LECTURES 1-6 Flashcards
LAW OF EFFECT
“When a modifiable neural connection is made and is accompanied by a satisfying state of affairs, the strength of the connection is increased. If the connection is made and is followed by an annoying state of affairs, its strength is decreased.”
POSITIVE REINFORCEMENT
Presentation of a favourable consequence following a response, leading to a increase in behaviour frequency
NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT
Removal of an aversive event following a response leading to an increase in behaviour frequency
POSITIVE PUNISHMENT
Presentation of an unfavourable consequence following an event leading to reduction in behaviour frequency
NEGATIVE PUNISHMENT
Removal of appetitive event following a response leading to reduction in behaviour frequency
OPERANT CONDITIONING
Response - consequence learning
Results in a change in behaviour due to the relation between behaviour and consequence
THREE TERM CONTINGENCY
Antecedent –> Behaviour –> Consequence
- The discriminated operant
ADVENTITIOUS REINFORCEMENT
Accidental or chance pairings between a response and reinforcement
SUPERSTITIOUS BEHAVIOUR
The animal will behave as if the response has the causal effect of producing reinforcement
SKINNER (1948)
Periodic food presentations produced repeated behaviour that differed across pigeons
NEURINGER 1 (1970)
Response-dependent followed by response-independent food produced sustained responding
EXTINCTION
No reinforcers provided for any response, designed to avoid any new learning.
BRUNER & REVUSKY (1961)
Non-exclusive responding with one response-dependent option among inactive options
ANTECEDENT STIMULI
Things in the environment that suggest what behaviours will be likely to result in reinforcement
Stimuli that are present immediately before or during the behaviour
MORSE AND SKINNER (1957)
Proved superstitious stimulus control