Lectures 1, 2, 3-Neuroscience cognitive Flashcards
Pictures will be in Gradescope, exam Tuesday.
What is the course overview:(4 categories)
Definition: Cognitive neuroscience explores how the brain enables the human mind, supporting thought and behavior.
Key Topics Covered:
Vision – How the brain processes visual information.
Memory – Neural mechanisms behind storing and recalling information.
Movement – Brain control over voluntary and involuntary actions.
Cognitive Control – Executive functions like decision-making and attention.
Course Focus:
Current Understanding – Overview of major findings in cognitive neuroscience.
Research Methods – Tools used to study the neural basis of cognition (e.g., fMRI, EEG, lesion studies)
What are the goals of this course?
The goals of the course are to prepare you to:
1. Describe the key computational challenges or problems that the brain must solve in the cognitive
domains studied.
2. Identify (on brain diagrams and images) the primary brain areas and networks involved in the
cognitive domains studied (e.g., vision, audition)
3. Describe the major disruption and recording methods used in cognitive neuroscience, explaining
the strengths and weaknesses of each.
4. Explain major cognitive neuroscience findings that have contributed significantly to our
understanding of major cognitive domains.
What is cognitive neuroscience?
- What is cognitive Nueroscience?
- A young science: Historical backdrop
- Neuroanatomy overview.
What is the camera theory? Is it right or wrong?
The brain records the world like a camera, providing accurate(although incomplete) pictures of the world that form the basis of our actions.(WRONG)
What is the brain important for?
To think(Information).
What is the camera theory? Simple definition that he say?
Is creating this sort of hight fidelity representation of the world around us and then using that to guide our actions.
What were the observations from the pasta? His explanation?
there was no noodles in the bowl, Decreasing zoom out empty space.
Almost everyone- will draw it out from the frame.
they sort of extrapolate beyond the edge they saw. Phenom called boundary extension.
What is it called when we saw the spaguety we drew zoom out ?
Boundary extension
What is boundary extension?
Boundary extension reflects cognitive processes that extrapolate beyond the boundaries in the stimulus to provide the basis for planning eye-movements and other actions in the environment (Intraub et al., 1989)
“Demonstration the brain is like a recording, it’s like a camera that takes a snapshot of the world, then use vertical images of the world to guide our behavior.” is this true or not? What does it mean?
But, made completely different image is not.It is in a very different spatial scale. It is also, different for each person in the same way. it is constant thought across multiple people.
What is the hypothesis 2 since the first one is incorrect?
When we view the world, we have a limited picture of the world around us, but there’s enough regulators in the environment, that we can generate prediction of what is beyond or view.–It is useful to guide our movement to make a life plan.
What illustration reveals?(1)
1) Reality is constructed: We do not perceive the world vertically( What we’re getting, you know , our internal representation of the world is not just like a camera. its not a snapshot of the world. its a constructive representation of the world in the mind)
1a) Constructive not just a picture in the mind, can be different like a optical illusion.
1b) It is useful for behavior, but does not necessarily has to be a vertically response to be a reality.
What illustration reveals?(2)(3)
The mind/brain influences perception: Our minds/brains imposes structures(via cognitive process) on the stimulation we receive contributing to the really we experience.( Mind brain intencherchangeble, mind imposing the structure or representation, systematically altered)( inputs and outputs)
Universally: Despite clear individual differences our mind function similirarty( Everyone makes the same mistake).
What is cognitisim(3)
The brain is an information-processing system
* Information processing: Mental representations are transformed by cognitive
functions to support perception, thought, action, and so on
* The brain instantiates multiple parallel and sequential cognitive functions that
mediate between input and output
* To fully understand the brain, we must understand the cognitive functions itinstantiates and how it does so.
What is the picture of the cognition.
Stimulation-> cognitivism-> response
What is the overall idea of the brain?Cognitivism perspective
The idea is that the brain instates cognitive functions that transform, say, in this case, sensory inputs, to generate memory representations and representations that guide behavior.” Cognitivism perspective, logical function.
“Like we are not going to study the brain by looking at neurons, and its patterns of electrical activity”(look at the informed process)
In contrast to cognitivism: Reductionism
“the idea that the most fundamental layer of nature holds the explanation for all the features of the outer, higher layers” (Williams, 1997)”
(goes down)
Cognition
Biology
Chemistry
Physics
MATH
What does Reductism say?
That we can study cognition, but really one we have a deep understanding how neurons word do
reductionism vs cognitivism what is the difference between them?
If brains are, after all, just
assemblies of cells, then once we
truly understand every facet of all
cell function, the principles of brain
function will be evident.
Even if we did know about all the
synapses, all the transmitters, all the
channels, all the response patterns
for each cell and so forth, we would
still not know how an animal sees
and smells and walks”.
While this reductionist perspective suggested, okay, you might be able to find some fundamental level and describe everything on that level, the cognitive perspective is this idea that there’s multiple levels of which we can understand the brain.
What is cognitivism and Neuroscience?
Dfferent branches of neuroscience represent different levels
of analysis of the brain:
* Molecular neuroscience(Neurobiology) seeks to understand the brain at the
level of its biochemical processes
* Cognitive neuroscience seeks to understand the brain at the
level of its information processe.
We need to think about the cognitive perspective. Since it will not tell us nothing, need to look at it as abstract as possible information processing devise. Both are necessary in understanding the human brain.
What is the computer theory for the brain?
We cannot understand a computer without understanding the
software it is running.
We cannot understand the human brain without understanding its
cognitive functions.
Understanding cognition. (abstaract)
What is the mathematical theory associated with the brain?
A cognitive function is something that takes some inputs, performs a transformation on them, and then generate an output
What is the pattern of light example?
But as you’ll see, we can characterize in terms of a representation. So there’s a pattern of neural activity on the retina. But we can think of it as a representation of a pattern of light.
And that pattern of neural activity gets transformed in some way that ultimately leads to, for example, your ability to identify who a person is based on seeing their face. What’s happening is that patterns of neural activity are being transformed along these processing stages until you get to the pattern that’s associated with a person’s facial identity.
And at a more abstract level, we can think of it as patterns or types of representations, so like patterns of light, patterns of edges, patterns of the 3D features of the face, and then ultimately the facial identity.
What is the function of the brain?
What is the function of the brain? The function of the brain is not to conduct electricity across from neuron to neuron or send neurotransmitters from one part of the brain to the other. That’s not the right way to think about the function of the brain. We really want to understand the brain. We need to think about its function in terms of information processing.
What electrical function does the brain do?
It’s moving electricity all around from neuron to neuron. For information processing
Why is cognitive a young science?
More than a century modern research on the brain and cognition, neural theory, and cognitive theory.
Neural theory (neuroanatomy, physiology)
* Cognitive theory (psychology, cognitive science
The integration of neural and cognitive theory is
RECENT
* The first Cognitive Neuropsychology textbook: 1998!
Cognitive neuoscience , young field, cognition long time, basic of neuroscience. Both research integrated together is fairly recent.
Where is the mind History(4)
1)Cardiocentrism: Mind located in the heart poetic
2) Ventricular localization:So it was a major focus on fluids as the key sort of underlying physiological substrate for lots of different things, including the mind. And they thought, oh, here’s this area that has a lot of fluid inside of the head. The head seems to be important for cognition. Maybe this fluid is what underlies the mind.
Very detailed theories. Not all true.
3)cerebral localization:
Tissue in the brain is responsible for thinking since we had the same ventricular as other animals and supposedly we are smarter and different thus it has to be the brain
4) cortical localization:
People had accidents that were very specific to some type or regions.
What is cardiotrism?
Cardiocentrism: the belief that the heart
is the seat of intellectual and perceptual
functions
* Aristotle (384-322 B.C.)
* “broken heart”, “heartfelt thanks”, “learn by
heart”
What is Ventricular localization? And the 3 parts of it
1)Ventricular localization: the fluid-filled
ventricles are the location of cognition:
2)Perception/imagination: lateral ventricle
3)Cognition: third ventricle
4)Memory: fourth ventricle
Widespread view from the 1st century through
the Middle Ages and Renaissance
What is cerebral localization?
Realization that the ventricles are unlikely to be the seat of higher mental functions because the ventricles of humans are not
dissimilar from those of animals with clearly inferior mental abilities
* The localization of respiration to the medulla and sensory and motor functions to the dorsal and ventral roots of the spinal cord led
to the idea that other parts of the brain might support other, higher-level mental functions
Who was Gall(German physician
and anatomist): 1758-1828? And what did he Believe?
Cortical Localization:
* The brain is composed of as many organs as there
are mental faculties (aka: cognitive functions)
Phrenology:
* These mental organs vary in size and their size
affects the shape of the skull
* One can study a person’s character and faculties by
studying the external configuration of the skull
* Sought evidence by studying the skulls of people
with exceptional traits: poets, statesmen, people
with mental illness, etc.
What is phrenology?
Phrenology:
* Correct about cortical localization of function
* But wrong about evidence from skull shapes
It turned out to be a pseudoscience, but at the time there were
a lot of adherence to this idea that
that there are different specialized functions in different parts of the brain and that
That just like in the way that if you use a muscle a lot, the muscle will grow. That if you use a particular cognitive function a lot, that part of the brain will grow.
And actually that you could then even tell this by looking at the surface of the skull. That there would be bumps in the skull, that would tell you something about people’s mental faculties because they have an enlarged part of the brain that’s involved in memory or something like that.
turned out not to be true, but
This person, Franz Gahl, developed a whole theory about this. It became very popular. There were journals and societies dedicated to it.
Now, it turned out that he was wrong about this, but there was one sort of element of this idea of phrenology that actually turned out to be right, which is that there is
functional specialization of the brain. Different regions of the brain do have different specialized functions, right?
It’s just that those regions don’t get larger if you are better at that function.
You definitely can’t see anything on the skull, right? You can’t tell if somebody has a good memory by likegetting some information about the shape of their skull.
Competing views on the neural instantiation
of cognition? What are the 2 different concepts?
Functional localization:
Specific cortical areas perform specific cognitive functions
* There may be interactions between cortical areas, but these interactions
are sufficiently limited, such that we can usefully understand the brain by
identifying its cognitive functions and their localization in the brain
And the idea is that of course there are interactions across brain regions and we need to, you can’t just like, we can’t fully understand the brain by just studying.
each brain region of isolation. At some point we need to understand how they interact with each other. But there’s enough localization of function. Study each section individuality.
Holism:
The cortex is a dynamic whole which is more than the sum of its
parts
* Music cannot be understood as individual notes
* Squareness cannot be understood by individual lines
* The brain cannot be understood via decomposition into local areas and
component functions
The contrast to this is something like holism where
The idea here is that the neural basis of cognition is so widespread and so dynamic in the brain.
That
You can’t possibly go in and study one brain region and try to characterize what its cognitive function is. It’s so interdependent on every other region of the brain that you’re just misleading yourself. That’s like trying to understand music by studying the individual notes or whatever, not understanding how the notes work together to form a piece of music that gives an aesthetic experience.
You’re missing the sort of bigger picture by focusing on individual regions.
Who was Paul Broca:1824-1880
French physician
* Tested the hypothesis that
language is a faculty of the
anterior frontal lobes
Tan (Leborgne): extreme difficulty in
speaking but no paralysis of lips or
tongue, and no language comprehension
difficulties
* Autopsy revealed damage to the “3rd
convolution of the frontal lobe of the left
hemisphere” (which we now call the
inferior frontal gyrus)
* Turned the tide in favor of functional
localization (as opposed to holism)
And he had no difficulty with language comprehension. It was clear that you could talk to him, he could follow directions, but he couldn’t speak. He had this difficulty generating speech.
Related debate: Neurons as continuous cytoplasm or independent units?
Fused neural networks (Golgi)
Independent units (Ramon y Cajal)?
If all neurons are fused, how can there be localization of function, as suggested by Broca’s findings?You know, the microscopes weren’t as powerful, the techniques for isolating cells weren’t as good. So it was actually really difficult to try to resolve this debate. It turned out that the key piece of evidence for resolving this debate came from Golgi.
Turning point: Silver nitrate
So Golgi had been arguing in favor of this like Fuse network idea and he was experimenting with different types of stains so he had these like you know dishes of slices of neural tissue that he was staining and trying to characterize the structure of the neurons and he just hit upon this particular stain that would get picked up by specific neurons. It’s actually not fully understood why. Specific neurons would pick up the stain and it would diffuse through that neuron
And it would give you like a very clear picture of that neuron and it wouldn’t go to any other neuron.
And so a lot of people saw these results and thought. Well, this is very clear evidence that all the neurons are not fused together because there’s clearly like an endpoint to where this goes. It doesn’t just fuse to all the other cells. It seems to be restricted to this one cell. It suggests that it’s an independent unit.
Interestingly, Golgi himself was not convinced of this idea from this evidence. He went on to win a Nobel Prize, and even in his Nobel Prize acceptance speech, he still argued for the fused neural network idea. But most of the rest of the neurophysiology community was convinced and then of course we then later learned that indeed that was correct and it sort of was the starting point of what’s called the neuron doctrine. The idea that the sort of most basic element of the brain is the neuron and each neuron is an independent
Silver nitrate stain: Stains random neurons.
Discovered by Golgi (1873) in a kitchen,
working by candlelight
* Convinced most (but not Golgi himself)
that neurons are not continuous and
connected—instead, they are independent
units
* The Neuron Doctrine
* Neurons are separate physiological units
* Electricity travels in one direction down a
neuron
Purkinje cell (cerebellum)
How Do neurotransmitter communicate(Draw picture, then explain)
Presynaptic neuron receives signals->
Moves current down an axon->
Triggers release of neurotransmitter at the synapse->
Passes signal to post-synaptic neuron
Addition and Subtraction:
Excitatory signals (EPSP): increase the probability that the
post-synaptic neuron will fire (generate a signal)
Inhibitory signals: (IPSP) decrease the probability that the
post-synaptic neuron will fire (generate a signal)
Electrical signals are the basis of information processing in
the brain
what’s happening when neurons are
communicating with one another is that
Neurons send signals to one another
either synapses by releasing neurotransmitters.
One neuron releases a neurotransmitter and the neurotransmitter lands on a downstream neuron.
It changes the likelihood that that downstream neuron will itself send signals to other neurons. So at a very simple level, we can think of this as either
exciting the downstream neuron or inhibiting the downstream neuron. So it excites the downstream neuron. It’s increasing the probability that the downstream neuron
will fire an active potential and then some electrical activity will travel down the downstream neuron and it will release neurotransmitters that it’s synapses.
If it’s inhibitory, then it decreases the probability that the downstream neuron
will fire an actual potential.
So at the simplest level, we can think about it as like neurons are sending signals to one another that basically increase or decrease the probability that the next neuron will then send some other signals to another set of neurons.
So it’s like, well, pluses and minuses. You have a bunch of neurons doing this, and it determines when neurons are finding their action potentials.
So this is the basis of information processing in the brain.
Neural computation
100 billion neurons in
the human brain
* typical neuron has
1,000-10,000 synapses
* ~60-100 trillion
synapses
* A LOT of computational
capacity!
We talk about neural representations when we talk about sending signals, when we go on information processing. It’s all really instantiated in neurons sending signals to one another. And as we’re going to see, we can get a picture of that by recording the actual potentials of neurons. It tells us when they’re sending signals to other neurons.
or using other methods to indirectly tell us about when neurons are firing action potentials.
Okay, so
What is neurotomy?
earning neuroanatomy is analogous to learning a language or
geography; it is a slow process of building inch by inch and learning by
repetition.” (DeArmon, Fusco & Dewey. Structure of the Human Brain.
1989)
Directional terms
Directional terms
* Dorsal or superior = top
* Ventral or inferior = bottom
* Anterior or rostral = front
* Posterior or caudal = back
* Medial = middle
* Lateral = sides
Note that these are relative terms
* Bilateral = on both sides (hemispheres)
* Ipsilateral = on the same side (hemisphere)
* Contralateral = on the other sid
What are the names of the brain surfaces? Watch picture
Dorsal or superior means at the top.
And by the way, these directional terms are relative terms, right? So we can say…
Like this, you know the superior part of the brain overall So it’s like the very top of the brain or I could say like the superior part of the temporal lobes We’ll see what that is soon, which would be like actually like halfway up the brain, right? This is like the top part of the temporal lobes
Ventral or inferior means the bottom.
Anterior or rostral means the front and a posterior or caudal means the back.
Medial means in the middle and lateral means on the sides. Again, these are relative.
I could talk about like the medial aspect of a particular gyrus or something like that, right?
doesn’t necessarily mean the middle of the brain, it means like the middle, you know, the part of that gyrus that’s closer to the middle. here are other terms that describe the laterality.
So you could say bilateral, meaning on both sides of the brain. You could say ipsilateral, meaning on the same side. So this will come up when we talk about like lesions. So you could think about like the effect of a lesion on
cognition or on like say motor control for example and you can talk about that as being ipsilateral or contralateral. So for example if you have a lesion to right motor cortex it will result in difficulty controlling the left side of your body right so that that’s a contralateral lesion right or the impairment
is contralateral to the lesion, right? You can say it either way, right? Whereas if’s lateral would mean on the same side.
How many vasculature are there?
400 miles of blood vessels
what are the ventricles( Do pictures)
Ventricles contain cerebrospinal fluid
(CSF), produced by blood vessels in the
ventricular wall
* CSF is also present between the brain
and skull to protect the brain, like a
shock absorber
What are the key structures
Thalamus
* Limbic system
* Cerebral cortex