Lectures 6-15 Flashcards

1
Q

Sometimes an instrumental procedure is employed however the animal learns a CS-US association. What is this called, and what is occuring?

A

Implicit classical - when animal learns that leaver is a stimulus that gets food. so animal will bite on leaver, and therefore food is delivered. Looks like instrumental conditioning but the rat is just learning the relationship between the leaver and food.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Describe the test used to determine if an instrumental response or CS-US association is learned.

A

Omission test - does the conditioned response persist even when it prevents or delays access to a positive US. IF it persists, then Classical conditioning, if the response stops this means that the animal has learnt that their behaviour controls the outcome, therefore instrumental learning has occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Can conditioning occur when you prevent the UR

A

Yes, e.g. if you give a dog a drug which prevents salvation, it will still condition. i.e. when drug wears off will get salvation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Give an example of S-S learning and S-R learning. Is the distinction between these absolute? why or why not? How does this effect the rate at which a US is devalued.

A
S-S = bell associated with food
S-R = bell associated with salivation 

The distinction is not absolute as we can think of a stimulus as having multiple levels of experience. The animal can associate the CS with any type of process going on in the animals brain - depending on how early in the sequence the association is formed.

If the association forms up the top (S-S), then you will see a devaluation effect happen fast, however if the association forms with the response (S-R), then devaluation of US won’t effect response.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Describe the ratio that describes the rate of conditioning.

A

(US-US)/(CS-US) = interval between US’s/CS duration

conditioning occurs the fastest when ratio is larger
so greater conditioning when trials are far apart, and CS-US are paired closely*

*but very short CS-US intervals reduces conditioning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Is continuity enough? explain your answer.

A

No - Rescorla’s truly random schedule - demonstrates that even when you have continuity, don’t get conditioning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Describe overshadowing

A

If A and B were individually paired with a US, and C+D were paired together with an US you would find greater conditioning when test A and B than C and D. C and D overshadowed each other and resulted in less learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Describe Blocking

A

Blocking is a phenomena originally described by Kamin, where pre-training of a cue (CS-US) impairs subsequent learning about another cue in a cue compound with the pre-trained cue. In a blocking paradigm, responding to cue B in a reinforced stimulus compound, AB, is reduced due to pre-training of cue A.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is continuity necessary for learning. Explain your answer.

A

No! Rats learn about a CS associated with no US - inhibitory conditioning. e.g. leanring that a noise is a safety signal.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Is contingency necessary for learning?

A

No! e.g. when shock is sometimes presented with a noise - no conditioning to the noise, but conditioning/learning about the chamber. they are learning that the chamber is frightening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Can the RW model explain Rescorla’s original demonstration of contingency (i.e. Rescora’s truly random schedule = no conditioning to the CS)?

A

Yes, extra CSs delivered are associated with the context, this blocks learning about the original CS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How does the RW model explain extinction? What does this suggest?

A

Lambda = 0 since no US, sigma V > 0 since the CS has already acquired an associative strength, usually 1. Therefore 0-1=-1, V decreases, gradual reduction to 0. This suggests that extinction is unlearning, which we know is not true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

If extinction is not unlearning, what is extinction?

A

Extinction is new learning about the CS that masks the original learning. The animal acquires memories of the CS:
- after conditioning, only memory is CS-US association
- after extinction, animal have two different conflicting memories. memory of CS-US and memory of CS alone.
CR is determined by which type of memory received upon testing. If an animal has recent and extreme experience with the Cs alone, then does not show CR to CS (ie. extinction)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How is extinction influenced by the context.

A

The animal uses the environment to tell it which type of memory it should be retrieving. Extinction now means the CS is ambiguous, the way you can resolve this is you encapsulate that ambiguity with the context. therefore renewal of CRs if animal is tested in different context and spontaneous recovery of CRs over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Describe what is meant by extinction as inhibition

A

This describes the notion that extinction is a CS-noUS memory, which is essentially inhibitory learning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Describe the two tests for inhibition

A
  1. Summation test: S reduces responding to another CS

2. retardation test: subsequent learning of S-US association is impaired (since was previously negatively correlated)

17
Q

How is inhibition described in the RW model.

A

If A is paired with X (a conditioned inhibitor), A+X = noUS.
VA = 1-alpha beta - decease in elarning, but positive learning, VX = 0-alphabeta - negative learning.

18
Q

What are some errors that the RW model make in terms of conditioned inhibition?

A

Predicts that when an inhibitory CS is presented in its own, it results in extinction of inhibition - which is incorrect.

19
Q

Describe LI. Can the RW model describe LI?

A

Exposure to a CS without the US impairs later learning about a CS-US association.

no! RW model can’t describe LI as it since lambda = 0, and sigma V = 0, error term is 0 - predicting no learning, which isn’t true.

20
Q

How are LI and extinction similar? How are they different?

A
  • They are procedurally the flipside of each other:
    LI: CS- / CS+US / CS?
    EXT: CS+US / CS- / CS?
  • in each case you see less responding to the CS
  • both are failures to retrieve CS-US memory due to interference from CS-alone memory
  • both context specific
  • loss of LI overtime, and loss of extinction (spontaneous recovery)

BUT..

Recall extinction = inhibitory learning. So if LI = extinction, then LI = inhibitory learning. BUT

  • a pre-exposed/latently inhibited stimulus does not reduce the CR to another CS (fails summation test)
  • pre-exposure(LI) results in retarded inhibitory conditioning - see slow learning about CS as safety signal. So if LI retards inhibitory learning, then clearly different phenomena.
21
Q

Describe the link between LI in humans and schizophrenia

A

LI is absent or weaker in people with schizophrenia - they are not selective enough. So they attend to cues even when they don’t predict anything, like a pre-trained cue. So they are not vulnerable to LI.

22
Q

What are the 3 forms of social learning?

A
  1. imitation
  2. local enhancement/stimulus enhancement
  3. observational learning
23
Q

What is the difference between the single action test and two action test of imitation? Why is a two action test better?

A

In the single action test, an observer watches while a demonstrator performs an instrumental response however in a two action test the observer watches while demonstrator solves a task in one of two ways. in a single action test if the observer performs the response then it is considered imitation, and for a two action test if the observer follows the same method as the demonstrator, it is considered imitation.

A two action test is better as it controls for phenomenon like stimulus enhancement and social transmission.

24
Q

Describe the criteria for pedagogy.

A
  1. Teacher must modify his or her behavior in presence of naive observer. i.e. teacher must thave some intention and understanding of what the student knows and doesn’t know.
  2. Must be some sort of cost to the teacher
  3. student must benefit from the interaction
25
Q

what are some examples of cases that are not pedagogy.

A

observational learning
parents disciplining young
parents cutting up child’s food
parents engaging in baby talk