
Lifetime prevalence of anxiety disorders
29%
Lifetime prevalence of substance use disorders
35%
Age of onset of McAdams layers of personality
- Actor: birth
- Agent: 6y
- Author: 16y
Greta Thunberg stage 2 (Agent)
- high power motivation
- seems like Greta skipped to Generativity stage (concern that she is her parents’ puppet and is therefore foreclosed)
- life story is kinda messianic (“I’m gonna save the world”)
Erikson’s 8 Stages of Psychosocial Development
0-18mo: Trust vs. Mistrust
18mo-3t: Autonomy vs. Shame and Doubt
3-5y: Initiative vs. Guilt
5-13y: Industry (competence) vs. Inferiority
13-21y: Identity vs. Role confusion (need to explore and make commitments)
21-39y: Intimacy vs. Isolation
40-65y: Generativity vs. Stagnation
65y+: Ego integrity vs. Despair
According to David McClelland, what is the first and most important thing to consider when thinking about someone’s personality?
Motives!
We feel best about ourselves and our lives when the important goals we are pursuing are _______
…more related to the motive we’re highest on
Ordinary People movie trailer
- boy who tried to commit suicide after brother dies
- forced to go to therapy
- wants to feel more ‘in control’
Why didn’t Koestner become a clinician
- right trait (A), right schema, right values
- not right motive
- low social vitality was a problem
- because he can’t ask open-ended questions
McClelland’s arguments against theory that “personality doesn’t matter that much”
- need to look at variance accounted for by groups of traits, not just one
- personality accounts for more of life outcomes when you look at it more broadly!
- multiple correlation comes out at .5 or .6 (vs .2 for one trait)
Koestner study on CEGEP students and STEM path
- for children of immigrants, only way to get out of doing science was being really bad at it
Trait profile to succeed as a clinician (and enjoy doing it!)
- intimacy/affiliation motivation
- power motivation (having an impact)
- agreeableness (therapeutic alliance)
- social vitality part of E
- it’s okay to be neurotic
- high on Universalism and Benevolence values
- schema: optimism or positive expectancies
- interpersonal emotional skills (like test w pictures of eyes where you have to identify the emotion)
4 categories of fundamental values
- Self-Transcendence
- Conservation
- Self-Enhancement
- Openness to Change
Fundamental values: Self-Transcendence
- universalism
- benevolence
Fundamental values: Conservation
- conformity
- tradition
- security
Fundamental values: Self-Enhancement
- achievement
- power
- hedonism (also goes into openness)
Fundamental values: Openness to Change
- hedonism (also goes into self-enhancement)
- stimulation
- self-direction
10 fundamental values
Self-Transcendence
- Universalism
- Benevolence
Conservation
- Conformity
- Tradition
- Security
Self-Enhancement
- Achievement
- Power
- Hedonism (also goes into Openness)
Openness to Change
- Stimulation
- Self-Direction
Koestner’s top fundamental values
- benevolence and universalism (self-transcendence)
Fundamental values scale
(culture? politics?)
- 50 item quiz
- 10 fundamental values found through factor analysis
- same across cultures
- highly predictive of political positions
Schemas (and what schemas did McClelland focus on?)
- beliefs or worldviews
- McClelland focussed on optimism and positive expectancies
- locus of control: you think there will be a relation between your behavior and outcomes
Picture Story exercise
- way to assess motives
- show people an everyday scene and ask them to tell a story with a beginning, middle, and end
- code for thematic content in 6 stories
- no correlation with how people describe themselves on traits
- no correlation w self-reports
- if you ask for 10 goals/strivings r is about .4 (in Koestner’s studies he only asks for 4 stories)
- implicit motives more predictive of career success
People high on power motivation are more likely to be leaders if they’re also ______ on the trait of _______
HIGH on the trait of SOCIAL ASSERTIVENESS
Motives tell us ____ a person does what they do. Traits tell us _____ they do it.
WHY, HOW
German study on sports participation and motives
- recruited ppl who like team sports (sports are achievement rich)
- undergrads, community adults, tennis pros
- assessed implicit and self-reported achievement at beginning of season
- only implicit motive predicted time spent doing sport
According to Koestner, we need to find a career path that fits at least _____ of our ____, ____, ____, ____ and____.
…at least 3 of our motives, traits, skills, schemas and values.
Obama and Trump are both high on which kind of motivation
Power!
The positive side of high power motivation
- joining volunteer organizations
- being an effective leader
- liking being associated w symbols of prestige
The negative side of high power motivation
- more likely to get into fights, drink to excess, be exploitative in their relationships
- unhappy marriages/divorce (often bc of infidelity)
- selfish behaviors
- linked to lower SES
- linked to poor activity inhibition (mitigating impulses
- more common for men (obvi) BUT if they get responsibility training they don’t show this maladaptive power motivation
Story about high power motivation and Koestner’s daughter’s school
- mom took action bc school had terrible crossing guard, eventually had whole intersection redone
- same mom organized to replace bad science teacher, planned a big school dance
Affiliation vs. Intimacy motive
- affiliative motive is worry ab others liking you
- if you’re low on this you’re a better leader bc you can delegate, tell ppl what to do
Motivational profile of a good leader
- high nPow
- low nAff
- high activity inhibition
Michael Scott motive profile
- very high nAff (bad for leaders)
- very low capacity for inhibition (bad leader)
- might be high on nAch
Study on leadership motive profile at AT&T and the Navy
- all men
- longitudinal study over 20y
- 25% of leaders had profile
- they were the ones who moved up executive ladder!
Obama motive profile
- highest nPow vs 6 other democratic candidates
- moderate nAch, low nAff
- high activity inhibition
- he has the right profile but low E might have limited his success
David Winter’s scoring system for coding speech
- you can code the speeches of politicians and identify their motives and level of activity inhibition
- codes strong vigorous actions that try to impact others, actions that directly arouse strong emotional states, and concern for reputation/prestige
- higher nPow associated w higher success as President
David Winters channeling hypothesis
- traits channel and direct the way motives are expressed
- might need requisite level of E to work towards our goals
- worried Obama was too introverted to be a good President (low E can inhibit expression of nPow) (introversion inhibition hypothesis)
Winter study of Radcliffe women
- women’s Harvard
- measured motives and if they had high-impact careers
- for extraverts, high nPow meant high-impact career
- in introverts nPow not expressed clearly
Trump motive profile
- high nPow
- high nAch
- high nAff
- no activity inhibition
- kinda like Michael Scott, will say what audience wants to hear (even if they’re racists)
- does NOT have socialized form of nPow
- leads to divisiveness of country and corruption
Zelensky’s motive profile
- stood up to Trump blackmailing him (we will give you missiles if you say Joe Biden’s son is under investigation in the Ukraine)
- gave lots of really inspiring speeches
- did improv/acting, probably high in nPow
- does have good leadership profile
- AND moral courage!
The people who are most likely to struggle with identity are _____
young adults! (not middle aged people)
Erikson’s Psychosocial Stages general info
- reformulation of Freud’s theories
- each stage is a social task/challenge to be resolved
- identity is the critical stage
Erikson’s 8 stages
- Trust (0-1y)
- Autonomy (2-3y): become willful; important how parents negotiate allowing autonomy but also having some structure
- Initiative (4-5y): autonomy goes further
- Industry (6-16ish): are we good? (skills and morals)
- Identity (16-22++): question self and future
- Intimacy (YA)
- Generativity (midlife): leaving a mark
- Integrity (old age): was life worth living
Koestner’s identity crisis at age 18
- knew his identity wasn’t forming well so wanted to move away for uni
- got a scholarship to Colgate, but mom asked him to stay so he went to Columbia
- hated it; had to work bc less scholarship money
- worked at Macy’s in basement food emporium
- made friends but they all wanted to help change him
- Alex: said he couldn’t listen to broadway anymore, made him a playlist of cool music
- Margaret Feeny: asked to go shopping with him (he dressed like Dwight); so he started buying his own clothes
- John Rivera: tough, confident; brought Rich to Taekwando class, he hated the class and hid his Gee (white outfit) in his desk
- mom found Gee a year later and thought he was joining the Moonies (cult religion famous for brainwashing and giant marriage ceremonies)
- if your parents think you’d fall for something like this, it’s likely you haven’t figured out your identity
- moved away so he could develop an identity
James Marcia and identity status assessment
- developed way to see what status young people have achieved
- identity is 2 steps: exploring and making commitments
- set of semi-structured Qs allow trained individual to judge whether a young adult has achieved a clear identity or not
Identity Achievement
- 21%
- exploration and commitment
- trust themselves, able to explain their choices, view parents in balanced way
Identity diffusion
- 24%
- no exploration, no commitment
- isolated, alienated, not highly motivated
- no attachment to parents
- engage in a lot of fantasy/withdrawal
Moratorium
- 27%
- exploring but not making commitments
- preoccupied and struggling, marked ambivalence toward parents
- higher N, lower social confidence/assertiveness
Foreclosure
- 28%
- no exploring but made a commitment
- often bc of family
- goal-directed, very close to family, choose similar friends, self-confident
- if life events disrupt stability they struggle to recover
Vulnerability of those who are diffused or foreclosed
- don’t handle stress well
- difficulty with intimacy
Criticisms of Marcia and Erikson
- not all of us grow up in families where we’re encouraged to explore
- they would say there’s a psychological cost to that and many will end up foreclosed
Hikikomori
- occurs in Japan in later years of HS (esp boys)
- socially withdraw and live in their room
- 1-2% of adolescents in Japan
- identity diffusion!
Example of family friend who was foreclosed
- wanted to be a doctor
- didn’t get into med school
- applied again after undergrad, only got in in Greece
- spent 3y there, got an internship
- didn’t go well, got kicked out of school
- a year later still struggling and doesn’t know what to do
Spiderman and identity status
- probably foreclosed
- wanted to be a scientist, getting powers challenged this, he went into a depression
Study on self-esteem and identity status
- made students take ambiguous test, gave fake feedback (either 40th percentile or 90th)
- in achieved and moratorium, self esteem wasn’t too affected
- foreclosed and diffuse swung wildly based on feedback
Intimacy status (what it is + 4 categories)
- depth of relationships; commitment
- isolate: no depth, no commitment (Sheldon Cooper before he met Leonard)
- stereotyped: lot of relationships but no depth (Seinfeld characters)
- pre-intimate: some depth but no commitment to a single partner (FRIENDS)
- intimate: commitment and mutuality (Jim and Pam)
Generativity definition
- adult’s concern for and commitment to the well-being of youth and future generations
- spans from 35-70
- non generative individuals experience self-absorption, stagnation, and impoverished interpersonal relations
- dynamic tension between generativity and stagnation!
Virtues/strengths we get from resolving Erikson’s stages
- Trust – hope
- Autonomy – will
- Initiative – purpose
- Industry – competence and self-esteem
- Identity – fidelity
- Intimacy – love
- Generativity – care
- Integrity – wisdom
Study on identity status and intimacy status
- at higher levels of identity status, more likely to have higher level of intimacy status
- low levels also highly correlated